Spiedie

tl:dr https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45025086/hwbot/HWBotPrimeFor9.zip, extract and double click run.cmd get activation.jar out of JAF 1.1 from Java Archive Downloads - Java Platform Technologies get jaxb .jars from lib folder, downloaded from https://jaxb.java.net/2.2.11/ place jars in same folder (need hwbotprime-0.8.3.jar, activation.jar, jabx-api.jar, jaxb-core.jar, jaxb-impl.jar) create file run.cmd or run.bat with contents: start javaw -cp .\* org.hwbot.bench.BootStrap double click run if you still can't save datafiles, replace javaw with java to see the errors

Well, it can work.. theres some libaries missing/inaccessible in the newer java 9 builds. You need JAXB and JAF to be able to save datafiles. For java 9 compatibility hwbot prime needs an update unless you want to use external libraries and run from command line. @Massman is it allowed to use these external libraries to bench or are we gona have to wait for an update of hwbot prime?

I done my 10b run on sandy G470 single core with 4GB ram. works fine, just costs a couple HDDs... Is swap mode going to be allowed in the future?

This is what you get if you throw every java you can get at every system you can get your hands on. 5 runs per java version, 80+ different java versions. Ill let everyone else test skylake Min 3583.77, max 3591.22, diff 7.45, ratio 0.21%, best jre8u31 i5-2400S Min 3602.00, max 3608.58, diff 6.58, ratio 0.18%, best jre7u51 i7-2630QM Min 7458.67, max 7499.40, diff 40.73, ratio 0.55%, best jre7u15 2xE5-2670 Min 4589.02, max 5390.52, diff 801.50, ratio 17.47%, best jre9u83 i5-3570k 4Ghz Min 4919.96, max 4958.63, diff 38.67, ratio 0.79%, best jre7u76 i7-4712MQ Min 1555.62, max 1592.32, diff 36.70, ratio 2.36%, best jre6u3 D925 Min 3989.60, max 4384.42, diff 394.82, ratio 9.90%, best jre6u20 G3258 4.7Ghz Min 1639.32, max 1643.54, diff 4.22, ratio 0.26%, best jre8u51 G470 Min 1666.20, max 1698.01, diff 31.81, ratio 1.91%, best jre7u71 Atom Z3740D

Just tried on Z97 W7 with HPET enabled and disabled: that seems to be the issue. With HPET enabled and Process Lasso enabled, p95-bench.exe runs at normal priority. After disabling HPET and rebooting, Lasso does its thing and it runs at Realtime priority (causing the issues). If skylake is unaffected then is looks to be the same old RTC bug (or Intels attempt at fixing the issue with RTC in XTU, fixes breaking things never happened before right?).

You finally did the math i see All my other slow runs have followed a 3x fast + 2x slow pattern, to the point that runtime = 27.5xfirst batch pretty accurately (or 27.5x any 5th batch, so batch 1, 6 ,11, 16, so 36h in the 946h run = 27.5x990h, close enough). Yours should then be 39x27.5 = 1072h. My plan of a 40 day run worked out pretty accurately i think

Ok thanks, time to watch some slideshows

I know, multi day times on hwbot have been off since the start of this stage.

Just to be sure before i start a run with aquamark, windows 8.1 IS allowed for unoverclockable systems right? (Dell venue 8 pro with Atom Z3740D in this case)

Only 1 core running and the rest idle, makes working with it a lot easier

So, apparently 946h isn't 40 days but 25? Time travel! http://hwbot.org/submission/2979478

Thats why you use a 10h battery life tablet

Good luck to all, Hardware.info novices are all extreme now

18H Gold cup, ill take it!

Yes it did, forgot to save result file first time...