Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

str8_an94baller

Members
  • Posts

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by str8_an94baller

  1. On 8/13/2023 at 5:37 AM, Mr. Fox said:

    I can't get TurboV Core to work on any version of Windows newer than LTSC 2019 (W10 Pro 1809). I don't get any BSOD on W10 21H2+ or W11, it just doesn't work (see my post above yours).

    damn that's unfortunate, it's confusing why turboVcore works on W11 22H2 but for z490/10900k

    but doesn't work on this Z790 platform, I even disabled core isolation/memory integrity

     

     

     

    also I really need guidance @Papusan@Mr. Fox@Splave

     

    need guidance on how to stabilize 7200++

    7000 is stable

    7200 will boot, but will have errors with TM5 (extreme, absolut, heavy, pcbdestroyer) when 1-3 hours in the test, initially would be ok

    7400 will boot, but will have errors with TM5 (extreme, absolut, heavy, pcbdestroyer) almost immediately when test is started


    I tweaked some votlages to boot 7000 and higher successfully, but not able to get it fully stable

    anyone got ideas?



    cpu: 13900KS with thermalright frame - cpu is stock
    mobo: Maximus Z790 Hero bios 1202 (6/13/2023)
    ram: 7600 C36 hynix a-die 2x16gb (ddr5)

    note: values in parentheses are readout from the mobo bios monitoring

    ddr5 2x16GB
    7200
    Stock timings
    tXPDLL: AUTO
    tXP: 4
    tPD: 0
    MCE enabled
    CPU is stock

    system agent: 1.25v
    cpu input: 1.8v (actual 1.777)
    high dram voltage mode: enabled

    VDD: 1.55 (1.545-1.56)
    VDDQ: 1.55 (1.56)


    advanced memory voltage
    IVR transmitter VDDQ: 1.32
    memory controller voltage: 1.3 (1.279)
    mc voltage calculation voltage base: auto
    VDD calculation voltage base: auto
    VLDO: AUTO (1.8v)
    VDDIO: AUTO (0.99v)
    VDD: 1.55v (1.545-1.56v)
    VDDQ: 1.55v (1.56v)
    VPP: 2v (1.995v)

    VDD switching frequency: auto
    VDDQ switching frequency: auto
    VPP switching frequency: auto
    DRAM current capabilities: auto
     

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/328891236918493184/1151862562552561704/image.png

     

    thanks in advance guys

  2. On 12/9/2020 at 7:14 PM, SunnyStefan said:

    804 is old I wouldn't bother with it, 0901 doesn't seem to be worse in any way I've noticed thus far. I would go with 1002 but I can't vouch for it personally. 0901 is solid.

    0901 any performance or stability (higher clock, better timing?) improve compare to 0088?

     

     

     

    also are you using the apex vrm tool .exe? I'm not sure how it improve stability "if cache isn't se too high" as @Falkentynesaid

  3. On 10/16/2020 at 3:17 AM, speed.fastest said:

    Hello, does anyone testing 0088 (Apex) vs 0707 (Latest Retail BIOS)? In my test 0707 is much better clocker & score, but lack of TXP & PPD. Can anyone made 0707 BIOS with TXP & PPD added? Thanks

     

    On 10/28/2020 at 10:28 AM, Sparky's__Adventure said:

    news from @wagipon

    Performance at 4766 with 0088 was beating performance at 4800 on 0804

    Both bioses not modded

     

    So I have 3 bioses to choose from 0901/0804/1002

     

    All with ucode because I plan to run daily 24/7 (for now)

     

     

    0901 = with tvb oc, but does this have txp/ppd in bios?

    0804 = "mature" 0088 with txp/ppd in bios, not sure if any improvement?

    1002 = official beta bios with resizable BAR feature

     

    any that you guys would recommend for now? seeing as resizable BAR isn't that useful due to only RX6*00 GPU supporting it (I have 3090)

×
×
  • Create New...