So here we are. Look at this results, and pls transfer it to good category.
3DMark 01
1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580818
Description: A64 3000+ @ 2910MHz - 7300GT @ 760/1880 - this isn't DDR2
2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580168
Description: Venice 3000+ @ 2700mhz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 785/1880 - next Galaxy DDR3 card in DDR2 category.
3DMark 03
1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570588
Description: Athlon64 Venice 3000+ @ 2916MHz - Galaxy GF7300GT 128MB @822/2050 - 2Ghz on DDR2 ? I don't think so...
2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573044
Description: Athlon64 Venice 3000+@2610mhz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 785/1880 + screen (riva tuner don't show mem freq in DDR)
3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559889
Description: AMD Athlon 64 3000+ @ 2570MHz - 7300GT @ 778/1810 - next ddr3 card
4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563341
Description: GeForce 7300GT @ 653/1692mhz Intel C2D E6300@2.74GHz - the same
5. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574806
Description: Intel pentium 4 506@4.2 - Galaxy 7300GT @ 648/1580 - ddr3...
3DMark 05
1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563340
Description: GeForce 7300GT @ 653/1692mhz Intel C2D E6300@2.74GHz - DDR3 card
2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588719
Description: Palit 7300GT @ 550/1700 mhz , A64 3500+ @ 2.45 GHz - next card with DDR3
3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572970
Description: Pentium D 805 @ 3.5Ghz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 570/1580 MHz - DDR3
3DMark 06
1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563813
Description: Palit 7300GT Sonic @ 550/1500 MHz - DDR3...
Aquamark
1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571945
Description: A64 @ 3010MHz - 7300GT 810/1810 - DDR3
2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590244
Description: 7300GT 600/1600, A64 3500+ Venice @ 2753MHz - another DDR3 card.
I think this isn't their fault. Only bot bad read the clocks from description
Please transfer this results to good category :]
Sorry for my bad english but it isn't my native language [;