mr.paco
-
Posts
820 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by mr.paco
-
-
Not sure if any one is aware but there used to be a TAB to view the Over-All Rankings (yesterday it was there), but no longer see it. Shows the tabs for each SubComp but not the over all Team Cup Rankings.
-
Can you submit straight from the XTU application?
I imagine it might be some issue related to Sandy Bridge architecture and profile export. Perhaps try version 5.2.0.14
Yes I tryed via XTU as well as manual via Bot.
Will give v-5.2.0.14 a shot.
-
Will PM you the file
The version in use is 6.0.2.8
No way to attach the file in PM
-
In need of some help.
I have been trying over and over to get an XTU submission in SC2/S1 but for what ever reason it just will not submit.
I tryed submitting from XTU, Manual, various browsers, re-ran it several times and nothing. They show up in my XTU profile on Bot but thats it.
When I try manual, I get There is an issue with the supplied data file. Please try again, if the problem persists contact the HWBOT crew.
Here is the submission if I can get some help getting it submitted would be greatly appreciated.
Intel Core i5-2400S CPU @ 3500.0MHz - 604 XTU marks on HWBOT
*MrPACO
-
How about limiting the quadros by Core? I would propose G96 or older, it will be easier for me and participants plus you have dx10 for vantage from g80 upwards.
Overclocking, overclocking, and much more! Like overclocking.
Generally, you did a very good and fast job, I am looking forward to round 3
No problem; Will make Quadros G96 or older.
I wanted to have it up as soon as I could to be able to get all questions/concerns/complaints out of the way so that once it starts there are no hick-ups/problems . At least that was my thinking
I hope its well accepted by everyone.
Thank you for the opportunity...
-
Why don't we make round 4 even more interesting? In stage 1 there is 1, maybe 2 CPU models to be used, let's narrow it to Thunderbird or Palomino core to make it more difficult Cinebench will be dominated by dual Athlon MP (or modded XP), so maybe result can be divided by number of cores? And for 2001... maybe a clock limit of 2500?
I tryed to put it together to allow for as many participants as possible with out having too many limitations or making too easy.
I only submitted my idea, it will have to be up to WebSmiles to change anything he deems necessary.
-
Looks good, you got PM regarding two points, apart from this I am very happy with the build up
Has been update.
Let me know how it looks now.
-
I sent Frank a PM, we need to make a few adjustments like limit age of quadros, there are modern M5000s iirc for 10k we all do not want to see, but he did an awesome job so far
I will make the needed adjustments shortly.
-
I'm sure I'm not the only one or the last one
-
Round-1: s771 (771 to 775 mod allowed)/Quadro G96 core or older Single GPU only
Stage-1: Maxmem Read BandWidth
Stage-2: 3D06
Stage-3: Vantage
Round-2 All S939 (Opterons allowed)/GF7 (multi GPU allowed)
Stage-1 Cine bench 11.5 (divided by core count)
Stage-2 Ice Storm
Stage-3 Realbench
Round-3 s478/Matrox
Stage-1 Wprime 1024
Stage-2 3D03
Stage-3 PCM04
Round-4 s462/GF2
stage-1 CPU Frequency (Percentage of OC)
Stage-2 3D01
Stage-3 Cine Bench 03
Round-5 Slot 1/Slot A/s7 //Rage
Stage-1 Slot 1 and Rage 3DMark 99
Stage-2 Slot A SPI 1m
Stage-3 Socket-7 HWBprime
Multi-Socket allowed where applicable.
-
Not sure if this has been brought up.
I am aware that Bot had a crash (or 2) in the past and as such a lot of submissions screen shots were damaged &/or lost.
Unfortunately there folks that dont know/understand/realize that and are constantly reporting OLD submissions quoting "No screen shot". Or worse, see that there was a screen shot but it is a damaged file and still report it.
Example of an older submission that obviously has/had a screen shot but was damaged. Yet was still reported.
Not sure how this can be addressed; Maybe a bot generated generic screenshot saying something like "ScreenShot Check n Valid"
-
OK, Cool...
-
How much time is given to get the info together?
-
Guessing radeon 2000 series, what was the second?
LOL
...second, DDR-4
... -
If understanding you correctly; because you dont own a better or particular cpu you would like to have them change the system to suit YOU and what YOU own. Thats a new one.
Not every one can enter every competition because no one has every piece of hardware ever made.
They try to make comps as flexible as possible when they can to allow as many as possible to participate. Just sometimes you dont have what it takes may it be the hardware or the time.
There will always be someone complaining about one thing or another because they (Bot Team) can not please EVERYONE. But they definitely do try.
-
-
Thank you
... -
-
Weird, this was not removed by staff, maybe a bug. We will check this
-
Happy Birthday Christian
-
Pretty much something along these lines:
Similar to what you see in each individual members profile now but with a twist.
For TEAM version
when you click HARDWARE LIBRARY TAB the view shows the hardware on left as it does now but instead of showing how many submission was made on the right it shows the number of team members that have that piece of HW.
When you click on that number
the next page lists all the members by name that have that HW on the left and the number of submissions they made with it on the right.
when you click on the number of submissions made for a given member it then shows a list like it does now; each submission that member made.
Also like the idea of a tick box of sort to indicate if that piece of HW is still owned or not
I can not say if this is something easy or not to implement, (way above my pay grade
) but would surly go a long way in aiding teams.Like anything else; its just an idea...
-
Anyway people sells hardware so maybe they don't have it anymore, don't know how effective would it be...
Its very well known that some members sell/trade/kill/buy hardware everyday.
If thats the the case; same thing can be said for the Individual members HardWare library.
A lot of folks here dont really care what the other members on their team have cause they pretty much bench for themselves not the team, especially those teams that have hundreds if not thousands of members. But then you have TEAMs that rely & work with each other and having a list of all members hardware in one place would help and benefit those teams
-
This would be such a fantastic addition.
Would make things so much easier for teams when prepping for team comps, purchasing new HW etc with out having to go to each and every members library back forth to compare n see who has what.
Is this possible?
-
OK. Will do. Makes perfect sense.
But also keep in mind that when new OCers/Benchers enter the scene they wont know or realize these things when submitting datafiles.
Old school Season 3 preparation thread
in HWBOT Competitions
Posted
It was not that easy to come up with the choice of platforms to use. My goal was to open it up to as many participants as possible with out making it too hard or too easy or too complicated.
Sure I could have gone with socket-8 or socket-5 that are even older than s370, point being there are more options to go with but couldnt add em all with out making it ridiculously over the top and driving the bot staff crazy
.
I just hope you and everyone else will participate and have fun.