Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

heislera763

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About heislera763

  • Birthday April 2

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

heislera763's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Week One Done Rare
  • One Month Later Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. It took me forever to get 4.6 GHz stable enough to complete R15 runs. It ended up being a combination of letting my room cool down and dropping CPU PLL by around 50mV from stock that got 4.6 to start completing benchmarks (cinebench rng played its role as well). I might revisit this to see if 4.625 or so is doable, maybe on a cold day or something.
  2. Note: Benchmate seems to misreport the CPU ID when cores are disabled
  3. I've noticed that the various lists on HWBot cannot be sorted by column, but I think it would be very helpful in some circumstances to be able to sort by column. For example, on a page like this: https://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=lga2011 I would like to be able to sort the list by popularity, but it doesn't seem possible currently. I'm not sure if this is easy to implement but I think it would be a nice addition.
  4. https://hwbot.org/submission/5107544_ https://hwbot.org/submission/5107577_ https://hwbot.org/submission/5107584_ https://hwbot.org/submission/5118420_ These 4 are missing CPU-Z in the screenshot so they should be deleted. https://hwbot.org/submission/5135739_ This last one I'm not sure about, but when i submitted through Benchmate it detected the CPU wrong (probably because I unlocked it to 4 cores?). After editing the score it seems to have retained an inflated hardware point score and I also don't like how it overwrites my 2 core score.
×
×
  • Create New...