Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


FireKillerGR last won the day on September 1 2020

FireKillerGR had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

382 Excellent

About FireKillerGR

  • Rank
    robot overlord
  • Birthday 01/16/1995


  • Location


  • Occupation
    Something esports


  • realname

Recent Profile Visitors

11872 profile views
  1. Also interesting to point out that GPUPi for CPU gets 180 Globals out of 462 subs (2x cores), 151 out of 154 (1x core) and 200 out of 908 subs (4x cores). Same way for x265 4k, 144.3 for 116 subs (1x core), 172.3 points for 348 subs (2x cores) and 193.8 points for 743 subs (4x cores). Meanwhile for 3d, 161.6 points for 3DFSX Single out of 1963 subs (lower than the 4 times less popular gpupi dual core and two times vs quad). Same goes for dual gpu 3dfsx, 3dtsx single etc. Most remarkable of all would be 3d11 with 161.6 points with 3678 subs. --------------------------------
  2. I know its a bit hard, but maybe having a base formula/sheet that calculates what can be gained per benchmark/category & then adjusting it (before introducing changes) to see if it balances things out would be a cool idea. I doubt anybody thought/calculated/expected the current system to be that broken. At least that way, you will know where each category stands and can keep adjusting stuff till you find a formula that makes more sense. PS. obviously not meant to disrespect the amount of work and time put by Leeg and others into adjusting and making hwbot better.
  3. To be a bit more precise on the issue, I collected all the points one could get (a month ago so it might be a bit different now) from 2D and 3D and its as follows. 2D -> 8532.1 3D -> 4081.5 (of course I am aware of the 30x subs GFP cap) Only calculated the scores that get you above 80 Global Points + included per core category for each benchmark + multi-gpu configs for the 3D ones. From 2D, the benchmarks that award the most points are GPUPi and 4K. (2023.8 and 2147.6). From 3D its 03 (774.5) and 3D11 (595.5). Last but not least, there are 67 individual scores (core
  4. Necessary no; time efficient? yes. All 4 scores were done in 2 hours. Would have taken longer if we had to defrost + swap mobo/cpu. :) @AKM thanks buddy!
  5. totally agree; feels like cinebench at this point. Only difference is that it requires a couple GPUs lol
  • Create New...