BootSector

Ticket ID: 189 Priority: High I think i have found some errors in description of AMD K5 CPUs. It is shown that frequencies of all K5 CPUs except K5 PR120 (Godot) exactly match their PR index, but that isn`t true. With the K5 PR120 AMD changed the naming scheme to match an equivalent Pentium`s clock speed, so the K5 PR100 was the last K5 to show its clock rate in the PR rating. The real frequencies are: \r\n\r\nK5 PR120 - 90 MHz \r\nK5 PR133 - 100 MHz \r\nK5 PR150 - 105 MHz \r\nK5 PR166 - 116 MHz\r\n\r\nAt the present moment some of the best K5 overclocking results appear to be lower than default frequency :-)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660326 This result is submitted to AGP card's page instead of PCI-E one.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660326 This result is submitted to AGP card's page instead of PCI-E one. For the first sight the problem is very simple and could be solved using "Report entry" button. But it's unactive due to previous moderator's appoving (connected with other type of claim). So i have an offer: maybe "Report" bell should never become gray because there often can be more than one problem with the result? Sorry for poor English.

Ticket ID: 124 Priority: Medium Please add this videorard. Here is GPU-Z screen:\r\nhttp://img263.imageshack.us/my.php?image=60164819wz3.gif

Ticket ID: 109 Priority: Medium Standard frequencies for Sempron LE-1150 and Pentium 3 Coppermine Slot 1 are ten times lower than they should be. So we can see a fantastic diagram of CPU overclocking statistics with two \"extreme oldies\" :-)

I've got a pretty good result of CPU frequency (going to be first), but validated it using CPU-Z version 1.46 instead of 1.47. CPU-Z validator tells that validation file is correct, but doesn't want to publish it because of inconveniet version. I have no possibility to repeat my record, so I wonder if there is any chance to submit my result? I can give you a validation file if it's necessary. Sorry for poor English.

Look at this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=734236 The result is extremely high for this processor (68% higher than second place score), and there is no verification at all. Although, "claim" button is unactive because the result was moderated. What`s the matter?