Lanc

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725158 - E8500 in E2160 cat.

Hmm, there is a problem with a bot. Those users add scores only via board, and bot read 9800GX2 and HD3870 X2 as 7300GT DDR3. New results from this user in 7300GT. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723597 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723207 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723209 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723627 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723626

9800GX2 results in 7300GT category... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723196 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723199 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723201 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723202 8800 and HD3870X2 in 7300GT. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719615 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718131

And what about rest of the results reported ?

We have about 600+ ppl in our team. It is possible that some of that ppl can't do good screens

We need more moderators... I think people who reports many result can be new moderators (if they want).

Yeach. o polonos are veeery good mod from moderators crew ^^ W koncu to Polak Pozdro

This all results below is a 6800GS results in 6800 category ;] So pls fix it. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590266 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589570 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551933 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522498 And this is SLI score. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621405 He has too low CPU and GPU clocks to get 20k on single card

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639008 - need more proof, he probably run 3dmark in very low resolution - becouse second man in this category have C2D @ 4Ghz and high clocked card and have only 11k.

Last one DDR3 in 3DMark 05 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577637 Congrats to hwbot crew (especially Massman) for very good job ! :]

Nice one !

No problem There is more DDR3 in 3DMark 03 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554834 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559888 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576502 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563971 And two more in 3DMark 05 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577635 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594440 That's all for now ;P

I see Massman you clean now Aquamark and 3DMark 06 in 7300GT DDR2, but there is also another results in 01/03/05 3DMarks I can help you with it. 3DMark 05 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563340 - ddr3 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572970 - the same http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577634 - --|-- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561008 - --|-- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589517 - --|-- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554832 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576461 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594440

So here we are. Look at this results, and pls transfer it to good category. 3DMark 01 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580818 Description: A64 3000+ @ 2910MHz - 7300GT @ 760/1880 - this isn't DDR2 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580168 Description: Venice 3000+ @ 2700mhz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 785/1880 - next Galaxy DDR3 card in DDR2 category. 3DMark 03 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570588 Description: Athlon64 Venice 3000+ @ 2916MHz - Galaxy GF7300GT 128MB @822/2050 - 2Ghz on DDR2 ? I don't think so... 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573044 Description: Athlon64 Venice 3000+@2610mhz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 785/1880 + screen (riva tuner don't show mem freq in DDR) 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559889 Description: AMD Athlon 64 3000+ @ 2570MHz - 7300GT @ 778/1810 - next ddr3 card 4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563341 Description: GeForce 7300GT @ 653/1692mhz Intel C2D E6300@2.74GHz - the same 5. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574806 Description: Intel pentium 4 506@4.2 - Galaxy 7300GT @ 648/1580 - ddr3... 3DMark 05 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563340 Description: GeForce 7300GT @ 653/1692mhz Intel C2D E6300@2.74GHz - DDR3 card 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588719 Description: Palit 7300GT @ 550/1700 mhz , A64 3500+ @ 2.45 GHz - next card with DDR3 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572970 Description: Pentium D 805 @ 3.5Ghz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 570/1580 MHz - DDR3 3DMark 06 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563813 Description: Palit 7300GT Sonic @ 550/1500 MHz - DDR3... Aquamark 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571945 Description: A64 @ 3010MHz - 7300GT 810/1810 - DDR3 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590244 Description: 7300GT 600/1600, A64 3500+ Venice @ 2753MHz - another DDR3 card. I think this isn't their fault. Only bot bad read the clocks from description Please transfer this results to good category :] Sorry for my bad english but it isn't my native language [;

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601763 2x Radeon 9500 ? Transfer this result to single card, becouse this is unreal to have 2x 9500 on 1 mainboard ;]