-
Posts
3651 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TaPaKaH
-
-
-
-
it's more interesting that module 3 survived 2.05V+, usually these chips don't last longer than a few seconds at anything above 1.95
-
Allendale is a funky core in terms of use consistency.
1) There are G0 versions of E2140 and E2160. Technically, these are Conroe-4M.
Should these be allowed?
I don't think it would matter. I tried thousands of these and haven't seen any that would have any competitive advantage over a good M0 chip.2) There are L2/M0 versions of E6300, E6400, Xeon 3040 and Xeon 3050. Technically, these are Allendale-2M.
Should these be allowed? I don't think it would matter either.
Unless you are TAGG, you'll never find an L2/M0 that would bench above 4.5GHz so you're much better off running a random E2180+ / E4400+.I'd say just pick a random stance on either of these questions and no one should complain
- 1
- 4
-
I assume it's a guess based on
- additional voltage doing nothing
- being able to bench within 100 MHz of your suicide clocks
- 1
-
-
Getting a DFI board to boot custom settings is an achievement on its own. Let alone at any semi-interesting clockspeeds.
-
Wasn't disabling SLI the oldest multi-card trick in the book for 01?
Quite a few 01 world records in the G80/G92/GT200 era, including my own, were set this way and no one ever complained.
- 1
-
The value of points has been massively diluted with recent algorithm changes (talk about 200% inflation).
And overclocking couldn't be any less relevant for practical consumers.
So might as well do nothing (i.e. keep) as it wouldn't matter. -
You can run the game tests in any order, as long as you eventually complete all 7 (technically 6, you don't need Nature to get a score).
This allows to set different clock speeds (and other settings) for specific tests. Also, running certain tests first increases FPS more than others. Also, some tests are not deterministic producing a slightly different score each time you try it.
-
7-6-5 would be faster, but good luck finding dual-sided D9GTR capable of these clock speeds.
- 1
-
-
ASUS C4E, judging by CPU-Z validation
-
you finally did it!
-
No respect for the old man Albrecht
-
How is this not under 10 mins with that CPU and NB clocks?
-
Get gold first, then downclock while still gold? :D
-
Back in the day getting 8GHz was a big deal. These days it won't even get you in the Top 100.
Good job nevertheless!
-
They scale anywhere between 0 and 30 MHz. Haven't seen negative scaling.
-
Netburst have it. It's easy to see if you have an unlocked one. It's also relatively easy to observe when your max suicide clocks are only 20-30 MHz higher than your 32M clocks irrespective of voltage.
-
Many CPUs have an FSB wall. Much like Conroes do (where lowering multi allows to expose it). That's why you see little scaling.
-
Another one bites the dust
-
9 seconds to go til the fastest 32M on s478
-
You lose almost nothing in performance, but on many CPUs you get higher clocks and/or better CB.
TAGG - Mobile Pentium 4 552 @ 6005.7MHz - 6005.69 MHz CPU Frequency
in Result Discussions
Posted