ZL1

Nicely done mllrkllr88 ! very sporting of you too ;) I live too far so dont really count me, just felt the need to appreciate your gesture !

efficiency my friend, very nice run woomack ! wtb

nope .. nu ajuta plus vezi ca eu nu am vrut sa scot team info, doar bestOC, fix ca la der

la ce field ? ca nu am field bestOC si restu incercat dar nu-l afecteaza

hehehe, sounds like fun, well I could try, think 3core hyperpi will work too ? btw side question, howd u make ur sig so clean ? I can remove the best oc no matter what

hmm, sorry nu observat asta, mci (beer)

can I ask you to fix this one too ? http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2363540_ I dont know why they are posting like this

rofl, now I dont know how that happened sorry and thx

yap, tried doing that but without much success but heres the funny part, I also tried disabling all but 1 core from bios and same fail

guys I spotted something odd, submitted some e6300 stuff and its not being rated right, I mean this here http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2363525_ It says 1 of 1 .. now I know Im 2nd ) and there are more submissions there now the CPU is selected correctly, if you click on it from within the submission, it does go to the e6300 page.. a glitch Im assuming, perhaps something thats already known, but in case its unknow TIA Dan

anyone know this one ? not a big deal .. but Im constantly missing this one because it either wont run on win7 or wont run at all on multi cores I know Ive seen ppl do it, but how ?? TIA Dan

oh I see, somehow I never think like a cheat bad cheat,but also bad cop I guess in this case I actually like no1, the avg, motivates you to try for higher and also affects the old score, as it has been matched, meaning it lost from its status no matter what

actually imo it should be the other way around, efficiency should be first, so smaller mhz = higher score, since its a more efficient run

lol, alrite good luck

who won week4 I wonder, everything stopped somehow ..

Thank you, will be looking forward to the decision, I am sure it has to coincide with mine it just makes sense, the whole point of this bench was to multi-thread bench --- pai si logic eu nici nu vreau sa rulez altfel, nu vad sensu deja

whats the point then ? seriously, that shouldnt be allowed and about half the submission should be pulled may as well run superpi then or use hyperpi as a replacement for superpi, what made hyperpi interesting was the speed at which the cpu can calculate multiple threads of pi, but not one ..... one can be done by superpi please reconsider the rules, they are not correct TIA, Dan

Gen, a wrapper perhaps ? Dev, Im totally not onboard with that, I think it should be popularity based, give all that are not easy to abuse points, but the points should only scale with popularity (like they do for popular vs unpopular hard, but this time for benches too)

dunno, wasnt showing for some reason, sorry

just curious, some of em (ex cinebench) are quite good benches

oh I know I have it, I just meant maybe fix the link for new members/what not

I see it, but there seems to be a glitch, it doesnt come up in the box unless I paste the exact full name and then only sometimes . odd if I start typing m2n68 only the SE comes up, and as you know if its not selected from the suggestions, it doesnt work, simply paste and it wont read it

hasnt for some time actually

http://www.asus.com/Motherboard/M2N68AM_PLUS/ http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2693336 Thank you in advance.

ty I had it, but for the new guys etc