Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

rZyn17

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rZyn17

  1. If someone could please take the time to change my nick from (why I had what I have now, I have no clue) to rZyn17 I would really appreciate it. Thanks!!
  2. rZyn17

    Wrong Category

    This person submitted wrong 2 different ways. 1) E5620 was submitted in a E5645 Category 2) CPU 1 and CPU 2 show different cores/threads for the same cpu? Total core is 10 then, should be in 10x? Thanks http://hwbot.org/submission/2270008_the_wolf_wprime_32m_2x_xeon_e5645_3sec_93ms
  3. worked perfect!! THANKS. Good ole AAA . A lways A wesome A ndre
  4. Having issues booting together... isn't a joke, I really have chip in hand, tried 4 different bios versions with no luck. going to call ASUS tomorrow but hoping for a possible fix now. Asus states board will work with next gen cpu... Really excited to get this going. Let me know Thanks
  5. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2152246_miho_aquamark_rage_128_pro_agp4x_806_marks That needs to be moved too... Thanks
  6. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/605996_turrican_3dmark2001_se_rage_128_pro_1750_marks http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2196339_miho_3dmark2001_se_rage_128_pro_agp4x_1331_marks ^^^^ Same cards in 2 different categories.. Matter of fact those 2 categories have all different types of Rage cards. This is why the results are so different even with a much higher freq cpu is used.
  7. The above is obvious, however, you are missing my point. When I grabbed that screenshot I merely forgot to put the 2001se details in it. Kind of like if you have 3x cpu-z's up and you forget to have 1 on memory and instead have 2 of the 3 on the cpu tab and 1 on the motherboard tab. When overclocking one spends a lot of time on his/her submissions. To be taken out just like that for that little reason is a joke. I had a lot of details on that screenshot. Shit, I took up the whole screen. Look for the cheaters, not the opps, I missed that. Again, the guy ahead of me with that stupid stock 2.6 northwood was almost twice as fast as me, "should be the one looked at". This site has pissed me off since I started anyway.. About to pack it up.
  8. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/1087415_christian_ney_3dmark2000_radeon_7500_aiw_8502_marks That is not a ATI AIW in his picture Proof one makes a mistake once in awhile, now the score I had I will be unable to achieve again because the items have been used for a friends build and also sold. All I did is forget details on a 3dmark01 se submission but yet I included the planet and all. Here it is http://hwbot.org/submission/2183762_dect6.0_3dmark2001_se_rage_128_pro_agp4x_817_marks Not gonna cheat on 1.5 points especially when this is the one I complained about some dude beating me with a northwood processor ^^^^ post is not far below this one.....
  9. Well, I just threw in my Abit IC7 board, fresh XP install, same drivers, same programs. Stock P 4 @ 2.8 w/ht and set my ati card to 172/172 and got a score of 835. So I have no clue whats going on. So just delete the above.... I give up
  10. This should be enough proof... We know a Pentium D @ 3.66 will wax a P 4 @ 2.66. And a Deneb @ 3.4 will wax both put together. All driver and all features are setup for the Pentium D to run correctly, and the best I can get is 708ish. How the heck do I push something to get double the score when having better hardware and settings then the person in 1st place. Plus loose with a AM2 Deneb setup. This is a tad bit different then newer hardware because there is much much more headroom. But chances are if you have the same video card clocked the same with a 2600k vs a 965 amd, the 2600k in 3dmark01 will spank the amd. <- example Must have something to do with him having a different Rage 128 Pro 4x card.. Mine is suppose to be the top Rage 128pro 4x card next to the furry maxx(which is dual qpu). It has to be, it is the only different card listed in the 5 posts... A Ati Rage 128 Pro 4XL must be a ton faster then a Ati Rage 128 Pro Ultra 4x, even though my core clock is higher. I have a bad *ss Abit IC7 Socket 478 board and a P4 2.66. I will dry ice that biatch and overlock my Rage Ultra card, and I bet I will be lucky to hit the 708 I hit with my Pentium D
  11. I will upload a screen shot of my P D @ 3.7 run with the above card. shows 4x enabled with actual ati drivers. Give me a bit...
  12. So, updated drivers, performance options set, running a P D @ 3.4. score of 618 in 3dmark01. Video card at 172/172 via powerstrip @ 4x with various other options set in XP PRO. This makes sense, with the settings above with a AM2 board and a Deneb overclocked to 3.4 I score 817. How is this guy getting 1331? Something is fishy. lol, I sound like a dork. A Ati Rage 128pro 4xl has twice the performance of a Ati Rage 128 Pro Ultra 4x? Usually the processors packs the most punch in 3dmark01 if running close to the same cards.
  13. Please see this http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2196339_miho_3dmark2001_se_rage_128_pro_agp4x_1331_marks The above is 1st place... Here is mine, 2 place... http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2183762_dect6.0_3dmark2001_se_rage_128_pro_agp4x_817_marks I find it hard to believe a stock p4 is going to take my deneb at 3.4, by that many points.. I know 3dmark01 is a single core app but I had it all setup for such. I am 90% sure I was running 4x mode too. I am going to retry this with a P D @ 3.4 and a 775 board Update: something is wrong here... the guy in 4th place I believe is running a Northwood P4 also at something like 3.6...
  14. Please add the following motherboard.... Epox EP-8NPA SLI Socket 754 board w/SLI ..... Netto.... http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1954345 THANKS!!!
  15. http://www.digital-daily.com/motherboard/abit-kr7a/ I take that the above won't work.. If not, when I get to it I will try to get a link, hopefully CPU-Z will see it correctly... Thanks
  16. Hello... I have a Abit KR7A (not the raid version which would be KR7A-RAID) that I would like added. It is based off the VIA chipset. Anything else needed? Thanks
  17. Just curious if you could lead me in the right direction for "Phase Change" cascade type devices.

  18. Also, whats the deal with this picture rule. If I don't add a picture to my results it will not count towards my Enthusiast League? Might I have a bit more details on the above? What are my overclock results pertaining too then? I am thinking this doesn't matter until my first subzero submission? Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...