Noxinite
-
Posts
1543 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Noxinite
-
-
Show me moaaaaar! :D
-
I mean OS is the same as any other mobo for Haswell?
-
1
-
-
I assume the frequency limits apply to both core/cache? Probably a good idea to state that if so.
Edit: is "unique processors" different from "unique processor cores"? Or does "unique processor cores" mean unique number of processor cores, in which case disabling cores might be a good idea to put in the rules.
-
I didn't think IGPUs could run GPUPI?
-
I bought one ages ago, never tested, haha. Nice work Tagg!
-
-
!voteban Leeghoofd
-
1
-
1
-
-
That won't work for 3D though.
But CC is normally more modern that TC, so I guess BM will work for some of the stages.
-
Tbh, over the course of this thread and a bit of thinking I've changed my mind, I honestly think we should just keep going as we already are - so 16C. *Shrugs*
-
7
-
3
-
-
Bringing out the modded board again, I like it!
-
1
-
-
No idea. Hard to compare as it seems like you need different settings for air/cold.
-
-
I kinda like how 1x, 3x and 5x are "legacy" global so to speak, but that's a bit off topic...
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, der8auer said:
I guess eventually it might make more sense to split globals in few categories such as Mobile, Desktop, High End Desktop and Server similar to what Rauf already suggested. I'm very open to such solutions but as I already pointed out we will need quite a lot of time to make this happen.
Regarding AMD FX I have no problem changing this to 4 Cores if this makes the community happy. Probably won't change anything tho?
There was a lawsuit that decided that there is no official definition for a core, so AMD could market it as 8 cores even if it shares resources in pairs. IMO just list it as AMD marketed it.
-
1
-
-
It still feels like option #4 is the best put forward. Having mixed would be strange is you got 2P+8E & 6P+4E in the same global ranking.
-
1
-
-
PMed about #1-4.
-
I feel we should be thinking less about point distribution being "unfair" or "unbalanced", as that is still an ongoing process with HWBot since the change in ownership. Aiming for simplicity and fitting into the database in a way that makes sense seems more important right now IMO.
-
I like the idea of having the small cores enabled/disabled for different rankings (no. 4). It could be implemented similar to the "unlocked shaders" tick box on submissions for graphics cards - but obviously you would have it enabled by default so the newer members wouldn't flood the database with incorrect submissions.
-
10 hours ago, shar00750 said:
Excellent work bro? no other bench?
10 hours ago, TaPaKaH said:pi golds when?
4 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:Sweet silver. Waiting 32m from you!
Was only aiming for FSB this time, getting 1T or even 2:3 working is a lot of effort especially for 32M (don't forget all the tedious register editing either for effi). Maybe next time, but no guarantees.
-
2
-
-
Tried again on LN2, but very little progress before CPU go poof - only 738. https://hwbot.org/submission/4797732 2nd chip tried stopped around 733 after a few hours of trying, so thinking maybe near board limit? Especially as without CPU-z open I only saw 740 maximum.
-
-
'Cause I'm just a sucka for cold PSC here's some more.
One stick from the last 1600C7 set and the other from a new 1600C7 kit I got. Better for C6 freq, but worse on RCD so couldn't try 2750 6-9-6 like I wanted. So instead I was at much higher freq with RCD10 (that kills effi even with 3/4 IOLs), also check out that high RAS.
Therefore still no bunnyextraction 16s. D;
-
2
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, TaPaKaH said:
Do Xeons have x6.5 multi actually working?
CPU-Z bug as Ground said, I saw x5 at one point.
Side note, Giga doesn't let you even select x6.5 in BIOS, while Asus does (but sets x6 instead).
-
Country Cup 2021 Planning Thread
in HWBOT Competitions
Posted
GPU stage 6 bans Titan GPUs, but is also AMD only?