Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ivan1981

  1. @Sweet: Maybe problem with bot, I can't see the score posted on forum in thread picked by bot. http://www.pcaxe.com/forum/showthread.php?t=259 But I see that this score 14745 is linked with his older score with 14746 points which is strange. An on http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=17997&applicationId=5 I cannot see that he have 14745 core, but 14746 that is fixed before. @HWbot stuff: If I delete his scores from our forum does the scanned score from bot stays on HWbot, or the score dissapear? Maybe this can solve problem with his scores and wrong bot picking score, if score picked by bot can be deleted from forum and stay in HWbot database. Or can you tell me what he should write in description field to recognize card like 8600GT 256 DDR3?
  2. Yes, it should be fixed. Before few day ago I fixed one of his score. Problem is with the bot because in the forum he writes 8600GT (default 8600GT was with ddr3) and bot picks up 8600GT ddr2 instead of 8600GT ddr3.I will tell him to put extra ddr3 text in description on forum post in order to bot recognize the card properly.
  3. It came to my attention that now exist the new Radeon 2600 PRO ddr3 category. I edited my all scores(I hope ) achieved with Radeon 2600PRO with ddr3 memory and now these scores are in right category(in the time of the submition category of 2600pro ddr3 didn't exist). My 2 scores are validated and checked by moderator(not the best score with HW) and I can't change the category for them. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735331 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688501 It can be problem because I will have results with the same card in two category, and yes I will have more HW points for that, but this is not right and not according to rules, and it will be nice if moderator can edit category(change to radeon HD 2600pro gddr3 category) of this 2 scores.
  4. Is there any news about this? Any progress with bot code that fully support new IPB forums?
  5. Here is my AQ3 blocked score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707401 This thread is going to be the big/huge one
  6. You rebels, good soldiers of the empire will crush you p.s.In secrecy AUS made a second Death Star.Beat that
  7. I voted no, for one reason. 3Dmark Vantage!=other 3Dmark This is not because of the price(7 usd is affordable), this is because 3D mark was utility with only ONE default benchmark and ONE final/total score.That is essence of all 3D mark until now.3D mark Vantage is not like the previous, it is something like baby 3D mark.They at futuremark doesn't have guts to choose one preset as default one(information from the first post), and this looks something like they is not sure about "legality" of the scores achieved by 3D mark Vantage, and that is why they choose presets. This is my opinion of it, and maybe I'm not right about my last statements, but it looks like that to me. Maybe timming of this question is not right, because 3D mark Vantage is not out yet.If 3D mark Vantage is widely accepted(not like PC mark Vantage) and if scores achieved by it is valid than you can choose to add all presets to make HWbot points.
  8. Wrong videocard(verfication link says 7800GT): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679684
  9. No resolution.Results are too high for this clocks of the card: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700531 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700532 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700536 Possible smaller resolution then default.
  10. Aussie revenge (The empire strikes back ) 10.Australia 4537.4 11.Belgium 4536.5 Just 0.9 points
  11. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660726 Verification link is dead, no picture. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682889 Wrong category, not radeon 9500 but radeon 3870.
  12. I saw this, but I have Palit 2600pro(with ddr3 memory) card and in GPU-Z i have also unknown subvendor.I hope that new GPU-Z will recognize it.I don't know is sapphire have subvendor(but I'm sure that have), because I could change it for sapphire card because fan on the palit is became annoying. Also as I know 2600xt have higher clock then 2600pro with ddr3 memory(600(palit) or 700(sapphire) ->800 MHz for gpu and 1400(700)->1600MHz(800) for memory), and if you see much greater clock thean default you can be suspicious, but as I know volmod on palit and sapphire could be done by pencil and higher clock could be easily achieved, and this method is not precise. And, yes putting 2600pro bios on 2600xt card and publish that score as score of 2600pro is cheating.
  13. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656289 - no resolution Also look for my previous post
  14. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675099 - again picture without any information.As I can see on any picture he submit he didn't show memory/gpu clock of the card. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676464 - and score too high(and look the scores with 7300gt ddr3 in aquamark with much higher clocks and better cpu and they have similar score). See for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625681 (which is ok score) - he has a way better cpu and 10MHz more for core, and 60 MHz less for memory, and a score more than 10% less then johncsj's score.
  15. FM is futuremark online result browser.When you submit some result online you will see link to register and when you register every other result you submit will show on your FM account.Only problem is that if you don't have paid version(pro, advanced) you may only publish one score(read as: get validation link) per 3dmark/pcmark, except for 2001 where you can publish more than one score. But if you have only one graphic card you will publish only the highest score and non paid version of 3dmark will be enough for that.For other situation you have to open another FM account(maybe this is forbidden, but I don't see any mention on futuremark that this is forbidden), or pay for 3dmark and publish as many scores as you want to publish.
  16. These scores from johncjs does't have any information on gpu and cpu. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676466 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676468 - and this score is too high(SLI maybe?) And this score has invalid futuremark link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635889
  • Create New...