Caos Wolf

Thansk GRIFF! I've a few days off work and already have plans ? 1st one done today (even thoug it was probably the best of the bunch) Next time 4200X2 ? Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Manchester LDBHE 0601TPMW 3541 SS 1,7 3300 bench Athlon 64 x2 4200+ Manchester LDBFE 0610SPMW Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Toledo CCBWE 0609DPMW Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Manchester LDBHE 0540WPMW

Thanks guys! Kotori's run was masterfully done and had godlike mems, was really hard to top it!

Hi, can somebody please add the motherboard Rioworks HDAMA? http://valid.x86.fr/g6jm6r https://www.rioworks.com/HDAMA.htm Chipset: AMD 8111 Thanks!

Asking again two years later.

I think that our boards have -pretty much- the same limit. Both my and your cpus can easily break 320/330 so I don't think that using the 2.4 will make you gain much. ...time to heat up the soldering iron

Apparently some 01219 are able to do frequency close to the 0103 so i'm guessing that MAYBE some other batch may be able to work as good at them. That's all.I didn't want to upset you mate

M.tec 01057 TBS6408B4E-6 http://www.ebay.it/itm/Memoria-RAM-Sdram-128-dimm-168-pin-/161259620657?lgeo=1&clk_rvr_id=612750309674&vectorid=229494 These are not 0103U but for 2.5€ i would give it a try.

At that time Japanese 'clocker were a lot ahead if compared to the rest of the world. Also weren't you the one that said that the smokes of the cpu pot would also cool down the ram in the order of -30 degrees?

Uff...find it http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm (pretty much at the middle of the page right under the 59s picture) The stock rating ins't usually a precise meter of the overclocking ability of a chip If these rams are really able to do 200 2225 @ air I don't see why shuldn't be able to do 220 @ LN2

Here you can find the translation in italian http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fholicho.lib.net%2Fbench%2Fbench_104.htm ...but doesen't specify the latency of the ram. Gradus (just a couple of post above) confirmed that latency e frequency were 22257 1:1 219 cooled by LN2. Also there is the italian translation for the database http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ace-sup.com%2Fmemory%2Fmtec.html

I was talking about the ram of the database not the Holicho's ones

Hello guys, I'm sorry to intrude again but I find something that you may find interesting. First:this is the complete setup that Holicho used for sub 1m I think that he was 1:1 whit the mems at 22257 or (more probably) 22279 I made a reaserch for those mems (mtec 0103u) and came up with this table (in japanese) http://www.ace-sup.com/memory/mtec.html If I've understood it correctly those mems should be able to do 200+ mhz 22257 on air. I think those tests were made with air cooling beacuse the result of the mems i have experiece with are -pretty much- the same of mine. ...so if you are looking for the holy grail of SDRAM those should be the real deal. Also that site is a great database for sdram frequency. Hope I was helpful

Ultra necroposting to wish Turrican a happy birthday!

Another motherboard:A-trend ATC-6240V http://valid.canardpc.com/ju4dz0 Cpu-z doesn't recognize it correctly so i took a screenshot with everest (which doesn't recognize it correctly either this is a 6240V not a 6240.The first is equipped with a VIA chipset, the second with the Intel 440bx)

Great man, thanks for sharing. I'm looking forward to see your comparsion. Maybe one of this days I'll try my hyundai with AT-H chips.Never thought these thing would be good

Really? I never even see one "in the wild", but I always though that micro bga chips were the best for raw frequency.

Alright then,thanks for the confirmation

Man... ...you've been kissed by the goddes of overclock Well done!

It would be possible to have my forum nickname changed in order to match the one I use in hwbot? It's Skyline. Thanks in advance.

What i was preoccupied about was the version used. If I understand it correctly "newer" version of pcmark04 make the application run in normal priority even if set to realtime from taskmanager,so using a older version (with priority =realtime) give a substantial advantage. My pleasure man

Someone should try to find some ocz PC180 or some Tonicom PC166 (both have tonicom chips) for the high SDR frequency

To Mr.Scott: As I said yesterday I ran some more test to identify the reason to this high scores. I realize that (probably cause of my habit with spi) I've set pcmark to run in realtime and that gave me a boost of ~300 points. I wasn't sure (actually I'm still not sure) if this was legit so I made a quick search and came out with this: (From hardwareheaven 2003) And this: So I looked into the executable to see which version i was using and find out it's the 1.0.0. Then I gave a look to the hwbot rules for pcmark04 and: and Should run the exe in realtime be considered "tricking it to believe it ran faster" ? From rog.asus.com forum:HOWTO: Benchmark for HWbot I've searched also into the HWBForum but didn't find anything In conclusion:I'm still not sure if this submission shuld be considered legit. If only one person tells me that this result shuld not be considered regular I'll remove it ASAP (my life don't depends on that ) and submit my best result with priority set to normal (somthing like 1000 points) I know i wrote a wall of text (in a super mario-ish kind of english ) for a 15 years old cpu,an almost irrilevant benchmark and for one useless gold cup, but I always fell the need to be extra sure of what I'm doing. I prefer to be the incontestable last one than a suspectful first.

Not a problem mate I had intention anyway to redo it with a better video card so i will check this thing too. Maybe I'll discover a new trick to this bench

Nope no ramdisk. Actually i was quite surprised too by the result (at first i though it was a bugged run but i ran it three times and always got between 1180 and 1190). You know what?I'll delete the submission and run more test tomorrow so that we can all be sure.

Thank you very much Turrican!