mr.paco
-
Posts
820 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by mr.paco
-
-
Can you please add this FOXCONN 2AB7 AM3 motherboard and onboard/IGP ATI RADEON 3000 gpu to the data base?
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/v6e2x
Thank you...
-
Very nice Kotori-san...
-
1
-
-
On 4/26/2018 at 4:15 AM, richba5tard said:
Anyone found a broken ranking?
Not sure if it falls under the recalculation or something else, but my Road to Pro points dont show. If I understand it correctly I should be showing 70.4 for my chosen Division-1 under my World Ranking for the past year.
-
1
-
-
v3.1 & v3.2 now work. Yes it was the reduction size. Will only run with 256 or less.
Thank you for the help and the great work youre doing with the program.
-
Hi Mat,
I can not figure out why I keep getting error and unable to run versions 3.1 or 3.2. I can however successfully run version 2.3.4.
7700K & RX 470 @ stock Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-
I was looking to make some submissions but noticed an error.
The Abit BP6 is a Dual s370 motherboard but the Bot has it listed as a SLOT-1 motherboard.
-
Or let us use the quadro model of the destop part and the desktop gpu's.
aka.
FX 1700 = 8600 GT
FX 3700 = 8800 GT / 8800 GTS 512
FX 4600 = 8800 GTX
FX 5600 = 8800 Ultra
FX 4800 / CX = GTX 260 55nm version
FX 5800 = GTX 285
....
Respectable
-
Have a few I could send your way.
Thanx Ales, will let you know.
-
just a id .
use gpu's like quadro's , tesla and fire pro and ditch desktop gpu's
Speaking for myself;
Leave in the DeskTop GPUs.
-
In my personal opinion, I would be in favour of ES chips being allowed for this. It is an OC competition, after all.
If all are in agreement, I dont see why not. Lets do it up :nana:
-
That's a good point. I do like the notion of retaining some element of era-appropriateness, so how about opening up the GPU requirements to say 2-3 eligible generations per stage rather than forcing just the one? Would that help?
Most definitely that would work great :ws:
-
There is absolutely nothing wrong with restricting to specific CPU cores or GPU in it self, was referring to how GPUs are restricted along with the restricted CPUs.
As for ES chips. I cant say either way
But at the end of the day; what ever brings em in works for me
-
I think he meant, no 771 come in 8-core based on my questions to Dead Things.
-
I think Dead Things meant it like this:
Thanx for making it clear for me, my old brain has seen better days
-
What no 8 socket stages???
I do like it.
Personally I wouldn't have limited so much like specific cpu cores AND/WITH a specific gpus. Just to allow more to play that may have limited server HW and combinations, but if thats what it takes then I'm all in where ever I fit in
If all goes well this go around there will be chances to mix things up other ways
Question; Like on 939/940
stage 3 - 2 cores on 2 sockets: I understand this as a total of 2 dual-core cpus one in each socket. Correct?
But then in stage 4- 4 cores on 2 sockets: I understand it as a Quad-core cpus in each socket
. I maybe wrong, but 939/940 dont come in Quad core.Then on 775/771
stage 3- 4 cores on 2 sockets: I understand this a quad-cpu in each socket, Correct?
But then you have stage 4- 8 cores on 2 sockets: I understand this as an 8-core cpu in each socket. As far as I know there are no 8-core 771 cpus
-
I fully agree - and this is how Jumper envisioned this thing to begin with in the OP. Would give us all a chance to focus in on a platform for a while and eek out as much performance from it as we can. The more I toy with ideas in my tiny brain, the more I keep coming back to this round-by-socket formula.
I may have misread it, but his actual request was to try and have a sever stage included in one of next big comps like Team Cup or Country Cup.
What we are trying to do here is put together a server only comp
-
Pretty much that would limit it to 2 to 4 socket types correct?
Popular or not there are a lot of server socket types that some may have that others may not.
How about if everyone here each create 2-stages consisting of 5 benches each stage of whatever HW, Bechmark, limitations they would like to have included in the comp.
So far we have:
Jumper118, Dead Things, yosarianilives, unityofsaints, mr.paco, skulstaton, havli.
I believe that with the input of others that havent shown up yet should pretty much make most happy ( not all) with the out come.
That way everyone here can have what they want in the comp.
-
The one thing we have to keep in mind is that you cant have a comp based solely on what you or I may have.
It must be open as much as possible to allow for others that may have different HW to enjoy themselves as well.
Example being some of the HW I laid out in the comp I dont have, but it wont stop me from participating with what I do have
.We still have a few months to go before we try to get this up n running, so between now n then the stages and HW are open for any type of change &/or adjustments. I set it up just to get this going, because we can discus it all day n night but if nothing gets started it wont go any where.
I know not everyone will like what we end up with but thats always the case. I just want to see as many as can show up. Not very interested in a 1 or 2 man comp.
-
Sorry for chiming in so late on this. Wondered if there might be merit in looking at specific cores in some of these cases?
Dempsey is a far cry from Harpertown on S771, for example, so each might be deserving of its own stage - not to mention the myriad of cores in between. Barcelona/Istanbul on S1207, MC/AD on G34, Sledge/Italy on S940 - also good examples where one realistically cannot compete against the other, hence maybe deserving of a unique stage.
I wouldn't necessarily wanna get locked into only ever benching one set of chips for each platform but instead having a chance to investigate a number of different generations on each. I mean not always - but some of the time. Thoughts?
Always eager to hear from a fellow server enthusiast
Without limiting too many stages too much
, how would you include some of what you suggested here?:Stage 1:
SINGLE SOCKET (0ne CPU)
939 (opterons only) SP1
G34 x265 1080P
775 (xeon only) PiFast
2011 x265 4K
STAGE 2:
DUAL SOCKET (2 CPUs)
940 = 3DM03 (any single GPU)
G34 = 3DM06 (any single GPU)
1207 = 3DM11 (any single GPU)
771 = Fire Strike (any single GPU)
1366 = Vantage ( no limit on GPU count)
2011 = GPUpi (no limit on GPU count)
STAGE 3
TRIPLE SOCKET (3 CPUs)
Any socket that can run 3 CPUs = GPUpi 1B for CPU
Stage 4
Quad Socket (4 PUs)
1207 CB15
G34 y-cruncher 10b
2011 GeekBench Multi-Core
1567 Wprime1024
Stage 5
Bring what you got, no number of cpu limits any server socket(s) goes
1: GPUpi 100m
2: RealBench HWbot
3: CB11
-
Ok so now who's gonna come up with n design the background
? -
A very very good point
If it turns out to be a TEAM comp, most definetly one person can submit in each n every stage as many times as needed.
The need to have multiple different members will not be the case here. If you are a 1 man/woman team or a team of 100+ members makes no difference.
I believe the best option would be to make it a MEMBER comp this go.
Yes look to have it for early next year if possible.
-
I have no issue with it being a TEAM comp. Lets see what a few others think.
Theme names you got seem fine to me.
Will give it a few more days for additional input from others and then will present it and see what Websmiles thinks of the idea.
-
Should be really fun, I'll be super interested in this comp if it goes. Although we'll have to see for 4p if I can sub all stages. Should have a lot of fun on 2p and 1p.
Cool
...Any one interested and has an idea on anything they would like to see added, removed &/or changed this go around, please voice your thoughts. The more input the better.
Really would like to this happen
Any thoughts on a theme name?
Should it be a TEAM comp or a MEMBER comp?
-
Other than that my only question is does pin mod qx9775 count as a xeon?
Well since it is a s771 cpu its allowed.
I know the Skultrail was sold as a desktop but it still fit in with what we are doing as do all 771 cpus
HWBOT Rev7.1 point recalculation in progress
in HWBOT News
Posted
Fascinating...
I can count on one hand the number of TEAMS here that bench for & fight for their TEAM, most other members here at Bot bench solely for them-SELF points/rankings and to hell with their team. Prove me wrong... And that is just fine for them.
So Out of pure curiosity; What is the sudden interest in TEAM points/rankings. Hmmmmm.
It has been mostly catering to crying individual benchers here anyway again nothing wrong with that, if thats their thing so be it. However why go after TEAMS points/rankings? Some individuals here can not compete on a one to one basis on the higher levels so they focus on and contribute to their TEAM the only way they can. And you want to again... Kill the concept of TEAM as it has been attempted before in the past.
If the TEAM PP have been the same way all these years and no one had a complaint about it before why change it? I do understand if the BenchMark was completely removed from Bott.