aspstein

Hi Seems like a lot of Nvidia Quadro and ATI firepro cards are missing from the database, making it not possible to add scores for these. Is there any possibility to add these cards? aspstein

If the attempt is to make it as easy as possible I think it would be better to have categories like: Extreme, regular and stock. Or something like that. I personaly think that its a good idea to add waterchiller, or write in the guidelines that if you use waterchiller you have to choose singel phase cooling. Another thing is that a waterchiller basically is a combined singel stager with watercooling. Maybe it could be possible to choose both the two categories?

No screenshot and no orb link, score still can be real. But who could know? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598340

Wrong PCMark05 results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 - Dead validation link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602394 - No screenshot and dead validation link Look at this score, under the test phane in pcmark, is it supposed to look that way? Looks photoshoped to me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655301

This is the best, real competition between some real hw geeks. Keep up the competition guys. What would the world be without hwbot?

Seems to me that this new benchmark is quite advanced. And futuremark har probably used alot of time making it. But I think it shouldnt be added to hwbot before its free. Or atleast you should be able to run it a couple of times to get a score. And 25 minutes. Jeez

Got this in an email this morning. Its an update for 3DMark®06/05/03 and PCMark®05 to improve core/memory colck detection on videocards. I havent tested the hotfix yet. but it should have any impact on results. Link to the download and more info can be found here: http://www.futuremark.com/download/hotfix_oct07/

I dont think ot will decrease the life expectancy much, at the end of the day it is the way you use the engine that counts. I think it will manage 150HP easy, look at the Seat Leon 150HP 1,9tdi or the golf 150HP 1,9 tdi. Isnt theese almost the same engines? 130-140HP i reacon is safe. But then again I usually overclock all my Hw to be running on the edge...

Nice cars guys! I own a BMW 325TDS 99 modell, will take som photos soon. And richba5tard, get a chip in that Skoda.... 150Bhp, 365NM What did you pays for your cars? Here in Norway the prices are sky high... A new Golf GTI cost about 60000 euros here....

Whats the difference between the AMD Athlon 3800+ AM2 and AMD 3800+ Orleans?? Seems that people are posting results in both categories...

Best hardware i ever bought: 1. Celeron 347 3,06GHz did 7,7GHz on LN2 sucky performance, insane overclocker.... 2. 7900 GTO Did 1000/930 cooled with dry ice, and a bit voltmodded... hehe 3. AMD x2 3800+ s939. Had this sucker running 3,0GHz on air. But it didnt have any coldbug. 3,6GHz stable on dry ice. 4. My Asus P5B deluxe wifi (P5B Deluxe Jesus Edition) This poor mobo has died about 5 times. But with a bit cleaning and love it allways raises from the dead. Its missing a pin in the socket, has about 10 fsb holes, can only run fsb:memory 1:1, and has been washed in my shower about 10 times. I love it....

Great

Some more.... E6300 not X6900 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572490 No CPUz?? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570918 The bot has uploaded users avatar instead of picture... lol and its a E6400 and not a X6900 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574234 E6400 and not X6900 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564154 QX6700 and not a Q6700 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596084 No image, and forumpost not working? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581704

As I can see all the results postet under the E6800 category CPU is wrong. Seems that all of them are X6800s Can anyone confirm/enlight me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=&cpu=Intel+Core+2+E6800+%282.93Ghz%29&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1001&offset=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Regards aspstein

Yeah that might be worthy a frontpage... ? I just hope he will do a 32m run lol...

We have a team competition going on atm. And as you can see from the rankings we are making som good progress The Norwegian team was started back in Oktober 2006, we have 94 registered users. And among them some old legends, like Stoolman and Overklokk. Feel free to join us if youre in lack of a team. Our goal is to keep the team in the top 10 league. And so far it looks like we are going to be able to do that. The members forum is http://www.diskusjon.no. Lin to our team Some more info on our team competition: 3 categories: 1. An Overklokk built singlestage phasechange goes to the one who has the best % overclocked CPU. 2. A gigabyte motherboard, AMD 3800+ and Corsair PC6400 2GB set of memory to the one with most scores that gives points. 3. Is an open category, funny, extreme? Maybee we will se some 486 superpi ownage here..... The competition is finished on Sunday 15.04.2007. And soon afterwards we will have the winners ready. Its only open for people living in Norway. Due to prices for shipping. But feel free to post some results if you want non the less....

Im not saying you are cheating. I was just wondering what the trick was

I think that score seems a bit high asswell. Whats the trick couppi? Extreme pcie clocks? Could it be a unlocked card running as an GT? Here is my score. The card is clocked to 840/860. Dont look at the clocks in rivatuner there, its the 2D speed http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562267

Oops I was too late if you had your birthday yesterday, but congrats anyway...

Ahh very good, for the way it is now all teams have to have 10 members to get an ranking in each benchmark. And that is rather useless I think...

But teams with only 99 members then, wouldnt be ranked at all in the different benchmarks?? Like now if the team has 9 scores in a benchmark no ranking in that benchmark.

The wprime checksum gets invalid on all my scores, seem to be a bug in the benchmark if you ask me.

Yeah I totally understand the point of getting a battle in the top. But wouldnt it be more fun if there was like 5-10 teams fighting about the top. I dont see the point of getting a even bigger gap between XS, OCX and the rest of the teams. OCX teammembers needs to start benching 24/7 then we will se a real fight again And wee all know that diskusjon.no will rule them all... ehh....

Yeah I totaly agree! Would be really neat

Isnt the algorithm working that way now? Or is it just top3 scores with a popular hw item that gets bonuspoints now?