harleybro

I haven't run a game on any rig in the past 2 years I also haven't had a network connection on any bench rig in the past 2 years. I voted to add of coarse. Now that I see I won't be able to submit scores since I can't save them it's useless. I was planning on a second GX2 just to run along with purchase Vista (just to bench) but I will not be adding a network in to run a bench. I use a laptop with a 3g card which is fine for all my network needs except running a bench aparently. :-( It's funny I have always supported Fm and bought pro versions of all bench programs but for $500 to submit they lose all respect IMHO.

Just figure I would throw in my two cents. I am sure I have tons of cpu-z screens oc'd that don't show voltage. It used to always happen when pushing the voltage too far. I think I saw it most in FX-57 days.

I would say definately no to mipmap. The CH is actually very low for 810 core. Nature is about on par. Here's a run with cpu at 5200 and I forget 785-790core. Only tweaking was LOD and OS no mipmap used at all. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9354506

I would definately agree. If one person did buy that many I would definately guess they are a reseller and I am not sure MC is licensed to be a distributer for resellers. Hmmm interesting side note I just checked their site and product is no longer available.

I have never seen an 8500 available in the US. I know me and others have been looking for them. On a side note it is interesting the local MicroCenter had approximately 20 8400's last Wednesday. I went in to buy one Friday and was told a customer came in and bought 19 of them the day before.

Looks like the HOT guys just had some major runs and took a big leap forward. I think it's time for OCX to get to the grind and keep on pushing it! Great battle everyone this has been a blast so far.

As I stated in the comments it should be considered single. The performance of this card and 3870's in crossfire is differant. If they where identical clock for clock then maybe it should be considered crossfire. Changing the rules this late in the game would be a slap in the face to anyone purchasing one of these due to the results they where getting.

I think both of these users results should be looked into for AM3. Unusual for two members of same team to have results for a 7200GS 64mb, 128, and a 256 and all only in AM3. Also both have at least one extremely skewed result. One over 58k and another over 62k on a 64mb card? http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10009 http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191

I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191

Ok how come this result can't be blocked? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574722 There is no data at all to say what cpu it is? I have had my T5500 result for Pi removed from my page which had been submitted becaue there was no cpu-z to go along with it.

One of our members: Can you guys change it? It should be 03 and not 05. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651802

Are links to FM still needed for top 20 results? I know there was discussion about ss but thought you still needed an fm link for top 20 global: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648325 Obviously the wrong res on this one: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648329 This one might be legit but no cpu/gpu info and no clock rates on either just a ss. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648178

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626714 the screen shows 9.593 not 9 seconds.

I hate to even post this but I am sure he has the right link. I was playing with the 06 calc and checking scores. The verification link here is for 18,4xx not 19k. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=588607

You might want to check another score also. Both similar CPU clocks: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=615741 GPU clocks extremely low for nearly the same score http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=628924 Wrong res. on this one: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=639295