Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

aspstein

Members
  • Posts

    130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

aspstein's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Hi Seems like a lot of Nvidia Quadro and ATI firepro cards are missing from the database, making it not possible to add scores for these. Is there any possibility to add these cards? aspstein
  2. If the attempt is to make it as easy as possible I think it would be better to have categories like: Extreme, regular and stock. Or something like that. I personaly think that its a good idea to add waterchiller, or write in the guidelines that if you use waterchiller you have to choose singel phase cooling. Another thing is that a waterchiller basically is a combined singel stager with watercooling. Maybe it could be possible to choose both the two categories?
  3. No screenshot and no orb link, score still can be real. But who could know? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598340
  4. Wrong PCMark05 results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 - Dead validation link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602394 - No screenshot and dead validation link Look at this score, under the test phane in pcmark, is it supposed to look that way? Looks photoshoped to me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655301
  5. This is the best, real competition between some real hw geeks. Keep up the competition guys. What would the world be without hwbot?
  6. Seems to me that this new benchmark is quite advanced. And futuremark har probably used alot of time making it. But I think it shouldnt be added to hwbot before its free. Or atleast you should be able to run it a couple of times to get a score. And 25 minutes. Jeez
  7. Got this in an email this morning. Its an update for 3DMark®06/05/03 and PCMark®05 to improve core/memory colck detection on videocards. I havent tested the hotfix yet. but it should have any impact on results. Link to the download and more info can be found here: http://www.futuremark.com/download/hotfix_oct07/
  8. I dont think ot will decrease the life expectancy much, at the end of the day it is the way you use the engine that counts. I think it will manage 150HP easy, look at the Seat Leon 150HP 1,9tdi or the golf 150HP 1,9 tdi. Isnt theese almost the same engines? 130-140HP i reacon is safe. But then again I usually overclock all my Hw to be running on the edge...
  9. Nice cars guys! I own a BMW 325TDS 99 modell, will take som photos soon. And richba5tard, get a chip in that Skoda.... 150Bhp, 365NM What did you pays for your cars? Here in Norway the prices are sky high... A new Golf GTI cost about 60000 euros here....
  10. Whats the difference between the AMD Athlon 3800+ AM2 and AMD 3800+ Orleans?? Seems that people are posting results in both categories...
  11. Best hardware i ever bought: 1. Celeron 347 3,06GHz did 7,7GHz on LN2 sucky performance, insane overclocker.... 2. 7900 GTO Did 1000/930 cooled with dry ice, and a bit voltmodded... hehe 3. AMD x2 3800+ s939. Had this sucker running 3,0GHz on air. But it didnt have any coldbug. 3,6GHz stable on dry ice. 4. My Asus P5B deluxe wifi (P5B Deluxe Jesus Edition) This poor mobo has died about 5 times. But with a bit cleaning and love it allways raises from the dead. Its missing a pin in the socket, has about 10 fsb holes, can only run fsb:memory 1:1, and has been washed in my shower about 10 times. I love it....
  12. Some more.... E6300 not X6900 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572490 No CPUz?? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570918 The bot has uploaded users avatar instead of picture... lol and its a E6400 and not a X6900 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574234 E6400 and not X6900 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564154 QX6700 and not a Q6700 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596084 No image, and forumpost not working? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581704
  13. As I can see all the results postet under the E6800 category CPU is wrong. Seems that all of them are X6800s Can anyone confirm/enlight me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=&cpu=Intel+Core+2+E6800+%282.93Ghz%29&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1001&offset=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Regards aspstein
  14. Yeah that might be worthy a frontpage... ? I just hope he will do a 32m run lol...
×
×
  • Create New...