Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

RyderOCZ

Members
  • Posts

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About RyderOCZ

  • Birthday 11/28/1969

Converted

  • Location
    Kalamazoo / Sunnyvale

RyderOCZ's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Must be keyword issues, to the HWbot staff. That is a legit score, but it is with the E3110 Xeon CPU, which is in the description and screenshot. Also the other 2 from my team, one of them is with an A64 X2 6000+... hahahaha
  2. RyderOCZ

    What !! ????

    I think this falls under a joke. See attachment.
  3. Do you want one drive to the other, or from 1 folder to another folder on the drive?
  4. Here are a couple comparisons of SSD vs HDD performance: On the left is the Core Drive vs Seagate 7200.9 250GB on the right. This is attached to an AW9D Max (Abit) motherboard with ICH7R. These two are on an Asus P5Q3 with ICH10R. The first one (top) is the Core, second (bottom) is the Seagate. Both sets of tests were performed on the same SATA port on the respective motherboard and using the same SATA cable
  5. There already are links. 1st, you navigate here: Then you select the info for that benchmark and under that you have this: Hope that helps
  6. I can assure you it works. There are currently over 1300 reported results, you guys just have to be patient Its not like this is life or death
  7. Having someone on your team with 0 points doesn't hurt the team does it? I haven't seen a statistic that shows "avg points/member" or did I miss it?
  8. Roger that...I only have 1 4400+ and it is a Brisbane
  9. Hey... you are supposed to be on vacation....WTF you doing looking at stuff here? You young pup's...just can't leave it alone for a week, can you
  10. Exactly my point jmke .... I don't like it, I don't particularly intend to do it, but I want to know what my team is up against I think you should just say no, you can't have a "sub-team" consisting of members that have individual scores. If you have a group of guys that don't submit individual scores, that want to get together and have recognition/contribution as a group...more power to them. But for team members to just decide to get together on a weekend, then make a new user, call it a "sub-team" and have it earn over 300 points in the same categories that individually have already been granted hwboints. I don't care for it.
  11. Ok, so basically what I see and understand is this: 1) I can take my hardware (which is all giving me points and will continue to do so as I push it further) and get together with a fellow team member who also brings some of his hardware. 2) We can bench and create a new user for this "bench session" submitting all the results from it, as long as they are not any of our own scores from previous runs. 3) If these runs place that "team" in an area that earns hwboints, the sub-team and team will be credited with those points as shown in the above example. Do I have that right?
  12. Please see above. If this is going to be allowed, I need to get busy.
  13. So now this Moscow_Subteam scores should be blocked or is this legal? I can take my hardware over to another member's house, we can bench as a subteam with this hardware and add points to the team? Both members of this "sub-team" are already in the roster for the main team and are earning points for this hardware. The scores for the individuals are not the same as the scores for the sub-team, but you should not just be able to create a sub-team with existing members just to get more points... should you? Sub-team: http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10238 Individual Users on Sub-Team: http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=5961 http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=6680 They got together and basically added 350+ points to the team because they ran Single and Dual cards.
  14. Holy crap what am I reading here? This is a volunteer basis for the crew here, AFAIK, guys..... lighten up. That was very rude I take it these results are keeping you or your team from earning more points? Competition is one thing but, out for blood is something we don't need. Thanks for your hard work Massman
×
×
  • Create New...