PowerToTheUsers

You din't even need photoshop to cheat that away :roll:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631560 But it's still wrong: it's the same result as http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591247, which is matched correctly.

Bump...

bump...

The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported."). If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz. If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz. If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz. So please move * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091 to the right category... And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...) The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU.

I have a Gigabyte iRAM, but I have a problem with it. If I have windows running on another disk, I can use the ramdisk without problems. But if I install windows on the iRAM, it doesn't work: there's a notice "no operating system found", and it seems like there's no partition on it... Any ideas?

bump

The results in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812'>http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 should be in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_807. The category of http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 is the same as http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1276. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_814 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1278 and http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_815 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1279. Thx The other Xeons need some cleaning too: I noticed a lot of Xeon 3060 (core 2 duo xeons, 2.4GHz default) in the Xeon 2.4GHz category, perhaps others too, but I didn't check them all yet.

It's still strange... Xeon quadcores are only available at socket 771 now, and s771 is only made in dual-cpu setups. If you check his screenshot (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=24322&thumb=false), you can see it reports as being socket P (478), which is a mobile platform (santa rosa). Furthermore: CPU-z shows stepping 9, revision E0, as "normal" Xeon quadcores report as stepping 7, revision B3. I really would like to see more information on this setup: is it really a quad-cpu setup? Or is it a new revision that scores so high, even in dual-cpu? With the current stepping and 2.4GHz (9x266) in a 2 cpu x quad core setup, those scores are impossible.

About http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611672 In the CPU-z screen, you can clearly see it's a Xeon X5365, running default at 3.0GHz (hardwareId=CPU_1407). I reported this as "badly matched" as it is ranked amongst Xeon 5345-CPU's (only 2.33GHz stock, hardwareId=CPU_1267). I totally agree with the result, it's an acceptable score, so no doubt about the result itself, but it IS badly matched. So please moderators, move the result to the right category