Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Aurosonic

Members
  • Posts

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Aurosonic

  1. Just updated my old good 0088 bios to a latest beta 2004 from Asus website for Re-Size Bar support, and the perfomance of 2004 is worse than 0088. My memory RTL on 0088 was 60-61-6-7 perfectly stable for more than a half of year , and on 2004 i can't train RTL higher than 61-62-7-8 . Are there any better bios with Re-Size Bar support ? Thanks

  2. I've downloaded MaxxMem from official website, but there's no HWBot submission page in this benchmark.

    All it has is this main window without any scores like others used for submission.

    image.png.75e3282f72f64ba98f2f01536ce1b948.png

     

    There should be this submission window, but can't find it anywhere: 

    image.png.329a0edfb647025aa834b23f4cefad05.png

    image.png

  3. Anyone knows what's wrong with Fire Strike Combined scores ? Why are they fluctuates so much ?

    Any way to fix this? Here's 3 runs at the same GPU/CPU/RAM freq at same windows 10 session.

    Absolutely clean system, no background processes running, no throttling etc.

    combined.PNG

  4. 16 minutes ago, NATA 58 said:

    XP startup can not exceed 220MB/s

    I know, i've been discussing it with Leeghoofd . I've made another run where i've limited it to not exceed 220, but i can't submit it cuz of invalid validation link error:

    my new result is here: https://www.3dmark.com/pcm05/3230506 and it can't be submited cuz of hwbot engine error when you get in top10 WR it doesn't recognize the validation link. As soon as hwbot will fix this, i'll update my result. So far it's impossible to do.

  5. 15 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:

    Why is it that when you don't know the tweaks, it is always 'some kind of cheat'? 9_9

    Cuz for someone tweaks means cheats :) Under the "cheat" i ment unknown tweak or some kind of settings issue. In my opinion: when someone knows how to tweak system and don't share tweaks with others - some kind of cheating :) Although it's not

    • Confused 1
  6. Found an issue! Who would have thought that forcing off v-sync in nvidia control panel could lead to such perfomance drop when it's usually improves it by removing limits.

    It's the first benchmark with such issue in my experience.

    Here's v-sync forced off:

    2.PNG.a94d69945a8a64c566ca5d4dd269ee40.PNG

    And here's by apllication default:

    1.PNG.3e583223e75b52a67b9b42239c95a71d.PNG

  7. 26 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

    what does the subtest comparison tell you ? You won't get much info from 3dmark.com

    Heres subtests comparisons. To me it looks like some kind of cheat. Ive tried to simulate same config with 3 cores active, no HT, same Windows 7, same cpu/gpu (although gpu frequency doesn’t affect scores much), and im still at around 250k points.

    heres his result submitted on hwbot: https://hwbot.org/submission/4644564_nata_58_3dmark03_geforce_rtx_3080_280015_marks

    6C5FDF36-5AE3-43C3-B2A1-DA3AABF99FCA.jpeg

    C703D76A-0EF6-4C23-9471-FCD77C5525C1.jpeg

×
×
  • Create New...