Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

ScunnyUK

Members
  • Posts

    91
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ScunnyUK

  1. Id like to know this too but not just Samsung version, is any ram cache / ram drive allowed as I thought using them is illegal? Also I think I know the answer but conformation would be good on whever or not Skylake systems can be used in any stage?
  2. Hi Massman, its good to be around yep no matter how hard I try I just cant shake the habbit.. I mean hobbie
  3. Thanx bud, could probably squeeze a bit more out of this rig aswell I reckon
  4. Trying Out My New Rig, Windows 10 Tech Preview Evaluation Copy O.S. Intel i7 5820k @ 4Ghz Asrock x99M Killer Corsair Vengeance LPX 16gig ddr4 @ 2666Mhz 15-17-17-35 1T Galax GTX970 EXOC Black Edition @ stock Crucial MX100 256gig SSD + Seagate 2TB HDD Fractel Design Node 804 MATX Case
  5. Thankyou for your kind words and this information, I did not realize the result.txt file is now mandatory and posted 2 screenshots, 1 showing top half and the other showing bottom half of the result details window so all subtest scores are displayed. If this is deemed unacceptable then I will remove the score as I cannot rebench the cpu now, at least not at these clocks anyway. Thanks ontheair:)
  6. I said Nice One Bruvaaa! HeHee cheers Kenny I'll be giving this chip one last bash tonight and hopefully streaming live again>> http://www.justin.tv/scunnyuk
  7. This is an older result, I havnt uploaded any results from the other day yet. I havnt quite finished re-benching the chip and will upload any / all better results when I have The best cpu freq I managed on Saturday with the Giga ep45 was 4857Mhz
  8. Very nice improvement mate weird though there is quite a drop in the SSD's performance (xp start up particularly), any ideas why?
  9. very nice setup mate what harddrive is it, single ssd? good xp start up time if it is also have you tried any of the tweaks here>> http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=37447 to maximze your score.
  10. lol some have different sm2 , hdr, cpu scores in the result window to what is in the result details window
  11. That would be great Massman if its not too much hassel Just how many by region will be fine Thanks
  12. Hi, can you tell me or is there a way to see how many overclockers are members here at HWbot and categorize by region and country ( i.e. how many from America, how many from Europe, how many Asia, ect and then by country aswell) Thanx
  13. Im putting off ordering LN2 for the time being until this is figured out. You can get a legitimate non bugged screenshot / validation file if you open cpu-z last after overclocking on the fly, only problem is it will still come under scrutiny because no results can really be trusted at the moment.
  14. Hi guys, Yes Im using the latest CPU-Z 1.61 zipped package, the one that is supposed to be fixed. I carried on testing last night and the results were repeatable although sometimes the clock speeds would go down aswell as up I never tried with any other software than Turbo V Evo though.
  15. OK ver:1.61 has just bugged out on me and it is letting me submit the bugged result for validation. I just started playing by trying to raise FSB by 5 using Turbo V Evo. I already had 1 instance of CPU-Z open. Trying to apply the extra FSB didnt work and no changes appeared in cpu-z or turbo V evo, I tried a second time with just 3 extra FSB and again it did not apply or make any changes. So next I tried to up the cpu multi by x1 which upon clicking apply worked and raised the multiplyer from x8 to x9, but in cpu-z the FSB, HT, NB and ram speeds also all increased along with the cpu's clock speed by an extra 37 FSB, thus giving me false results. I opened another instance of cpu-z which read all speeds / Mhz correctly but then I tried to submit from the bugged instance and was able to get a valid result. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429861 Screenys show bugged cpu-z at top with correct at bottom.
  16. I had alot of bugs with ver:1.60.1 which have been fixed in the new ver:1.61, although it still has an issue with the SPD data as can be seen in this screen shot (old ver1.60.1 on the left, new ver:1.61 on the right) Online validation appears to be working fine for me aswell now http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429692 Edit, Just noticed the validation page has wrong ram settings / timings.
  17. e2140 results showing correct for me now and no more errors I guess a caching problem is right, Thanx:)
×
×
  • Create New...