-
Posts
51 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Aurosonic
-
-
conclusion - skip 11 gen
-
Well, I’ve tried 2004, 2101 and 0098. None of them works as good with memory as 0088.
- 1
-
Just updated my old good 0088 bios to a latest beta 2004 from Asus website for Re-Size Bar support, and the perfomance of 2004 is worse than 0088. My memory RTL on 0088 was 60-61-6-7 perfectly stable for more than a half of year , and on 2004 i can't train RTL higher than 61-62-7-8 . Are there any better bios with Re-Size Bar support ? Thanks
-
-
KRIEG MathBenchmark cant be submited giving error:
-
-
-
In w7 pcm10 always gives me lower scores. I’d suggest to use win10 for this bench
-
1 hour ago, Noxinite said:
Tried with HTTP in the link instead of HTTPS?
Yes, tried http, tried without www, it doesn't work and Leeghoofd confirmed it's hwbot bug and it's in todo list, but not prior.
- 1
-
16 minutes ago, NATA 58 said:
XP startup can not exceed 220MB/s
I know, i've been discussing it with Leeghoofd . I've made another run where i've limited it to not exceed 220, but i can't submit it cuz of invalid validation link error:
my new result is here: https://www.3dmark.com/pcm05/3230506 and it can't be submited cuz of hwbot engine error when you get in top10 WR it doesn't recognize the validation link. As soon as hwbot will fix this, i'll update my result. So far it's impossible to do.
-
3 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:
05 is no longer supported. I don't believe you can get a UL link for it anymore.
It has UL link, here's mine for example: https://www.3dmark.com/pcm05/3230506
The problem is HWBOT engine which doesn't recognize validation link if result points are within top10 WR. If it's less than TOP10 WR, submission pass succesfully
-
Can we also get fix for PCMark05 please ? Impossible to submit results if they are in top10 WR, it's always says invalid validate link
-
Dual ranks just faster, nothing special
-
Same here, cant post rsults saying incorrect fm link. Doesnt work for pcmark05 as well.
-
Works now thanks
- 1
-
-
Does results appear in your submissions as well ?
-
-
GPUPi for CPU. I've made 4 subbmissions of GPUPi for CPU (v.3.2 100M and 1B and v3.3 100M and 1B), non of them appeared in my submissions.
-
Just made 4 submissions for GPUPi (via Benchmate Datafile) and non of them appeared in my submissions.
Is it broken atm ?
-
15 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:
Why is it that when you don't know the tweaks, it is always 'some kind of cheat'?
Cuz for someone tweaks means cheats Under the "cheat" i ment unknown tweak or some kind of settings issue. In my opinion: when someone knows how to tweak system and don't share tweaks with others - some kind of cheating Although it's not
- 1
-
Found an issue! Who would have thought that forcing off v-sync in nvidia control panel could lead to such perfomance drop when it's usually improves it by removing limits.
It's the first benchmark with such issue in my experience.
Here's v-sync forced off:
And here's by apllication default:
-
26 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:
what does the subtest comparison tell you ? You won't get much info from 3dmark.com
Heres subtests comparisons. To me it looks like some kind of cheat. Ive tried to simulate same config with 3 cores active, no HT, same Windows 7, same cpu/gpu (although gpu frequency doesn’t affect scores much), and im still at around 250k points.
heres his result submitted on hwbot: https://hwbot.org/submission/4644564_nata_58_3dmark03_geforce_rtx_3080_280015_marks
-
How is it possible that i’m getting 30k lower points at the same cpu/gpu/OS config even with higher clocks?
what’s the issue or secret tweak for this test?https://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm03/6548254/3dm03/6548414#
Windows XP SP3 x86 on Z490 (tested on APEX XII)
in Comet Lake (Z490) & Rocket Lake (Z590) OC
Posted
tibx link has been updated. Unfortunately MEGA block it due to authority rights or something. Can't find ISO. I have it on CD but i have no CD-ROM right now so cant make an iso again. So it only tibx left now.