Oskaliber

No. It's not so important and it's a problem if you are benching on low resolution monitor.

Yeah, but avarge position in the champions league is not better (or is at least comparable) than winning country championship + few other local cups, as it is actually with avarge Q6600/E8500 scores vs WRs made on all s478/A/370/<put any socket older than 775 in here> CPUs.

I really like the idea of increasing amount of points in popular hardware, it was good move, but in my opinion decreasing amount of points in non-popular hardware is sensless. Bring back point system for low-end from rev.2 (2pts for 1st etc.) and keep the rest of update as it is and it gonna be really nice.

It's still easy to get points now, but it's totally without the spirit of overclocking. Get any Q6600 and E8500 under SS/Dice and you can make 50 points each with very avarge scores. While someone benching every single socket 478/A processor and spending days at getting better results in benchmarks gets some just sensless decimals of points. And in the meantime you are making low budget contest, don't be hipocrisy.

Btw, what about achievements in signature? It was always nice addition. I don't really like new achievements system too. It looks like in quakelive now. A lot of sensless stuff.

1. The site is to wide, so i need to roll it left-right which is quite annoying. 2. Many things cover overclockers league a bit or other items in right sidebar. For example: hwbot january oc challage picture, table in 'benchmarks' and so on. 3. Team names in 'members rankings' are cut, etc.

I'm asking again since noone answered me. Will be the site optimized for low resolutions like 1024x768?

You are trying to make older categories more popular by making HWBOT OC Challange and at the same time you discourage to bench older stuff by lowering amout of points a lot. Now it's better to make one avarge Q6600 score than to pwn s370 categories with all available CPUs. Making 75 as max is very good idea, it now makes sens to bench popular stuff without LN2, but I don't really like idea of lowering points in older categories so much, older should be left as it was in rev.2. And if not this, then as someone said "instead of it just being 0.1 points after a certain rank it should go 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 etc." at least.

Could you optimize website for lower resolutions like 1024x768? 100~ points down by the way

Socket A contest is awesome idea, cost of whole platform would be about 40$, so it shouldn't be problem if anyone really want to participate, think about it for real P.S s478 ftw anyway

Very usuful tool, thanks

I spent last 2 days trying Discovery, TaiPan and MantaRaysXT. I didn't test them penetratingly, but mantaraysxt seems to be very nice one. Anyway I'm getting many strange problems with this platform. For example I can't push memory to 220mhz when at socket478 platform they were doing 240+.

I decided to try some other bioses. Testing MantaRayXT at the moment, it's much better that the one I had before. I tried clockgen, and it autodetected PLL as you said, but when I click apply settings nothing happens and clocks are still default, do you have any idea why? EDIT: I just tried CPUFSB which is working quite fine.

I was looking mainly for tictac's bioses, but heard something about Merlin's, so maybe I will give a try to some of these. Thanks for link.

This one is the most popular and almost every page about this bios is linking to this one: http://home.comcast.net/~shrmytoon/NF7D_10b4.ace I got little help at xs forums, and some guy gave me this link: http://members.lycos.co.uk/hallampg/BIOS/ There is tictac's d10, but it's "mantarays" and I'm not sure what is it and if it will work at NF7 rev2.0. EDIT: Also someone at xs uploaded this for me: http://www.benchbrothers.de/bilder/diverses/NF7D_10b4.ace http://www.benchbrothers.de/bilder/diverses/NF7D_10b4x2.rar but he says "They should be for NF7-S with nForce Ultra-400." so I'm still not sure if it will work.