Lippokratis

something is wrong with the selection of the best submission in the SC1 Stage 2 in the Team Cup. this submission http://hwbot.org/submission/2572540_agent_fresh_cpu_frequency_sempron_64_2600_(palermo)_2977.9_mhz (86%) is better than this http://hwbot.org/submission/2572243 (31%) but the lower score is the one which counts for the team. the 86% submission has counted until the other submission was maded. please fix this bug

i get no TPP for these submission but i'm the best from my team. http://hwbot.org/submission/2503307_lippokratis_cpu_frequency_pentium_t4300_2608.06_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/2504268_lippokratis_cpu_frequency_pentium_t4200_(2ghz)_2580.85_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/2504270_lippokratis_cpu_frequency_core_2_duo_t6500_(2.1ghz)_2581.57_mhz i have tried to upload the submissions again but no change. recalculation doesn't help neither

Ticket ID: 1868 Priority: Low please add this cpu. i have no cpu-z validation just the screens with cpu-z cpu from a member of the team\r\n\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/submission/2487781_ue50_wprime___32m_xeon_e5_2609_7sec_597ms\r\n\r\nthe score was reported because it is in the wrong category and there is noch V2 Category. so the submission can\'t be moved.\r\n\r\nit must be this cpu http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon%20E5-2609%20v2.html

i had seen it to late. the old version is much slower, so no problem when using

1. problems with the right number of sockets. if the user uploads his score hwbot sets the number of socket to 2. when i edit the score (first edit: socket number to 2 because it is 1 even when the submission says dual socket; second edit: back to single socket) than the submission is okay. but when the user triggers an recalculation of his points the submission is back to dual socket. http://hwbot.org/submission/2414562_ ; http://hwbot.org/submission/2414560_ 2. problem with achievements. with every submission i make i get the same achievement. or to be specific i get the message for the achievement i don't get the achievement, which is correct because i don't have used the manufacture for my RAM (some problems described in post 262 (http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=269350&postcount=262) http://hwbot.org/user/lippokratis/

Ticket ID: 1766 Priority: Low please ad the Pentium M 745A\r\n\r\npicture: http://abload.de/img/img_0496efj9o.jpg\r\n\r\ncpuz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2884564

thank you very much. with 0.8.3 everything is okay

something new about the solution of the problem?

Uploading of HWbot Prime scores isn't possible. With Version 0.8.2 it says that it is the wrong version of the benchmark. please solve the problem. and if it is possible solve it so that the old scores with 0.8.2 are still valid and useable for upload.

Ticket ID: 1765 Priority: Low please add the Pentium M 715 A\r\n\r\npicture: http://abload.de/img/img_0495a8aqc.jpg\r\n\r\ncpuz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2884300

same problem here

when i try to upload a hwbot prime result (Version 0.8.0) an error appears. before the hwbot.org update i had no problems with version 0.7.0.

I have a question about the final ranking. Why is the user "topdog" placed on rank 17 and my usermate "Icke&Er" only on rank 18? Both get 14pts by submitting a SuperPi 32m and a Cinebench Score, BUT "Icke&Er" submit a better in both Benchmarks! In my oppinion he must rank 17 and topdog on place 18.......or is there a mistake on my calculation?

can you re upload the picture with the CPUs?

http://hwbot.org/submission/2267646_blackbolt_3dmark06_geforce_8800_ultra_19833_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2265627_blackbolt_3dmark06_radeon_hd_3870_512mb_gddr3_15380_marks no points. recalculation fails with the error "Failed to synchronize rankings: Failed to select a row." deleting and uploading the result again doesn't help. please fix. edit: i see there is already a thread/post for this problem - so just ignore my post

i vote against it, because the software affects the benchmark and this is against the rules. when some frames are just particular calculate it is a change in the normal running of a benchmark. so for me this is cheating because you calculate less frames than the others who have pushed their hardware to the limits. just leave the software in the box and do hardware overclocking and not software cheating. no physix driver, no ati tesselation cheat, nothing where software interferes the benchmark.

i have a 6OXT and yes without any problems

Ticket ID: 1467 Priority: Low please add the cpu. the 3200 clawhammer 754 have all 1024kb l2 cache. this one has only 512kb l2 cache but a 200 mhz higher frequency.\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2231860\r\n\r\ni think my bios is to old so the multi is 4 an it shows ES. the cpu looks like a retail one with no ES on it. \r\n\r\nhttp://www.abload.de/img/img_152908u9i.jpg\r\n\r\ncpu-world don\'t list the cpu but wikipedia knows the OPN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Athlon_64_microprocessors#.22ClawHammer.22_.28C0_.26_CG.2C_130_nm.29

the the winner is who is on the 4th place in the overall ranking at the end of the competion or counts a 4th place in a stage as a stage victory and you get 10 points and at the end the best scoring team wins?

"just" 3,7V

i think something is wrong with my hardware library. i found it as well on the library's of some of my teammates

please merge the categories. non-J Celeron are only for socket478

Ticket ID: 1375 Priority: Low please add the 2.66GHz Prescott or show me the right categorie\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1985369

still testing. vGPu @ 1,6V vMEM @ stock

Ticket ID: 1302 Priority: Low please add this VIA CPU\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1882645\r\n\r\npicture:\r\nhttp://www.abload.de/img/viac3900a-1hkws.jpg