sin0822
-
Posts
757 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by sin0822
-
-
I mean he joined 11 months ago, that whole thing happened like 6 months ago. I bet it could be him, maybe he wanted to find a hobby where he didn't have to leave his house? haha
-
ahh okay cool, just didn't know who it was
-
The guy who found this issue and brought it to attention said hes a German overclocker who had access to 200+ Skylake CPUs, anyone know who he is?
-
Ahh, Okay I haven't tried a non-K chip yet, but one should be in my hands tomorrow. I will check to see if AVX instruction increase the voltage Thanks for the tip!
-
Thanks @sin0822. I saw the guide pop by on Facebook - looks very nice!
Request: can you have a look at the relationship between the AVX instruction set and power management for Skylake? I recall AVX performance increasing the Vcore on Haswell-E CPUs and based on the Skylake non-K unlocking it seems there is a direct relationship.
So I plan to add a section on non-K OC using Supermicro's C7Z170-OCE since it's an OC board and Supermicro did have that BIOS first. I will look at it there.
I know that AVX does seem to have a pretty big impact. A quick glance at the LLC results (each boards' page has LLC tests) I test maximum load with CINEBENCH R11.5 (I don't think it has AVX) and then I also do Intel Burn Test with AVX. Of course the load of IBT itself could just raise or lower voltages more, but obviously there is a large increase in power considering the increases in voltages when utilizing positive LLC and decreases with negative LLC levels.
I will look into a more consistent way to test this out and the impacts on power management.
There might also be an impact depending on the voltage mode used, but i would think that with non-K OC you would use manual mode instead of adaptive or offset since the frequency doesn't drop. Using LLC on manual is there, but can be negated depending on the LLC of the board.
You want to know whats really crazy, all the five boards I used in the article (and including the Supermicro #6) all use the same PWM! lol, you would think their LLC would be quite similar, but its greatly differs between brands (two brands are quite close tho).
BTW thanks!
-
Here is mine: http://www.tweaktown.com/guides/7481/tweaktowns-ultimate-intel-skylake-overclocking-guide/index.html
I aimed to make it much more basic in the beginning, and then offer more pertinent information later, and then try and offer something different.
-
Where did you get the patent? just curious.
Also, question, how do you plan to combat companies that offer 3D printing for user submitted STL files? Already on OCN people have taken the original STL and paid online 3d printing companies to print it.
-
I have one...HS looks like new
Nice !
-
honestly, i 3d printed the other STL and I am currently building my own b/c the other needs to be sanded. Why are you guys hating on the 3D printed model?
-
Why would you use this design of a block moving and delidding the CPU, how would that work with plastic 3D printing? The screw would just go into the block unless you add some type of metal stopper. Why not make the block solid and push the bodies together like the other 3D printed design?
-
There's really no need to defend your product or its pricing, Roman. I don't know why you keep bothering haha.
In the end, yours is the only on the market that allows for 100% infinite delids. As said before, the price is less than a third of the cost of a new CPU after a failed delid. In addition, the material used and build quality is solid.
If people want to print on for $10, fine. If they want to buy a printed one for $25, that's fine. If they want yours for 90, that's fine too.
Thanks for giving people who want to buy advanced tools the opportunity. I think we all too quickly forget about the difficulties of getting our hands on low quantity OC tools ...
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Exactly.
-
Hey Alex,
I think you did a great job. Also I don't agree with hiding information to make it challenging, there is literally no guide on tweaking tertiaries for DDR4, plus isn't not like he wrote a guide on "How to Splave" and beat Splave at his own game in the HOT comp. He just wanted to share his knowledge of one of the more intimidating areas of DRAM overclocking, where things differ a lot, and he gave advice on how to overcome odds that give people headaches and make them burn motherboards and set them afloat on lakes. There is a reason that ROG guys release those LN2 benching guides at launch, there is no reason for them to hide the information, as if they make it more public on their platform people will buy it. It's the same thing as DRAm timing profiles they had, I bet a lot of money that boosted their ROG sales a tiny bit as well.
Anyways nice job Alex, people always going to find problems, and there is always room for improvement.
-
Primary researches on the matter were conducted a few years ago:
http://www.overclockers.ru/lab/41032/poisk-i-testirovanie-alternativ-termopasty.html
use google translate
:banana:
lol
-
I am also not able to validate like before, it does seem that the program is putting more load on the system, I think if you enable the XOC it is less, but still I can't get the same validations I could before.
-
Whatever, what a pain. Why bother loading the CPU with this xtreme OC thing? Isn't the point not to have a load?
Also how to get this feature where it saves validation file every 3sec>? I tried with set to 0 and 1 and neither saves every 3 sec
-
Its funny, Intel designed Haswell with an FIVR and manufactures end up giving these CPUs the most VRs (granted most aren't switching VRs) I have seen for a single CPU.
-
see you guys there
-
Massman are you putting together a list of events and such?
-
-
Tested lazy mod three times with different size of solder and it never works on my 5820K ES with SOC Force Rev1.0,first boot after soldering always failed(don't remenber the post code) but second/next boots were goods and when I unmount CPU the solder seems to had melt again
interesting maybe its different for the 6-core CPUs.
-
is it just me or does 05 gives a hard time matching a certain score?...it's soooooo random
I had +2 and -2 already but next run --> +/- 100 points....well there is still some time left so re-run, re-run, re-run...
@Massman don't blame the server, according to what I know from servers, dbs and stuff this lag is caused by all the other multiple submissions not just the one sending it (server actually doesn't care where the data comes from, it just reserves IDs and starts to handle them first-in, first-out!)..
my first result in stage 1 took 38 seconds to be accepted because there have been like 20-40 results in queue from others...I only sended one single result and it lagged like never before...If everybody only submits one result -> less/no lag -> no problem
Yea don't blame server, if the server can't handle it(then fix the servers, I think you have some sort of obligation, they are still broke from the last issues I told you about Pieter) let the forums handle it, they have time stamped posts. That is how we handled these types of comps back in the day, forum time stamps.
-
Connected the other 2 sets of pad locations plus this one to on board POS cap
Still waiting to hear back from HQ if we can release the full mod
any updates?
-
I honestly didn't know it was possible not to do it the way I posted, but I guess its possible to do it this way, just like its possible to milk a cat.
-
Id say you guys change rules so that a score is released at the start of each stage as the score to match.
Computex 2016
in Offtopic
Posted
Ill be there