boshuter

Whats up with this situation with the 2900pro's? I've reported a few of these scores, started a thread in the result moderation section, and posted this one in this thread...... it seems like everyone is just ignoring this. If you are going to allow scores from cards detected as XT's in the Pro class, then everyone running an XT might as well submit as pros. If you are not going to fix it, just say so.... but please let us know one way or another.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695974 Wrong card, this is XT, not pro. Can we please get the HD2900pro submissions fixed? It seems a lot of people are flashing the pro to xt then submitting scores under pro..... this is not right, when that card is flashed it is for all intents and purposes, an xt; It's recognized by all the benchmarks as xt. If they want to score pts in the pro class, then bench a pro, not an xt. This is not fair to the people who actually want to bench a pro card and submit, they shouldn't have to compete against those who are too lazy to oc their card the traditional way.

Is anything going to be done about this? I have a pro and would like to bench it, but it's not fair to have to bench against XT's. The problem is, once a card is flashed to XT, it becomes an XT for all intents and purposes; There is no way to tell if it's a flashed PRO or an original XT. We need to require a GPUZ shot of the benches (AM3) that only have SS for verification.

Why are almost all the top scores in the 2900pro all showing 2900xt's? I realize you can flash a pro to an xt, but if you do, the score should be submitted as an XT. If you want to score as a pro card, then don't flash to XT. A gpuz shot should be required for all benches submitted without an ORB submission to make sure they are pro cards and not XT's. This is only fair to the guys that want to bench pro's, there is no way of telling a card is a pro that has been flashed or an actual XT.

This score is in the wrong cpu section, it's submitted as a 660 prescott and is really a 661 cedar mill. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503279

You got the 960 removed, but the other one is still wrong. The top score is the 950 @ 4.6ghz, I think he just entered the wrong score. The results URL is below. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=557377 I can't find a "report" link?

I was checking the results for the Presler 950 CPUZ scores and something didn't look right. I always thought I had the second highest but there were 3 ahead of me. I go to checking the validation links and it turns out the first place one is listed as 6.4ghz when in reality it is 4.6ghz, the third place entry is actually a Presler 960 not a 950. Below is a copy/paste of the listing. Arctic Ice's Pentium 4 'D' 950 6411.44mhz 6411.44 (this one is actually 4.6ghz) Entsafter's Pentium 4 'D' 950 5991.65mhz 5991.65 PcCI2iminal's Pentium 4 'D' 950 5921mhz 5921.00 (this one is a 960 not a 950) boshuter's Pentium 4 'D' 950 5617.63mhz 5617.63 I hope this is the correct way to point out this discrepency.