<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Intel CPU Overclocking Latest Topics</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/forum/126-intel-cpu-overclocking/</link><description>Intel CPU Overclocking Latest Topics</description><language>en</language><item><title>PROJECT: "THE ICE TRACTOR / HIGH BEAST AIRFLOW / CONCRETE WALL" (MARCH 2026 STATUS REPORT - HWBot EXTREME EDITION)</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/246093-project-the-ice-tractor-high-beast-airflow-concrete-wall-march-2026-status-report-hwbot-extreme-edition/</link><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span class="ipsEmoji" title="">⚙️</span> CORE ENGINE &amp; OVERCLOCKING CPU: Intel Core i5-3570K (Ivy Bridge, 22nm) - Golden Sample Tier. Clock Speed: 4.40 GHz ROCK SOLID (Ratio 44x) – Zero-Throttling "Concrete Wall" Stability. Voltage (VCore): 1.250V Fixed (Manual Override Mode) – Extreme Efficiency/Stability Ratio. Motherboard: MSI Z77 MPOWER (Big Bang Series). Military Class III / 16-Phase Hybrid Digital Power Design / OC Certified. PSU: XFX Pro 550W (Seasonic OEM Core) – High-stability rail. <span class="ipsEmoji" title="">⚡</span> MEMORY &amp; GRAPHICS RAM: 32GB (4x8GB) Patriot Viper "Black Mamba" DDR3 @ 1867 MHz (XMP Profile). GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Idle Temp: 27°C). <span class="ipsEmoji" title="">❄️</span> THERMALS &amp; CHASSIS ("THE WIND TUNNEL") Case: Antec Twelve Hundred (V3) – Full Tower Airflow Monster. CPU Cooler: Hummer Series Tower (275mm Total Height) – 4x Direct Contact Copper Heatpipes. Chassis Fans (6-Fan Extreme Airflow): Side: ARCTIC P12 Slim PWM PST (Blasting direct air on MPOWER VRMs). Top: 1x 200mm "Big Boy" Exhaust (Negative pressure king). Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 120GB (Running @ 17°C – Airflow Verified). Ambient Delta: 10°C Ambient (Winter Benchmarking Environment). Current Thermals: 38°C - 44°C (Idle/Low Load @ 4.4 GHz Locked). <span class="ipsEmoji" title="">🐧</span> LINUX KERNEL &amp; LOW-LATENCY OVERRIDES OS: GNU/Linux (Rolling Release, March 2026). Kernel: Liquorix 6.19.8-2 (Zen-Optimized Interactive Scheduler). Extreme Boot Flags (GRUB): intel_pstate=disable, cpufreq.off=1, processor.max_cstate=0, idle=poll. Strategy: Total bypass of frequency scaling and power-saving C-States. Zero Wake-up Latency. <span class="ipsEmoji" title="">🛑</span> LATENCY DOMINATION (vs MODERN ARCHITECTURES) Cyclictest Result: &lt; 5ms. Worst-Case Latency. The Reality Check: The "Ice Tractor" responds faster than a Core i9-14900K (Stock) running standard power management. While modern chips are "sleeping" to save pennies on the bill, this Ivy Bridge is already through the finish line. <span class="ipsEmoji" title="">📊</span> BENCHMARK PERFORMANCE: SILVERBENCH (2422 SCORE) <span class="ipsEmoji" title="">💀</span> THE "HALL OF SHAME" (STOCK TARGETS DESTROYED): Intel Targets: Core i7-6700 (Skylake): Humiliated. Your 8 threads mean nothing against the 16-Phase MPOWER stability and 4.4 GHz raw clock. Core i5-9400F (Coffee Lake): Beaten in responsiveness. The 9400F is a software-shackled dog; the Tractor is a pure silicon beast. Core i3-10100/10105: Surpassed. Lower memory latency and superior cycle management. Intel N100 (2023): A mobile toy. Completely obliterated by 2012 engineering. AMD Targets: Ryzen 5 1600 / 2600: Ivy Bridge IPC at 4.4 GHz makes Zen/Zen+ look like a slideshow in single-threaded tasks. Ryzen 7 2700: 8 cores watching the taillights of a 2012 quad-core. Kernel latency is embarrassing on Stock Zen+ compared to this setup. AMD Athlon Gold 7220U (2023): Modern architecture, budget performance. Easy prey for the Tractor. STATUS: ROCK SOLID. "The MSI Z77 MPOWER isn't a motherboard; it's a license to kill. 2012 Architecture, 2026 Tuning. Power saving is for the weak. 1.250V of pure, undiluted performance. No mercy for modern silicon."</span></p><p><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed ipsRichText__align--block" data-fileid="19838" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/Schermatadel2026-03-2522-22-41.thumb.png.a69c9ea04d74867cb8a9d6f518eaa108.png" alt="Schermata del 2026-03-25 22-22-41.png" title="Schermata del 2026-03-25 22-22-41.png" width="800" height="450" data-full-image="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/Schermatadel2026-03-2522-22-41.png.f14b2220c9f8fc731a5bc58837aa0101.png" loading="lazy"></p><p><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed ipsRichText__align--block" data-fileid="19839" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/Schermatadel2026-03-2521-29-16.thumb.png.991b706ae8e04dfd658748b1a24a98eb.png" alt="Schermata del 2026-03-25 21-29-16.png" title="Schermata del 2026-03-25 21-29-16.png" width="800" height="450" data-full-image="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/Schermatadel2026-03-2521-29-16.png.512743304c94923e10b798be0325624d.png" loading="lazy"></p><p><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed ipsRichText__align--block" data-fileid="19840" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/IMG_20260315_172853.thumb.jpg.75111957accf38819baf87fa4a5379d9.jpg" alt="IMG_20260315_172853.jpg" title="IMG_20260315_172853.jpg" width="484" height="600" data-full-image="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/IMG_20260315_172853.jpg.04082421e5d613d630022112fd0e21c6.jpg" loading="lazy"></p><p><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed ipsRichText__align--block" data-fileid="19841" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/651912144_10231418319137317_5213314836487319824_n.thumb.jpg.b2b43170be8e569e913e0438c954c338.jpg" alt="651912144_10231418319137317_5213314836487319824_n.jpg" title="651912144_10231418319137317_5213314836487319824_n.jpg" width="447" height="600" data-full-image="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2026_03/651912144_10231418319137317_5213314836487319824_n.jpg.b2b63ba58793fa818ac76414673b82ed.jpg" loading="lazy"></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">246093</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:17:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Clarkdale issue</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/240582-clarkdale-issue/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I have two motherboards, GA-P55A-UD3R and GA-H55M-UD2H</p><p>The problem is that when I install a Clackdale i5 6xx or i3 5xx processor, the motherboard does not boot correctly, causing reboots with code 0</p><p>With the Lynnfield i5 7xx 65nm processors, it works perfectly</p><p>The motherboards use the latest version of bios, I don't see the point</p><p>Can someone shed some light on the causes for this?<br>Thx!</p><p></p><p><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed ipsRichText__align--block" data-fileid="18644" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2025_02/Whats-App-Image-2025-02-05-at-18-47-22.thumb.jpg.2bcf5b2c63b82025ce0432faaf9aa033.jpg" alt="Whats-App-Image-2025-02-05-at-18-47-22.jpg" title="Whats-App-Image-2025-02-05-at-18-47-22.jpg" width="1000" height="753" data-full-image="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2025_02/Whats-App-Image-2025-02-05-at-18-47-22.jpg.d95cc6684d4a886df18df19aa80fa11c.jpg" loading="lazy"></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">240582</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 16:51:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Strange behaviour when using SetFSB</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/185069-strange-behaviour-when-using-setfsb/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	I just discovered a strange issue when raising FSB using SetFSB in Win XP, when I add more than 5MHz of FSB the multiplier starts to drop.
</p>

<p>
	This only seems to appear in XP, I used the same version of SetFSB in Win 7 x64 and it worked just fine (both CPU-Z 1.85)...
</p>

<p>
	Setup used was a ASUS P5E64-WS EVO and a Pentium E5800 but I also had the same issue on a EP45-UD3R but with 10MHz above boot-FSB...
</p>

<p>
	EDIT: Seems like a CPU-Z bug, CPU-Z 1.63 displays the right multi, but I can't use that to validate for obvious reasons <span><img alt=":(" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/sad.png" srcset="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/sad@2x.png 2x" title=":(" width="20" /></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span>EDIT2: The CPU itself isn't lowering clocks at all, spi runs are nearly the same within the 1MHz where the bug accurs...</span>
</p>

<p>
	Anyone ever had a simmilar problem and might know a fix?
</p>

<p>
	Any help would be greatly appreciated <span><img alt=":)" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/smile.png" srcset="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" title=":)" width="20" /></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">185069</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:35:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Socket G2 BCLK overclocking, how to unlock? 1155 also?</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/209181-socket-g2-bclk-overclocking-how-to-unlock-1155-also/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I remember that there was a way to unlock bclk overclocking in 2nd and 3rd intel gen. Mobile (socket G2) and desktop (1155) also.<br />
	As far as I remember it has to do with an easy mod. Just find the proper signal, and then connect it to high or low state. Some gamming notebooks has BCLK overclocking enable by default. What application allows to change bclk? Is this BCLK app able to run from Win XP?
</p>

<p>
	Maybe I'm wrong with this 1155 (I've got a DELL Q77 motherboard and it'd be nice to OC it), but definitely socket G2 is overclockable by BCLK. So what can you say overclockers?
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">209181</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:05:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>ASUS old OC PANEL ?</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/223865-asus-old-oc-panel/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I am re-organizing and re-locating my old hardware stuff at the moment , and i came up with this device that i cant remember which exact board used it ?
</p>

<p>
	I am almost certain it's from X58 era.
</p>

<p>
	All comments welcome <span class="ipsEmoji">?</span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvKRuIZpy45rglb0mCpk7KBUmKw7?e=B7UZyu" rel="external nofollow">https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvKRuIZpy45rglb0mCpk7KBUmKw7?e=B7UZyu</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">223865</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Motherboard recommendations for Core 2 Duo/quad OCing</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/221017-motherboard-recommendations-for-core-2-duoquad-ocing/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hey all, first post here...
</p>

<p>
	I have some Core 2 Duos laying around that I hope to attempt OCing them at some point. E7500, E7600, and E8600. What would be some decent OCing boards I can get without breaking the bank on let's say, Ebay?
</p>

<p>
	Thanks for the insight. <span><span>:) </span></span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">221017</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Xeon Phi Benching and Challenge</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/211434-xeon-phi-benching-and-challenge/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hello! <br />
	I've been really interested lately in the Xeon Phi family of Intel products, and decided to buy myself more than a few cards, and I've been having a bunch of fun with them! I feel like sharing these out to people who would be interested in helping develop what they need to keep them interesting to bench, whether that be an offloader so that we can run more than gpupi on them (Maybe pass over the GPUPI domination to all the other categories :O!), or a way to mod the bios on these cards to provide higher clocks to push the records even higher. If you are at all interested in getting a phi, or own a phi, come join the conversation over at <a href="https://discord.gg/SVVSWUvFwG" rel="external nofollow">https://discord.gg/SVVSWUvFwG</a>, and throw a dm at RJGamesAhoy#5932, or a message in #soon-to-be-xeon-phi-owners if you need any help getting one to you in the US, or possibly outside of the US if there is enough interest to ship international!<br />
	<br />
	Have a nice Day/Night and I hope to see you in the server!
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2022_03/IMG_20220310_144443444.jpg.4bdba9853fe5eb541eac3bb60b9b4cd3.jpg" data-fileid="13416" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="IMG_20220310_144443444.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="13416" data-ratio="133.21" width="563" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2022_03/IMG_20220310_144443444.thumb.jpg.d82a10ff16c8d804f30bcea68caa13e6.jpg" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">211434</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 06:41:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>"Please give me a hint"</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/211274-please-give-me-a-hint/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	What settings are desirable to increase CPU scores in 3DMark Time Spy, etc.?<br />
	What about a 12900K CPU?<br />
	Is it better to OC only the P-core without functioning the E-core?<br />
	Is it better to leave hyperthreading applied?<br />
	I am wondering because currently it is inferior to 12700K in CPU score!
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">211274</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:46:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>10980xe Low CPU Usage during fire strike physics score</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/210360-10980xe-low-cpu-usage-during-fire-strike-physics-score/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I have been running the 3D Mark Fire strike benchmark this afternoon, I normally run a 5.2ghz overclock (chilled water) on this bench but thought I would have a play with 5.3ghz. My normal score for physics on 5.2ghz 1.38v would be around 36100 ish however when I bumped it up too 5.3ghz 1.48v there was pretty much no change in the score. I checked my thermals in Aida64 to make sure I wasn’t throttling and Double checked the clock was applied and all seems to be in order. The only thing I did notice was that my CPU Usage was around 76% throughout the bench mark. Can anybody confirm if this is typical behaviour of the benchmark with the 10980xe? If not does anyone have any idea how to get it to utilize closer too 100% without setting realtime as that just causes other issues.
</p>

<p>
	I use a stripped down os specifically for benching so there is little to none going on in the background.
</p>

<p>
	Any advice will be greatly appreciated <span class="ipsEmoji">?</span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	System specs if it helps:
</p>

<p>
	10980xe 
</p>

<p>
	x299 dark 
</p>

<p>
	Gskill trident Z 3800mhz 12-12-12-26 1T 
</p>

<p>
	2080ti kp 
</p>

<p>
	1600w PSU
</p>

<p>
	Chilled water 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">210360</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2022 17:38:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>how easy is overclocking?</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/209429-how-easy-is-overclocking/</link><description><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#ffffff;border:0px;color:#878a8c;font-size:medium;padding:5px 16px 5px 0px;vertical-align:baseline;">
	<div style="border:0px;color:#1a1a1b;font-size:14px;padding:0px 0px 1px;vertical-align:baseline;">
		<p style="border:0px;padding:0px;vertical-align:baseline;">
			I would love to overclock the new i9 10900k since it's basically meant for it, but really don't know the way to go about it... is overclocking as simple as watching a few youtube tutorials or is it much more complex with intricate tweaks? if I don't know what I'm doing, should I just avoid overclocking completely? Thanks all.
		</p>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">209429</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 15:07:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>For intel cpus, is the CPU overclock more effective than RAM overclocks?</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/209351-for-intel-cpus-is-the-cpu-overclock-more-effective-than-ram-overclocks/</link><description><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#ffffff;border:0px;color:#878a8c;font-size:medium;padding:5px 16px 5px 0px;vertical-align:baseline;">
	<div style="border:0px;color:#1a1a1b;font-size:14px;padding:0px 0px 1px;vertical-align:baseline;">
		<p style="border:0px;padding:0px 0px .25em;vertical-align:baseline;">
			I have a i7 9700k that is currently running 5 Ghz. I have a Patriot Viper Steel 4133 kit (32 GB) that I havent overclocked at all. Its still running at stock speed. When I use the XMP profile, it just messes up the boot and my computer goes into an endless cycle of starting and restarting.
		</p>

		<p style="border:0px;padding:.8em 0px .25em;vertical-align:baseline;">
			I was wondering, for Intel CPUs, is the CPU clock more important than RAM overcl
			
			<span style="color:#1155cc;font-size:10pt;text-align:center;"><a href="https://vidmate.onl/" rel="external nofollow">VidMate</a> </span>ock (in terms of performance)? 
			
			<span style="color:#1155cc;font-size:10pt;text-align:center;"><a href="https://mobdro.onl/" rel="external nofollow">Mobdro</a></span>
		</p>

		<p style="border:0px;padding:.8em 0px 0px;vertical-align:baseline;">
			If not, how does one decide what timings and speed combos to use?
		</p>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">209351</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Xeon E55XX RAM divider unlocked</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/190202-xeon-e55xx-ram-divider-unlocked/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	It seems like i managed to accidentally unlock the RAM and NB dividers on a Xeon E5504, so far i only managed to reproduce this with a very specific OS and once you completetly shut down the system it's locked again (hotswapping ssds is possible though to get extra mem speed on diffrent OS)...
</p>

<p>
	Here's some 32m runs with 2:10, 2:8 and 2:6 to prove that it is not only display bug of CPU-Z <span><img alt=":)" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/smile.png" srcset="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" title=":)" width="20" /></span>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="4443" href="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2019_07/screen000.jpg.f3413eeee9d64840467edf68874e381c.jpg" rel=""><img alt="screen000.thumb.jpg.c1f42c0d3faf6eeb09235f7f0e8d0e31.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="4443" data-ratio="62.50" width="1000" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2019_07/screen000.thumb.jpg.c1f42c0d3faf6eeb09235f7f0e8d0e31.jpg" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="4444" href="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2019_07/screen001.jpg.1664cafc78ea1dc6d036d62a1412eb13.jpg" rel=""><img alt="screen001.thumb.jpg.f6998e26744524177314e7635d3bde68.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="4444" data-ratio="62.50" width="1000" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2019_07/screen001.thumb.jpg.f6998e26744524177314e7635d3bde68.jpg" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="4445" href="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2019_07/screen002.jpg.38fab309857e8e3dc3b65c9492d40824.jpg" rel=""><img alt="screen002.thumb.jpg.23640dae3eeb33f30e14bdfd21d79104.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="4445" data-ratio="62.50" width="1000" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2019_07/screen002.thumb.jpg.23640dae3eeb33f30e14bdfd21d79104.jpg" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<span>Will upload video of how i did it later, maybe even immage of the speciffic OS i used, if i can't find what exactly causes it...</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span>How I did it:</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span>1: </span><span>take windows 7 (so far only one of my copys worked)</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span>2: reset during boot, so you get the option to boot in safe mode</span>
</p>

<p>
	3: set memory settings that should work but are locked in bios and apply
</p>

<p>
	4: when windows asks you coose boot normaly and hope it locks up
</p>

<p>
	5: press reset button on board (do NOT press powerbutton)
</p>

<p>
	6: POST screen should show the ram/nb settings you applied
</p>

<p>
	7: boot into OS, if you wan't to bench on XP or simmilar disconnect SSD while in OS and press reset button and it should boot into whatever OS you connected with the propper settings
</p>

<p>
	<span>Hope someone will be able to reproduce this </span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span>EDIT:</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span>Youtube video:</span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo">
	<div>
		<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" width="480" data-embed-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_gMuKw4Hi0I?feature=oembed"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	I have now tried this on X58A-OC and X58A-UD7 without any success, so probbably only works on ASUS Boards, unfortunately i only have the one Rampage III Extreme, allso i managed to get it to work on all windows 7 installs i have, key element was to get the recovery screen where the cursor is on start "automatic repair", not on "start normaly" <span><img alt=":)" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/smile.png" srcset="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" title=":)" width="20" /></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">190202</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:11:36 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Unlocking Multi on Athlon (XP) for hwbot benchmarking?</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/209115-unlocking-multi-on-athlon-xp-for-hwbot-benchmarking/</link><description><![CDATA[<p style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:14px;">
	Hello!
</p>

<p style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:14px;">
	 
</p>

<p style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:14px;">
	I've a couple of socket A (socket 462) Athlons, Durons here. As we all know it is easily possible to unlock the multiplier. But is it allowed for hwbot benchmarks? I've some Athlon Thunderbirds which are "factory unlocked" (no lasercut on L1 bridges).
</p>

<p style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:14px;">
	<span style="font-size:1%;"><a href="https://100001.link/" rel="external nofollow"><span style="color:#000000;">https://100001.link/</span></a><span style="color:#000000;"> </span><a href="https://192168101.dev/" rel="external nofollow"><span style="color:#000000;">https://192168101.dev/</span></a><span style="color:#000000;"> </span><a href="https://1921681254.link/" rel="external nofollow"><span style="color:#000000;">https://1921681254.link/</span></a></span>
</p>

<p style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:14px;">
	Is it allowed to use non-standard multipliers on "factory unlocked" CPUs?
</p>

<p style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:14px;">
	Is it allowed to use non-standard multipliers on "factory locked" CPUs?
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">209115</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Rampage III Extreme Boardview/PCB files</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/208661-rampage-iii-extreme-boardviewpcb-files/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I know someone mentioned having problems with this board (R3E) so here are the .FZ files I have<br />
	Hope they can help
</p>
<p>
<a class="ipsAttachLink" href="https://community.hwbot.org/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=11342&amp;key=376625ba700e904ac61e944dac172069" data-fileExt='fz' data-fileid='11342' data-filekey='376625ba700e904ac61e944dac172069'>RAMPAGE_III_EXTREME_1.04GA.fz</a> 
<a class="ipsAttachLink" href="https://community.hwbot.org/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=11343&amp;key=a0de158f1cfe1429bb66860bf106031b" data-fileExt='fz' data-fileid='11343' data-filekey='a0de158f1cfe1429bb66860bf106031b'>RAMPAGE_III_EXTREME_1.04GC.fz</a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">208661</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:22:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>R3E OC Panel, still useful today?</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/204286-r3e-oc-panel-still-useful-today/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I was going through some old stuff, and found what I believe are a pair of old OC Panels for ASUS Rampage III Extreme. Are these still useful for anyone benchmarking old CPUs? I don't think I ever became friends with the X58 platform and didn't use them even once myself.<br />
	<br />
	In case someone knows something about them, what boards do they work with other than the R3E? Maybe R3BE?<br />
	<br />
	If it's unclear, it's the one on the left here I'm talking about.<br />
	<br />
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2021_02/050.jpg.2f60eb90c66b7f4f79ab4bd52b9eb01b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="9821" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/monthly_2021_02/050.thumb.jpg.f145990ecd2a7f407c691479aa8e54d5.jpg" data-ratio="76.06" width="986" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="050.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">204286</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:19:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Gene VS apex VS extreme (z399) overclocking on water</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/198176-gene-vs-apex-vs-extreme-z399-overclocking-on-water/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Gene VS apex VS extreme (z399) overclocking on water. Need advice
</p>

<p>
	Thanks in advance 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">198176</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:06:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>x58 max bootable/max total PCIe</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/188103-x58-max-bootablemax-total-pcie/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	I have recently (over the past year) been binning boards and CPUs (as well as having others check their CPUs/boards) for maximum BCLK. With Setfsb, most decent Boards are comparable/not gonna be a limiting factor below 300 MHz BCLK, but bootable I ran into some issues on some of my otherwise best boards. Note that &gt;118 PCIe only becomes necessery after ~261 MHz BCLK, so this will be irrelevant for most people. 
</p>

<p>
	x58a-oc: max bootable 135-136, max in Setfsb ~138 (3 boards tested, comparable results)
</p>

<p>
	Rampage II Extreme: max bootable 118-120, max in setfsb ~138 (2 boards tested)
</p>

<p>
	Rampage III Extreme: max bootable 118/134, max in setfsb around 135/unknown (2 boards tested)
</p>

<p>
	Rampage III Formula: max bootable 118, max in setfsb currently unknown (2 boards tested)
</p>

<p>
	x58a-UD7 rev 1: max bootable 133, max in setfsb 135 (1 board tested)
</p>

<p>
	EX58-UD3R: max bootable 126, max in setfsb 127 (1 board tested, unmodded)
</p>

<p>
	x58 DK T3eH6: max coldbootable 115, max trainable 118, max in setfsb 119.8 (1 board tested)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Testing procedure is basically upping PCIe until it no longer boots at ~1.4V or less ICH voltage (upping this to &gt;1.5V brings 1-2 MHz, same for the related PCIe voltage) and then upping in setfsb using the highest bootable setting. All devices not needed disabled off course. <strong> If anyone has more boards to add to this list I would be glad. </strong>If there is a mod to Asus boards to up the max bootable PCIe clock that would be amazing, because for baseline BCLK they have been reliably higher then the Gigabyte Boards (both x58a-ocs were 2-3 MHz worse at ambient. On Dice I suspect that I was limited by the max bootable PCIe clock holding me back (<a href="https://hwbot.org/submission/3961491_ground1556_reference_frequency_rampage_ii_extreme_285.97_mhz" rel="">286</a> Asus, <a href="https://hwbot.org/submission/3960131_ground1556_reference_frequency_x58a_oc_287.22_mhz" rel="">287</a> Gigabyte, note that the E5606 doesn't work on Gigabyte but generally seems 2-3 MHz better)
</p>

<p>
	Some boards appear to be able to train max PCIe or scale with ICH/ICH 1.5V Voltages, but those appear to be more of an exception.
</p>

<p>
	Thanks for the current state of the list goes to Jokot, Tagg, quiekmew, coldwove, Tapakah and T.Rex
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	There is far more to x58 max BCLK, though it appears to mostly involve <a href="http://warp9-systems.proboards.com/thread/647/1366-bclk-binning" rel="external nofollow">binning</a> hundreds of CPUs.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">188103</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 13:46:36 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Foxconn X58 Flaming Blade GTI</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/196123-foxconn-x58-flaming-blade-gti/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hello,
</p>

<p>
	does this board need a mod to support xeons like some evga boards do?
</p>

<p>
	i have one that is not booting with westmere xeons of any kind (X,E,W), latest bios i was able to find within a quick search is a spectre / meltdown microcode modded p10 based.
</p>

<p>
	Some google searching tells me that the board is able to run xeons, but are there some different revs? the board is not labled with a  rev.
</p>

<p>
	Someone has got a link to a official bios? all links i found are dead, offical site is down.
</p>

<p>
	Thanks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">196123</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Binning data request</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/190907-binning-data-request/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I am looking to see if people are willing to share their binning data on a few cpu's, the i7 920, e2180, e2200, and any other cpu/gpu binning data people are willing to share.
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">190907</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 03:54:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>8700k and 9900k overclocking 5.3ghz</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/191597-8700k-and-9900k-overclocking-53ghz/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">5.3GHZ is impossible in my environment</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">CPU voltage up to 5.2GHZ is possible with 1.45V level, but beyond that</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">It becomes impossible even if the voltage is increased to 1.6V.</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">This is the same for both 8700K and 9900K</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">Is my setting bad or is it basically lacking power capacity?</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">Configuration is M / B XI GENE VGA RTX1060 PSU 850W</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">LLC canceled level 8 C state</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">CPU temperature stays below 90 degrees in Core Temp</span><br style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" /><span style="color:rgba(0,0,0,.87);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:pre-wrap;word-spacing:0px;" title="">Please advice</span></span>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">191597</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Are all mobile ES CPUs unlocked?</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/189478-are-all-mobile-es-cpus-unlocked/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Title.
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">189478</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 09:57:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Multi GPU  running at Intel X299</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/188732-multi-gpu-running-at-intel-x299/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hi OCers!<br /><br />
	I need a bit of tips, not for benchmarks but in fact for maximum stability in a long period of time running under stress.<br />
	What I have <span>:</span>
</p>

<p>
	i9-7960x, Sage WS 10G, 128GB RAM G.Skill Trident Z CL16, and 4 RTX 2080 TI.<br />
	This config is stable, but system was hanging at 1.9 CPU input voltage - I've changed to 1.95. <br />
	Haven't really move VCCIO 1.1 &amp; VCCSA beyond 1.15 - low because this MB has PLX chips.<br /><br />
	I'm curious should I increase VCCIO and VCCSA or if it's stable should I leave it alone.<br />
	I know that RAM is getting into the picture and 128 is a lot for this platform  - without controllers and ECC. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	If You had any suggestions please share.<br /><br />
	Thanks <br /><br />
	Peter
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">188732</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:28:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bloomfield on LN2</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/188342-bloomfield-on-ln2/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hi,
</p>

<p>
	I have about 20 Bloomfield chips to bin through and have tried one on LN2 but the results were not promising: Windows boot only around -65 or warmer, best stability around -80 and complete CB around -105. Is this typical? Gulftown is easier, there are many more resources online about CB/CBB behaviour and my 980X chip followed those descriptions pretty well. Bloomfield on the other hand has much less stuff online. Is there a CB killer minor voltage or is binning for a chip with the coldest CB most important? I tried on the UD9 but also own a RIIIF and RIIIE.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">188342</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 03:57:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>X48 Ram Advice</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/160486-x48-ram-advice/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am really not sure what I'm missing here, basically I can get up to 600FSB and use any ram setting I want with full stability, anything after that an I need to turn ram speeds right down to have the slightest bit of stability. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now I am probably forgetting something basic here but I've seen guys with 700FSB screenshots and over 2K ram clocks. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Just a pointer really at what setting I could possibly be missing or forgetting would be really appreciated.</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">160486</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Aopen i975xa-ydg issue bug CPU probe</title><link>https://community.hwbot.org/topic/187368-aopen-i975xa-ydg-issue-bug-cpu-probe/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hey guys
</p>

<p>
	I will try to repair a Aopen i975xa-ydg but i've a issue on the cpu probe (locked at 125° / 1F).
</p>

<p>
	Impossible to boot windows or installation (i've tested with other mb for it), i've testing others bios (1.03G/1.10) and the Tcore mod but it's the same...
</p>

<p>
	If you've a solution... (i've research old threads on XS but can find anything for that, just explain the issue). it's so old, my memories is bad <span><img alt=":D" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/biggrin.png" srcset="https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/emoticons/biggrin@2x.png 2x" title=":D" width="20" /></span>
</p>

<p>
	Thank
</p>

<p>
	Bob
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">187368</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2019 19:48:30 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
