HWBOT OC-Crime Center

Do we not need cpu test for 3dmark 05 score? benching gtx 460 right now and it seems the top 40 or so dont have cpu test. I never knew that was ok you need cpu test for orb link no????

Hi guys, I think it's time maybe to change the rules, how you guys think about that? the thing is : When somebody has a good cpu, a binned one like SB 2600K 58x, and lent his mobo to fellow team members, just plug in another vga, to get best points in the old 3dmarks. that's to easy to boost up you're points, because for 3dmarks it's now allowed to share cpu and mobo. That's a shitty rule. It's time everybody benches with his own hardware, and not use a golden binned cpu setup for the rest of the team to boost up points with just plug in you're vga. How you guys think about it?

i did not kown where to put this but i thuoght i'd put it here. i'v had more then one 3d submission blocked because of not having the drop down box in gpuz showing so just a reminder because alot are forgetting to do that.

Hello everyone, First i'll say sorry for post on this section because i don't know where is i should posting it, Sorry Well from title thread is i posted " MSI MOA 2011 Thailand Qualify stupid competition, stupid rules " i'll come to share something wrong or something not clear about MSI MOA Thailand, I mean to MSI Thailand is not MSI hope everyone will understand So about a month ago from 4th-May MSI Thailand make online competition qualify for MOA APAC final at Jakarta Indonesia to yesterday (4th-June) final of competition, well it have alot of not be clear or obvious then let to see what happen about it The competition have two choice for compete …

1. unigine heaven - time and date this started the look into it some more - possible same ssd/hd - same gpu speed from screenshots - link to hwbot score http://hwbot.org/community/submission - desktop was busy the previos days, next day desktop was cleaned. same ikons /2155721_dentlord_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_dx11_geforce_gtx_580_2395.43_dx11_marks - link to hwbot score http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2153350_romdominance_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_dx11_geforce_gtx_580_2334.85_dx11_marks screenshot of unigine: 2. sp32m - boring stuff but - same cpu -to reiterate same cpu...screen shot of 3d03 …

I was just looking for some HD4850 results and found this one: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1090321_dinho_fatal1ty_3dmark06_radeon_hd_4850_19936_marks?tab=info First I thought it was just some kind of bugged run because he isn't showing subtest details but than I used the 3DM06 formula for score calculation and got a different score. That means he did edit the sm2+3 score with some paint proggie. final score = 2.5 / ( ( 0.3/cpuscore + 1.7/((sm2+sm3)/2) ) / 2) So I had a look for some other submissions of this guy and many are photoshopped. For example: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1093917_dinho_fatal1ty_3dmark06_2x_radeon_hd_485…

Here are the submissions : http://hwbot.org/community/submission/817879_kaptan54_3dmark03_radeon_x1050_64bit_4076_marks?tab=info http://hwbot.org/community/submission/817880_kaptan54_3dmark05_radeon_x1050_64bit_2326_marks?tab=info http://hwbot.org/community/submission/752124_kaptan54_3dmark2001_se_radeon_x1050_64bit_14870_marks When you look at the screenshots the Device ID is 5B63 which is the Device ID of the X1050 128Bit (you can take a look at the X1050 128Bit Ranking for proof) The real Device ID of the X1050 64Bit is 5B60 then why on his screenshot it's written 5B63 + 64 Bit ? Is it painted or it's a GPUZ reading error ?

http://hwbot.org/competition/hoc_apr11?tab=stage%205 If you look at the submissions by CP you'll see the progression of the cards travel.

Hi, I accidentally noticed this while browsing the rankings: Fishy submission It's submitted in 6850 category, but high score made with unusually low GPU core clock caught my eye. Look at the GPU-Z screenshot, he used 6950 to make that score and submitted this in 6850 ranking: a) by mistake b) on purpose (cheating) to get the points I'm no big player here, but anyway, this stuff stinks and should be made right.

Supposed to be 2nd of 58...... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2150759_ny_driver_wprime_32m_athlon_64_3200_venice_s939_49sec_516ms&popup=true Supposed to be 3rd of 44....... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2150760_ny_driver_wprime_1024m_athlon_64_3200_venice_s939_26min_45sec_922ms&popup=true Probably the wrong sub-forum, but we shall see.

Please this is a very serious issue, NO MESSING AROUND, i have taken time out of my busy schedule to develop what i feel is a very elegant and suitable logo, please vote on it as you see fit!

I submitted a wprime 1024m but entered in my times wrong for a 32m run e-e Can anyone correct his for me? I just noticed this when I checked my everything D: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1090775_lord_xeb_wprime_1024m_core_2_q6600_2.4ghz_11sec_791ms Time is suppose to be 369.731 seconds... not 11.791 e-e I also got awarded points for it which makes me feel even worse.... I think this run is worth maybe 5 if not even that... not 140+ pointes

As the title states ... to what extend should this be anonymous? Non-visible threads, non-visible user accounts, anonymous users (but visible threads) ... ?