gotohell
-
Posts
51 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by gotohell
-
-
Model: Voodoo3 2000 AGP (Avenger) 3dfx Cooling: Air (Stock) Speed: 222MHz (+55.24%) / 222MHz (+55.24%) Its on 5.5(5) mem?
-
"There should be a custom pledge option available which allows you to donate any amount you wish." ++ (reg needed )
-
add 1$ donate
-
add as ITRZ 604 X2.8
-
1 minute ago, Liq-met said:
Let me show you the abacus you little shit. Look at read, the timings and the fsb.Ooh my special salty maddy boy, ok, 652fsb VS 631 / 2-2-2 timings vs unknown.
PB GA-SIMlNF mobo has ~175fsb(8 M-RZ 166-170), i solder to it VDD booster and we talk tommorow.
-
6 minutes ago, Liq-met said:
maan u got shit un your eyes? No man, u don`t see shit on yourself eyes!
I told you blind idiot. Don't get smart with your fu%%. Look at the SPD tab and look at the standards for 266/333 and 400 and now look at his and your own. Yet?
U are comletly mad.
Its not a mem or timings, i tested SIS w 3200 / 3500 / 4000 DDR.
-
19 minutes ago, Liq-met said:
You blind or idiot? 3dmark requires more than 512 mb (further algorithm) with low timings, look at your 200 mhz w/ standart settings. Satisfied? Yet it estimates s-cashe, 512 KB and more good, rofl. Theme from stupid!
Its a sort of mental retardation? Or yur mum dropped you head down?
Once again retard, GA-8blabla SIS650/651 mobos, dosent react to timing change / or react very bad.
at GA-8S651 and GA-8SIMLH (i have PacardBell rev, green txt) gives us 1400-1500sc at def set
at third screen u can see DDR400 w t:2-2-2-6, maan u got shit un your eyes?
Even if we take Aopen MX46U2 mobo (it react to timings very good, but dosent suport prescot, and dosent have mem divider) we still get +/- same result
BUT if we take Aopen S651M w SIS330, we can get very easy 2.3-2.5score (at 128mb v-ram)
Fuck, what wrong whith u all
-
9 minutes ago, Antinomy said:
Full stock, after CMOS clear. Only disabled COM/MIDI/Audio. Nothing overclocked or tweaked.
Like my friend Ilya Cemenko aka TiN said: " Uchi matchast' "
and so?
Use HWInfo+CpuZ
-
1 minute ago, Antinomy said:
You see "The benchmark was not run using default settings" ? Mine doesn't because it's run under default settings like your first 4 runs.
on deff setings Z-Buff32bit
From rules:
QuoteIt is allowed to run non default settings with graphics cards older than 2001 that don’t support default features.
-
So, my dearly maddy boy, tell us, how u get over 2.5k score w 64VidMem
-
315
stok -> stok + SIS OCC -> DDR OCC -> etc...
Last 3 (over 2k) w Z-Buff16bit
-
1 minute ago, keeph8n said:
so we started with saying its cheating, to then clamoring on about not cheating, but then into name calling.
If the score isn't correct, report it with details as to why and let the mods handle it. Name calling and screaming cheating is not the way.
Yep, i analyze 5 mobos, and sevral bioses on Aopen / Giga mobos.
-
mod, del ALL results until 1.8k , overcloking SIS315 dosent help get a score (+300 its max what i see)
-
Oh my *ucking god, its not a cheats or SIS330, its 16bit Z-buffer. *ucking retards, sis315 from 11/2001 use 24bit one!
-
Its result for 128Vid ram, sooooooo its cheating, or its SIS330
-
On 5/14/2020 at 7:06 PM, Leeghoofd said:
K lets try to keep it that way, the bug what caused it is adressed
-
Quote
Looking for 500€ plus shipping
Holy crab bro, i have a great deal for ya, all in your list + many more (P4(+Cel) 533/800; Xeons 50** ser; X6700; ) for 400€
Instant cash! Only today!
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:
Problem is adressed, can everybody verify if it works now plz
Thx Alby
-
Stop weinig, u pussiez, better tell me, SPD flash contacts has single dot on mobo back side, or not?
I have multipy buzz signal on diferent contacts...
.thumb.jpg.09b3fc758c42d704bfb9c1f1b3dc0a16.jpg)
-
7 hours ago, ground1556 said:
It seems to only affect team captains.
+
Regular members works fine
-
С"mon, i want renew Xeon2.4 records, and finish bench another 604Xeons
-
after login
-
-
On 3/19/2019 at 6:53 PM, ObscureParadox said:
you have click on the achievment and try and manually recalculate it to see if that works?
thats dont help me, but achievements recalculated.
.jpg.32949bf4bf4a0dcb165c0aeb6885ee16.jpg)
gotohell - 315 integrated (SiS 650/651/740) @ 165/133MHz - 4372 marks 3DMark2000
in Result Discussions
Posted