-
Posts
155 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Marquzz
-
-
I think we've already talk about this:
HWBOT Team Cup 2016 - SC1: Current Gen
Stage 2: 3DMark11 Full Out
Limitations
â–»a Nvidia GeForce 600 series , Nvidia GeForce 700 series videocard
only ONE videocard?
many 2x bench results....
I think it's already been mentioned that there's no limitations in this stage, so as many as you want. As the above poster says, is a full out stage.
-
What a mess of a situation
Has everyone heard of "The XS phase jinx?"
Yes, I remember that one.
-
SC4 is ddr1 stage.... please do not raise idea to use ddr2 on this^^
I don't know who you answered, but my post above is regarding SC3 stage 3
-
a Mobile Celeron (Northwood), Mobile Pentium 4 (Northwood), Mobile Celeron (Merom), Mobile Pentium 4 (Prescott), Mobile Pentium (Merom), Mobile Pentium (Yonah) processor
The stage is limited to these cpus, because of the mass of possible candidates it was cut down to these to make things clear for benchers
Hm, does any of these even support DDR2?
Edit: I guess Merom and Yonah does, but the rest?
-
People
We have enough time to fix any kind of problem or "problematic situation" here.
Either it's from our side as users-contestants or from hwbot's side.
No need to be too aggresive and no need to put extra pressure on people , that have prooven to be honest , fair and hard workers , here at hwbot.
Remember to put the fun factor as number 1 priority.
Yes, of course we all do this because it's fun. What's not fun is that maybe you've access to a particular hardware for a couple of days in the beginning of the competition and bench the hell out of it. Then, after you returned it, or it has died, the rules change and your submission is invalid all of a sudden. That could make even the happiest chump a little bitter...
-
Anyone wonder why I pushed so hard in the beginning to make rules clear before competition. We can't have things like "everyone should know", "I wrote one somewhere" or "that time we did this". How hard can it be? As I said, every. single. time.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
-
On this, it is same as with AMD, you bench what is available, current gen stage is the only one where we can not keep up the pattern to stay with memory type because of technical issues, AMD has no ddr4 system until now and the mobile haswell platform as well as Haswell desktop is ddr3 - sure you can use ddr3 for haswell mobile as well
Ok, great to get that clearified. But then I have a follow up question, is it allowed to use another memory type if possible, even though the "correct" one is available? Example: SC3 Stage 1, can we use DDR3 motherboards for this one? This is just one example, there are more stages where this is possible.
-
Just one last clarification, is it mandatory to run the correct memory type under each SC? Or is it allowed to run a mobile Haswell with DDR3 under SC1 stage 3, since, I as far as I know, there are no mobile Haswell with DDR4 support?
-
The cup did not even start now and you panic?
I am quite amused tbh, all changes are already tasked internally for hours now, and stage rules are clear for example on the mobile sandy/ivy. @Taloken SC2-4 are completely linked to ddr generation. If you are willing to develop an amd board with ddr4 in one day, we can delete Haswell from SC1 and use only ddr4 at current gen
No panic from my side But since I've been in a few competitions and in practically every one there are discussions about HW limitations and rules even after start, so my thought is to make everyting clear from the start so nothing is up for interpretation.
-
I am not sure now you can read - on post #3 I explicitly stated that stage 3 of sc2 is mobile sandy/ ivy bridge... http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=451694&postcount=3
On the steamroller, amd has no ddr4 system so we took newest gen they had atm and used this, we also included haswell btw for this which is also ddr3. We thought it is better than skip amd completely from new gen and also included haswell bc we are not sure everyone has upgraded to skylake all over the world already^^
Please edit rules everywhere. Stuff can't be placed in some reply in some thread somewhere. I hope you can understand that putting Steamroller under DDR4-category is confusing? Is there another exception in any other SC, or is this the only one? Please make things like this clear, it will make your own work much easier.
-
http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=158808
post #3 should answer your question, and if you go to the stage directly via eoc sports, you find the correct cpus needed for the stage
qdigg I already anwered this above, we need a database fix we now wait for above 2 weeks to correct this...
Yes, I can read, but it still doesn't make any sense? Mobile Skylake with DDR3? Does this even exists? But I guess Haswell it is then To bad Sandy and Ivy aren't allowed, that would make much more sense in the category.
And another thing, under SC1 - Stage 4: Geekbench3 Multi Core - Steamroller. How are we suppose to run this? Can anyone show me a motherboard for Steamroller with DDR4 please.
-
Family link might come later, for sc2 stage3 refer to the announcement, already answered this and stage description is correct on this if you check it
P.S. check hwbot database cpu for bulldozer and piledriver, these are 15h gen1 and gen2 - please keep in mind that server cpus are not allowed for team cup
I'm sorry, but where do I find the official announcement? How can the description be correct, are there even any laptops with mobile Skylake and DDR3? And Stage 1 have Sandy and Ivy, it just seems logical that Stage 3 should have it also? I'm just feeling very confused, maybe this announcement will clearify thing, if I only could find it
-
Under SC2 - Stage 3; Should it really be Mobile Haswell/Skylake? Seems like Sandy/Ivy/Haswell is more relevant?
-
@websmile; Could you link 243,351 family from SC2 Stage 4?
-
I like more the "NotPay2Win" Competitions. :nana:
Yes, you should e-mail your hardware list to the moderators so that they can create competions based on that...
-
Yeah, I've got vacation in July, not going to be home
I suggest you move it to September 1st or something
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
-
Please add Galaxy S7 so that I can post results. Exynos 8890 is an ARM cpu which is RISC based:
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a8890&c=samsung_exynos_8_octa_8890
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced_instruction_set_computing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exynos
Another thing, it says this ends june 30, but only has hours left on the timer, is this another HWBot timing fail, or does the comp truly ends today?
-
Yes, I really have no problem, just wish I could get my G92 to work
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
-
But I run Win98 from a sata SSD, no probs
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
-
I've tried G80 and 256MB G92, no luck, tried modded drivers which include 88xx in the inf. Tried some modding myself as well, no luck. I haven't found anyone running any 8xxx card in 98.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
-
Background says R4, should probably change that.
-
It says "use one videocard core in total" - this means no dual gpu cards like on all challenger divisions
Oh, how blind am I....thanks
-
-
It says "a Nvidia GeForce 7 series videocard", does this means one (1)? If this is the case, does the GX2-cards count as one or two?
Frequency detection bug with old Socket 5 CPUs
in HWBOT News
Posted
My score was reported, but I didn't even overclock my P100, it was just to get a sub in a competiion, it's actually clocked at 1.5x66 per default and this is what CPU-Z shows.
But if you like to remove the sub, it's fine, I don't bench anymore and it's not like this score is top anyway lol
http://hwbot.org/submission/2983806_marquzz_cpu_frequency_pentium_100mhz_99_mhz