Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

mrmouse

Members
  • Content Count

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

16 Good

About mrmouse

  • Rank
    kitchen robot

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thank you for the Information. Found and got both AMIBCP Versions.
  2. @TAGG Thanks TAGG Yes, i have some Links. There are two Kinds of this 5-Digit Voltmeter; the "DC 0-33.000V" shows at every Range 3-Digits after Point. The "DC 0-4.3000-33.000" shows till 4.2999 4-Digits after Point and after hitting 4.300 it switches to 3-Digits after Point. The ebay-Seller "diy-electronic" was the Dealer where i got the 5-Digit LCDs from. But there is another Seller, which sells these Voltmeters; alice-electronic. On Overclock.net i made a own Thread about Voltage Display's (Voltmeter, Voltage Monitoring, LED Panel) Hopefully this Informations are what you as
  3. Thank you for your Input and your Wishes I'm fully aware of the Fact, that there are a lot more Things to do. Especially that you can't force so much Voltage into the vAGP/vNB-Lane when using AGP-Cards. And there is no real Solution to split them so you could adjust both separately. I have got one or two Ideas, but till now i don't know how to accomplish them. The very first EPower-Test was done; and then the 775Dual-VSTA got a Short-Circuit because of leaking Watercooling-Block ...
  4. Today i have done a few more Benchruns with chilled Fluid on the NB. Just double checked if 402/403 FSB is somehow possible; not today, not really. @GRIFF That was my first Thought, too The "Magical-400" on VIA PT880 Pro. @TASOS Thanks. To be honest; no, i haven't tried any other CPU for max FSB on this Mainboard. I had some Trials with this E8400 on other MBs and i knowed, that it can do easy 500 FSB. So i decided to start with this CPU, to be sure that it isn't the limitation Factor. Maybe i will try a Conroe for Science. @Leeghoofd You asked how high it wou
  5. The Result was altered by me a few Times. After two better Scores i decided to change NB-Cooling from Water to chilled Fluid. So i had to change the Details another Time.
  6. mrmouse

    It's back!!

    Nice that the Wall-Functionality is back. Every Time i see that there are some little Changes/Updates i get more and more happy. I'm so excited about the Future of HWBot.org Great Updates, super Team :) Just a few more Patreon-Supporters would be awesome.
  7. Yes, i tried the Vintage-CPUz-Edition, without success. Also i tried to move the CPU-Z.exe into different Folders with different .ini-Files. Tried a lot, but nothing seemed to get the Success. The only thing, to get rid of these Error on CPU-Z 1.78 to 1.95, is to set the Multiplier to 15,0x. Mulitplier 16,0 and 15,5 -> strange Behavior. Multiplier 15,0 and lower -> no Problems But this isn't for me a "real Solution"...
  8. Thanks a lot for the FAQ Haven't a look at the very Bottom. Just to be on the safe side; if i use old enough Hardware, there is no need to get a CPU-Z Validation on there Site (https://valid.x86.fr/)? So it would be enough, when i do a normal Screenshot instead of Validation-Link for CPU, Mem and FSB-Frequency? For me, the Validation-Page for CPU-Z doesn't take/upload any Files under v1.94; so i even can't upload them. You said "Unchecked" on the Validation-Website is not allowed for Submissions like CPU, Mem and FSB-Frequency? A lot of the Top-Overclockers have unchecked
  9. Hi Guys A few Days ago i got the same Issue with an E5800 on an Asus P5E3 Deluxe/WIFI and Windows XP SP3. Like 'TAGG' said, even if you boot with higher FSB, the Problem is still there, it just moves. I tested all CPU-Z Versions down to v1.58. The Issue starts with CPU-Z v1.78. With CPU-Z v1.77 i got some fast "hopping" of Numbers when i start to rise FSB. But a few Seconds later it stabilizes. I have about 2 of 5 corrupted CPU-Z Validation Files with v1.77. With v1.69 no Issues are found. The Point is, like 'Luumi' said, that it's only a Visual Bug. But if i try to g
  10. Pay attention to "Max clock/cache speed of 4605Mhz monitored by BenchMate"
  11. Pay attention to "Max clock/cache speed of 4605Mhz monitored by BenchMate"
  12. Hi Guys 🙂 Glad to see some Upgrade on HwBot; the Rules look more clean now and should be more overseeable to new Members. Fine Stuff and i hope for some positive HwBot-Processing this Year 👍 What me wonders a bit; why is 'CPU-Z Mainboard' no longer mandatory? In some Cases this could be very interesting and, in my humble Opinion, it is an important Aspect in Overclocking. (To open CPU-Z a third time is really no Effort) And what is with GPU-Z Monitoring? Is it now Mandatory? Or is the first GPU-Z Tab enough? Older Cards with AGP and Stuff like that; do they need Monitoring?
  13. Thanks, mate. To you: Congratulations on your Win @ Round 3 Intel legacy C 🎉🍻
×
×
  • Create New...