-
Posts
91 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by ScunnyUK
-
ScunnyUK - Core i7 5820K @ 4600MHz - 7413 marks PCMark7
ScunnyUK replied to HiVizMan's topic in Result Discussions
Hi Massman, its good to be around yep no matter how hard I try I just cant shake the habbit.. I mean hobbie -
ScunnyUK - Core i3 530 @ 5039MHz - 8sec 533ms SuperPi - 1M
ScunnyUK replied to HiVizMan's topic in Result Discussions
ahh early days yet Dag, cheers mate -
ScunnyUK - Core i7 5820K @ 4600MHz - 7413 marks PCMark7
ScunnyUK replied to HiVizMan's topic in Result Discussions
Thanx bud, could probably squeeze a bit more out of this rig aswell I reckon -
Trying Out My New Rig, Windows 10 Tech Preview Evaluation Copy O.S. Intel i7 5820k @ 4Ghz Asrock x99M Killer Corsair Vengeance LPX 16gig ddr4 @ 2666Mhz 15-17-17-35 1T Galax GTX970 EXOC Black Edition @ stock Crucial MX100 256gig SSD + Seagate 2TB HDD Fractel Design Node 804 MATX Case
-
ScunnyUK - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 4725MHz - 30504 marks PCMark 2005
ScunnyUK replied to Farjam's topic in Result Discussions
Cheers Genieben, I hope so -
ScunnyUK - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 4725MHz - 30504 marks PCMark 2005
ScunnyUK replied to Farjam's topic in Result Discussions
Thankyou for your kind words and this information, I did not realize the result.txt file is now mandatory and posted 2 screenshots, 1 showing top half and the other showing bottom half of the result details window so all subtest scores are displayed. If this is deemed unacceptable then I will remove the score as I cannot rebench the cpu now, at least not at these clocks anyway. Thanks ontheair:) -
blindfitter - 2x Radeon HD 3870 @ 999/1299MHz - 29518 marks 3DMark06
ScunnyUK replied to topdog's topic in Result Discussions
Nice work Dave -
Hey fancy sharing those blurry secrets???
-
topdog - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz) @ 4812MHz - 66430 marks PCMark 2005
ScunnyUK replied to GENiEBEN's topic in Result Discussions
Great work TD -
lol some have different sm2 , hdr, cpu scores in the result window to what is in the result details window
-
How many members?
ScunnyUK replied to ScunnyUK's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
That would be great Massman if its not too much hassel Just how many by region will be fine Thanks -
Hi, can you tell me or is there a way to see how many overclockers are members here at HWbot and categorize by region and country ( i.e. how many from America, how many from Europe, how many Asia, ect and then by country aswell) Thanx
-
CPU-Z 1.61 is out! Bugs, feedbacks go in here
ScunnyUK replied to Christian Ney's topic in Benchmark software
Im putting off ordering LN2 for the time being until this is figured out. You can get a legitimate non bugged screenshot / validation file if you open cpu-z last after overclocking on the fly, only problem is it will still come under scrutiny because no results can really be trusted at the moment. -
CPU-Z 1.61 is out! Bugs, feedbacks go in here
ScunnyUK replied to Christian Ney's topic in Benchmark software
Hi guys, Yes Im using the latest CPU-Z 1.61 zipped package, the one that is supposed to be fixed. I carried on testing last night and the results were repeatable although sometimes the clock speeds would go down aswell as up I never tried with any other software than Turbo V Evo though. -
CPU-Z 1.61 is out! Bugs, feedbacks go in here
ScunnyUK replied to Christian Ney's topic in Benchmark software
OK ver:1.61 has just bugged out on me and it is letting me submit the bugged result for validation. I just started playing by trying to raise FSB by 5 using Turbo V Evo. I already had 1 instance of CPU-Z open. Trying to apply the extra FSB didnt work and no changes appeared in cpu-z or turbo V evo, I tried a second time with just 3 extra FSB and again it did not apply or make any changes. So next I tried to up the cpu multi by x1 which upon clicking apply worked and raised the multiplyer from x8 to x9, but in cpu-z the FSB, HT, NB and ram speeds also all increased along with the cpu's clock speed by an extra 37 FSB, thus giving me false results. I opened another instance of cpu-z which read all speeds / Mhz correctly but then I tried to submit from the bugged instance and was able to get a valid result. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429861 Screenys show bugged cpu-z at top with correct at bottom. -
CPU-Z 1.61 is out! Bugs, feedbacks go in here
ScunnyUK replied to Christian Ney's topic in Benchmark software
I had alot of bugs with ver:1.60.1 which have been fixed in the new ver:1.61, although it still has an issue with the SPD data as can be seen in this screen shot (old ver1.60.1 on the left, new ver:1.61 on the right) Online validation appears to be working fine for me aswell now http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429692 Edit, Just noticed the validation page has wrong ram settings / timings. -
Results In Wrong Category
ScunnyUK replied to ScunnyUK's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
e2140 results showing correct for me now and no more errors I guess a caching problem is right, Thanx:)