Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TAGG

Members
  • Posts

    681
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by TAGG

  1. Yes but which CPU-Z i use for taht doesn't matter, just for validation that's a problem
  2. Doesn't work, neither does the win98 version or anycombination of settings in the ini. file. As soon as you hit the threshold of 5MHz new CPU-Z displays one multi lower no matter if you have it open during changing FSB or if you open it afterwards if you had old CPU-Z open...
  3. Yep booting higher helps but only linear i.e. booting 400MHz instead of 395 lifts the bug to 405 instead of 400... I will try a brandnew XP install tomorrow... At least it's only a display bug, so benches are not affected, you just need to use antique CPU-Z to have the right Frequency displayed
  4. I just discovered a strange issue when raising FSB using SetFSB in Win XP, when I add more than 5MHz of FSB the multiplier starts to drop. This only seems to appear in XP, I used the same version of SetFSB in Win 7 x64 and it worked just fine (both CPU-Z 1.85)... Setup used was a ASUS P5E64-WS EVO and a Pentium E5800 but I also had the same issue on a EP45-UD3R but with 10MHz above boot-FSB... EDIT: Seems like a CPU-Z bug, CPU-Z 1.63 displays the right multi, but I can't use that to validate for obvious reasons EDIT2: The CPU itself isn't lowering clocks at all, spi runs are nearly the same within the 1MHz where the bug accurs... Anyone ever had a simmilar problem and might know a fix? Any help would be greatly appreciated
  5. TAGG

    [WTB] Rare Adapters

    Messaged the Ney, lets hope, still looking for the 775 to 478
  6. The best G470 that you have left for me please
  7. Try not ticking "save screenshot", had the same crash when save screenshot was ticked, the benchmark will save a screenshot regardless
  8. Selling some stuff I don't need, Mainboards are tested but not for max. FSB, the Maximus Extreme can be looked up in my hardware libary. 1: Gigabyte EX38T-DQ6 (X38 with DDR3) board comes with IO-Shield, never used for oc: SOLD 2: ASUS Maximus Extreme (X38 with DDR3), solid Board, results can be found in my profile w/o IO-Shield: SOLD I'll include decent (top 10%) E7400s as socket protectors with the boards 3: EVGA X58 SLI, boards is modded for 6-Core Xeons, used in my HT-PC, no idea how it clocks, VRM Heatsink slightly bend: SOLD 4: MSI Z77 Mpower, board does 109.3 FSB with locked sandys (at least that's the max I managed in a quick test) comes with IO-Shield only: SOLD 5/6: 2 i5 750s both chips do arround 4,75GHz CB R15 and most other benches on SS @~1,55V : 20€ each Shipping is not included, shipping to EU is 5€ for the CPUs and 16€ for the boards, for international shipping please ask for quote
  9. TAGG

    [WTB] Rare Adapters

    Looking for ASUS CT-479 if anyone has one they are willing to part with, PM me EDIT: Also looking for an ASUS a C-P6S1 while I'm at it
  10. Sorry to dissappoint you all, but D9GMH don't come on 2GB Sticks only on 1GB and 512MB ones so the vitestas are NOT D9GMH As for G.Skill 0690 means 90% Hypers all other 06X0 are also elpida but most likely not hypers
  11. CPU is L845B869, haven't tryed TRFc 20 no idea, what the subs are, left everything except primarys and trfc at auto I might try measuring power draw, shouldn't be too much at 1,74V the cascade runs -90 under x265...
  12. Yep, same chip, as a matter of fact I only have one Efficiency was never my thing I don't like tweaking, just clocking It really likes voltage with LN2 and ~1,9V this chip probbably will do 570FSB...
  13. Found a funny new bug, apperently you can take more then one place in hardwarerankings now http://hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi_-_1m/rankings?start=0&hardwareTypeId=processor_1314#start=0#interval=20
  14. TAGG

    [FS] EVGA EPOWER

    What is the voltage range on the Vddr section?
  15. No they won't quadcores run better on some boards then they do on other, with a dualcore both boards did 650+ FSB... My EP45T also doesn't like to post at random times at 600+ (540 for quads) FSB still haven't found a way to fix that...
  16. First time benching the EP45-UD3P, seems to be way better than my EP45T-Extreme: http://hwbot.org/submission/3879827_tagg_cpu_frequency_xeon_x5470_5727.27_mhz
  17. I had it POST 550 without messing arround with voltages at all, so I might be able to get ~10MHz over the EP45T-Extreme... Currently i'll probably do some more 1366 and some Pentium 3 benching if i find a TUSL2-C
  18. Thanks Can some mod please have a look at round 5, it seems that it has no stages...
×
×
  • Create New...