Antinomy
-
Posts
1985 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
52
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Antinomy
-
-
Great score! How many mods done?
-
10 hours ago, Strunkenbold said:
The 3700+ results still missing out.
I've got such a CPU so I'll check when I power my 939 testbed.
-
https://valid.x86.fr/gzixlx
So finally Franck released a beta with this fix. I've sent him feedback and I hope it'll get into stable release as well.
If anyone's interested I also have photo of a de-lidded CPU of this type sent by ultra_code. You can clearly see Toledo die compared to much smaller San Diego.-
1
-
-
Quote
Hello, Franck!
There are two CPUs that aren't documented anywhere and CPU-Z identifies them wrong.
ADA4000DKA5CF and ADA3700DKA5CF, identified as San Diego DH-E6.Take a look at the table.
First, the part number, it's different. Meaning AMD sold it as a different part (they sometimes sold CPUs with different cores under one part number).
Second, the CPUID, it's different but this is because the revision is different.
And now the (al)most interesting - extended model. For E4 it's 27 and for E6 it's 37. But this is not the case for Venice - both E3 and E6 have same 2F model. Meaning it's the same core, but different revisions. And for our 3700/4000+ there are different ext. models.
And the most important - stepping. The stepping code is like a silicon batch.
So here are the stepping codes for several CPUs:
A64 X2 4800+ Toledo: ACBWE CCB2E CCBWE LCB9E LCBIE
A64 4000+ E6: CCBWE LCB9E LCBBE LCBIE
A64 4000+ E4: AABHE CABGE CABHE KAB1E KAB2E KAB3E KABYE KACAE
Summing this up - AMD produced a CPU with a different p/n, different ext. model number and with steppings same a Toledo CPUs. Meaning this indeed is a Toledo core.
Moreover, according to AMD revision guide (where we don't see our CPUs unfortunately):.png.302e02815e27ef9d513222aba18b9b55.png)
but if they were, they'd be in the last line (same core as Toledo) but with their own CPUID (F72) meaning their stepping is JH-E6. JH stands for dual-core die.I attach you a txt report of such a CPU (sinle core Toledo).Please, fix displayed core name and stepping name (JH-E6) for them.
Thank you in advance!
-
5
-
-
12 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:
Isn't M1rror right?
No. San Diego is a single-core die. The E6 isn't, it's a cut-off dual-core die. I'll post a copy of my letter to author of CPU-Z. I've just sent him another e-mail as a reminder. Sometimes he agrees to apply fixes but doesn't do it.
-
On 7/1/2023 at 6:55 PM, life_in_the_shadow said:
Please add ITRZ g41fbal2 g41
-
Raptor benching Raptor after all these years.
-
What is OM? 0,11um tech. proc?
-
2
-
-
Congratulations, TAGG!
Do you think the 815 is better? OPB thought that 808 is the one to go for.
-
Outstanding score, congratulations!
-
Wow, Kazakhstan overclocking is not dead. ? Nice score!
-
1
-
-
55 minutes ago, johnwshek1218 said:
does it make a difference or is there an advantage to using one OS over another
Yes. Which one exactly depends on HW and benchmark.
-
Very nice! But I'm sure you can do even better.
-
2 hours ago, Strunkenbold said:
@liqmet please stop reporting these subs except you know for 100 % the correct CPU.
Since I'm not the only one pissed off.
@liq_met, some more false, minor or reports without a proper description and you'll be doing homework for quite some time.
-
1
-
-
Congratulations! Good to see someone finally benchmarking again instead of ranting.
-
5 hours ago, Strunkenbold said:
Best bet would be 866A though (133 x 6,5) Bad mobo probably fails to run anything over 100 Mhz
I totally agree. It's the VIA 691 chipset, it doesn't support FSB133 at all. You can see 66/100 silk print on the PCB.
Feel free to move it.
-
1
-
-
So close! Congratulations, excellent score.
-
Very nice! Could you run AIDA to check memory read/write/latency?
-
Crazy CPU! What mods have been used for this result?
-
Do you know what OVERclocking is? ))
-
2
-
-
On 11/19/2022 at 1:01 AM, IdeaFix said:
SL8JX (EM64T, NX/xD??)
This one hasn't been confirmed to have EMT64. Haven't seen a single result with it too.
Only SL7QB and SL7Q8 are fully capable of running 64-bit OS.
https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/running-win10-by-intel-s478-cpu-now-and-maybe-older-cpu-in-the-future.81451/page-5#post-1637849 -
@windwithmehi! Any chances to see your old MoBo, CPU, memory reviews from s939, AM2, 775 era? Most links are dead of without screenshots.
-
On 9/30/2022 at 7:45 AM, _mat_ said:
Edit: I have not tried it on XP or without my RAMDisk.
Any chances to see a stand-alone and preferrably WinXP-compatible RAMDisk implementation? Would really like to compare your techniques to classic ones.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, TAGG said:
Did you find any way to fix hwinfo freakout?
I don't use HWinfo usually. CPU-Z works fine and it's good enough for me. But yeah, I suppose some timers break that are used by some utilities.
TAGG - Pentium 4 2.8Ghz (Northwood, 133 FSB) @ 5040MHz - 41sec 410ms PiFast
in Result Discussions
Posted
Photoshop mastery ?