xxbassplayerxx
-
Posts
2171 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by xxbassplayerxx
-
-
@svictorcc, 500 FSB with a quad core is actually pretty high, especially for auto settings. If you're just trying to push your QX9650, you'll probably do better around 400 FSB and by using the multiplier.
-
1
-
-
I thought this was a joke thread. What benchmark are you talking about? What competition is the related to?
-
Only because there isn't a lulcatz benchmark that fills your screens with animated cat meme gifs til your PC reaches 100% CPU usage and records how long it takes...yeah some developer is going to copy that idea just you wait!
It's a bad benchmark because it's basically broken. It scales massively with CPU speed, it performs better when you run with less cores and HT turned off, etc. People don't really run it anymore.
-
-
Give it a try and report back!
-
As the pot gets cold, the rods get frosty and get stuck in the hold downs, which can make swapping processors or platforms difficult. Doubling the holes that the rods pass through is going to make this twice as difficult. I'd avoid it if possible.
This is more true with LN2 but can still be an issue with dry ice.
-
-
-
-
-
Bump. Entertaining reasonable offers.
-
I don't think there are very many people pushing E-Die right now but with B-Die, 4-Dimm boards wall around 1900 12-12-12 1T. Above that they require 2T.
-
Looks very nice!
-
Wow. Have the depths been changed to possibly deal with cracking/contact under the IHS?
-
Congratulations!!!! Which BIOS were you using? Also, RTL's seem quite odd which kept happening to me despite having them dialed in manually. Did you have them set to something or on auto?
-
Just because Marc didn't share... this was literally his first run going for 742.
-
@Digg_de, can you train with 49/50 RTLs? Maybe even lower? 48/49? Or 49/49?
-
Well cool then!
Question... anyone had issues installing Timing Configurator in stripped XP? Can't get it to go for some reason. v4.0.3
-
Weird... board setting them correctly?
-
Must not have gone through. No deleted posts in the thread... unless you mean you reported it. In that case, it wouldn't show up here.
-
Are you sure it posted originally? I'm not seeing anything on this page that has been deleted.
-
Mine ran full pot with no issue at all as long as it was in single channel and QPI volts weren't too high, but it was just a retail. The Q3FE chips weren't supposed to have that same issue... full pot with any QPI and full memory banks. At one point, the 980X top ranking was all Q3FE chips. After a while, people found strong retails that would run full pot or really close to it and the ranking has spread out since then.
[hwbot=2361553]submission[/hwbot]
Q3FE (A0):
[hwbot=1024341]submission[/hwbot]
[hwbot=987377]submission[/hwbot]
-
2
-
-
Wrong frequency in submission Nacho! I only noticed because it came up in a search for 5.0 GHz and less.
-
Hey Bullshooter, a lot of GT chips actually can go full pot. I had a B1 chip (retail) that could do it in single channel but as far as I was aware, all A0 (Early 2.40GHz ES samples) chips could do it. I'm trying to figure out why the one I was using couldn't.
[GUIDE] Skylake Memory Timings on Asus Motherboards !
in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)
Posted
I don't think that does anything other than validate what I'm saying. You ran memory and CPU speeds that are massively lower than the existing first place and somehow beat it. The benchmark is fucked.
Your 3110 12-13-13 isn't somehow faster than l0ud's 3900 11-16-16. As more evidence that no one runs this benchmark, people are doing 4080 12-11-11 with B-Die but no one has submitted a run to beat l0ud's, even though the frequencies are possible.