ceemic

8GHz will fall soon. Keep pushing it m8!

Massman, actually I thought about comparing that case with finding good-clocking CPU. And that's all I wanted to know. Tnx.

But when I submit my unlocked 550 wPrime result, then I have an advantage over "def" users.

Hi! I don't know if here has been discussion about that. But my question concerns AMD Phenom II X2 and X3 CPUs. As we all know, theres a possibility to unlock some of these CPUs to X4. Can we use these unlocked CPUs in hwbot submissions? 3DMarks (2006, Vantage), 2D tests (wPrime), CPU-Z max? Tnx. EDIT: from rules: Tho, this quote doesn't say anything about unlocked cores... Lets say I have X2 550 unloced to 4-cores. I could use it for example superpi and submit it under 550 category. As we know, spii uses only one thread, so I don't have any advantage compared to "def" 550. But when it comes to wPrime...?

knopflerbruce, tnx. But any specific OS and system tweak? How about changing priority and affinity with some .bat file?

OT: what's the trick for fast pifast run?

"performance points"

I ment, with what Vista You compared to it? I'm pretty sure that lited/tweaked 32bit Vista is faster than XP on wPrime.

Chiller, was that lited and tweaked Vista?

...and wPrime likes Vista

Vivi, is it 64bit or 32bit win7?

Use the report option and they will be blocked...

Subtest FPS's are required. Add them also, so we can compare Your run with that other one. Bug might be just one test, for example Nature. He uses newer drivers also. Try to test that also. Good luck!

No, unless there is a valid ORB link.

I asked lolloom to delete his submission and submit it again. So we'll see in few minutes, how this time the order goes...

So what does HWBOT crew think about that?

...and Hz, not hz

There's no question, this run is faster. So maybe can some moderator change the order? Tnx!

I use this thread to ask almost the same question. My team-mate did a SuperPi1M run with P4 D805: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838393 He is placed #15 with 29,906sec but the user in #14 has 29,907sec time. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=740&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 Is that a bug due to numbers "rounding"?

I'd love that idea. We, in Team Estonia official forum foorum.hinnavaatlus.ee have run that benchmark long time. As DonNiger allready posted, there is a score-board also: http://www.wolk.pri.ee/nc/tabel.htm http://foorum.hinnavaatlus.ee/viewtopic.php?t=355254 Older version thread: http://foorum.hinnavaatlus.ee/viewtopic.php?t=297467

I have run this benchmark since s939 times. Scores are too different between several runs made with exactly the same settings. Tho, good thing is, I haven't seen any bug run with "impossibly" higher scores.

ReverendMaynard, yep, no problem with that. You can make things easier and faster, If You tell me the PWM controller marking now. It's probably NX2420 or uP6201. Good luck!

Nuclearus is very nice bench, but I'm afraid, it's too "unstable"...

I can help You with that probably. Send Your card layout pictures to my email: alarichallika@gmail.com We'll sort it out

Massman, You're right on that CaNNon, Yes true I just wanted to know how these rankings are done...