matose
-
Posts
256 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by matose
-
-
Hey, that's my hammer mod
)Congrats guys, keep it up!
-
Very High also worked best for me with Core 0 strongest. I hate that PSCheck thingy, hope ASUS will release a proper TurboV soon
-
Yes)
With correct LLC much easier make CPUz)))
Extreme or Very High? What core was the best for your CPU?
-
The difference between the first 5 teams for example is pretty small, how are these calculated?
Also, how are the points distributed to the members of the team? Split by 2?
Thanks
-
When subzero, it should go just as high as the other boards, btw. The ES did 5300+ on all tested boards here, including UD7.
I want to feel the limit of the CPU, not the limit of the board so it's still a fail for me!
BTW, UD7 had also a very bad cold-boot around 0 degrees... not touching that MB again
-
We tested UD7 / UD5 / UD3 yesterday and we had the same problems: CPU that did 5200MHz on ASUS R4E / P9X79 WS and ASRock X79 Extreme 4 barely stable at 4800MHz. Fail
! -
Yes! Also, here is also the CL9 WR (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2133007) and CL8 WR (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2133017)
-
Thanks guys! One week of pretesting and a very long day yesterday but in the end it was all worth it
CPU NB - 1.625v
VDDR - 1.95v
with CPU and RAM at full pot!
-
Use the latest BIOS for best memory OC (I recommend 0083b). On R4E there's no significant gain in memory OC by using 2T, you can use 1T without any problems
-
For 4-way you have to use Win7 which gives much worse scores than WinXP and it don't scale with frequency past a certain point
3D03 scales with 3 & 4-Way if you have a high frequency CPU
(read GT over 6200-6300MHz) -
I thought the reason for giving points is to reward a good score, not a category is has absolutely no interest for benching. To bench 4-way in Win7 for 3DMark01 is like competing in the special olympics
L.E: You're changing a little the rules of the game. You want to give normal people reason to bench and I get that, but the distribution of points does not reflect the value of score. This is just my opinion
-
FYI, the difference between "shitty overall wr" and a "single gpu wr" is over 100p: 59.8p (eg: 3x CPU wprime) versus 168p (eg: 1x GPU 3DM06).
This is one of the many problems that proves that I was right and 60 Global Point for every WR was a bad ideea: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=34300&page=2
95k 3DMark01 is a spectacular WR that deserves 60 Global Points?
Note that it has more points than no. 7 in single card ranking which is infinitely more difficult to achieve: http://hwbot.org/submission/2213728_splave_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_580_137407_marks
Is it unfair or I'm crazy?
-
This is exactly why I said 60 Global Points for every unsignificant WR is a bad ideea
-
With R4E you don't need any tricks, you concentrate on what the CPU can do... that's how a board should be. Get R4E and then you will forget everything else
-
Try with them enabled and tri-channel
P.S: You realize that on GD65 you used 2133MHz and on UD7 you used 2400MHz, right?
-
Retail C1 and it wouldnt boot from the get go. The bios he has I do not believe was the shipping bios and that was were the incompatibility lay.
I tested with C0 and still the same... I think the problem is someplace else as I'm not the only one with this problem
-
Binning on air is useless, -10 to -20 should be a good binning temperature at around 1.6v just to be sure
-
Retail CPUs are C1, maybe you mean C0?
-
It doesn’t boot, the LEDs light up but the Debug LED don’t show anything. It seems like a problem with CPU VRM, just one phase lights up and the CPU does not receive voltage...
-
Thank god someone beat me, now I have motivation to push harder
-
I think the MB is the problem, not the IMC. I tried more than one CPU and neither one did under 2550MHz RAM freq on R4E...
1.25x multiplier also don't work on ASRock X79 Extreme 4 but I managed close to 2500MHz MEM speed with the same CPU that did 2600MHz on R4E. Oh, and MSI X79A-GD65 (8D) was DOA
-
matose, can you also test 1Gb vs 2Gb modules on SBe and 4x2Gb vs 8x2Gb in 32M ?
I don't have 8 modules
I will test single-sided vs double-sided when my PSC arrive next week. For me SPI32m on SB-E is pretty useless because I have 5950MHz 2500k but no time to mount 4x2GB Elpida Hyper and get a proper score
-
It can, but you need to be smart
I did a performance analysis between 2500k, 2600k, 3930k and 3960x at 5GHz here: http://lab501.ro/procesoare-chipseturi/studiu-de-overclocking-asus-rampage-iv-extreme-sandy-bridge-e/17
Also you can find out that tri-channel is much better than dual-channel or quad-channel on SB-E here: http://lab501.ro/procesoare-chipseturi/studiu-de-overclocking-asus-rampage-iv-extreme-sandy-bridge-e/18
-
Yes, it's not possible to go above default multi (33x) when you have Turbo Off
matose - Core i5 2500K @ 5974.6MHz - 6sec 203ms SuperPi
in Result Discussions
Posted
No, I was benching 3DMark01 when in IDLE VCCSA VRM burned on the MB with flames, smoke and everything. That killed the CPU, Ithink ASUS should have implemented some kind of protection...