jmax_oc

Règle d'or : Tant que la fréquence monte avec la tension, il faut monter la tension. C'est le composant 'aime' ca ^^

Chipsy, unfortunately, I tested everything and I have to admit that it's the maximum of the maximum... I saw 8026MHz one time but impossible to take. Crappy CPU but very nice architecture. It gave me motivation to push with an other 8350 Strat, yep j'ai testé mais ca ne changeait rien. J'ai passé des heures à essayer de faire mieux et je n'ai pas réussi.

Edit : Not LN2 pot but the fix for LN2 pot

Dead also for me. It could be possible to make 6mn05s and 34k vantage but... no chance. Suddently, during bench, my LN2 pot just exploded => bad contact CPU / LN2 pot => CPU broken...

Hehe, I just saw Andreyang's score. I virtually have no chance except if my new 980 is a golden of golden CPU. However, I will try to beat him

Hello, is it possible to get the exact date time (date + hour GMT for example) ?

you can edit your score ('more' -> edit)

Extreme efficiency !!! Very cute QPI link !

Ok, perfect.

Congratz Topalof ! And congratz for many reasons : 1/ You never gave up and you always pushed your hardware to its limit, you win every MHz with hours and hours. Congratz for it. 2/ You didn't make the unfair and 'unfun' method of backups. You continously announced your position (first since the early beginning). What a pity that you were 'forced' to keep some backups to counter last minutes submitters. RB, for the future, I suggest a bonus / malus. An early score had to get bonus and a lastminute score had to get malus. It could be a good idea. 3/ I thought that your submission made things better in french overclocking community. It's the first time different communities was 'together' behind you and your score (the french score) For all these reasons, I would like to say you one thing : BRAVO !

Ticket ID: 398 Priority: Low Please add this card :\r\nhttp://www.jmax-hardware.com/ftpjmax_oc/MOA2009/53146.JPG\r\n\r\nThanks in advance

Yep, very good idea. I think that Spi32M, 3d01 et maybe Everest Bandwidth should be good

Ok I just wonder why some people could (TheKarmakazi) and me not.

Here is the message when I try to answer in an existing thread : "jmax_oc, you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons: Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system? If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation. " Any idea for this permission problem ?

Hmm, I don't know what to write here but if we take vids and pictures, if we told HWBot in advance about such overclocking meeting, we cannot make more... So if you don't trust us or if you will block our scores for hardware sharing, there is a huge problem since we are the most 'clean' with the most things attesting that we didn't share. Benji will do LN2 benches with his GTX285 (E86 + i7 965). If he have time, GTX295 aircooling on both platforms Casimir will make all the score which were blocked for subtests lack (GTX295 air on E8600 + i7 965) Concerning me, I will pass my 2 GTX 295 under LN2 (E86 + i7 965) : SLI tests + single tests. Anvil, we have a CPU capable to bench 5GHz 3D whereas others can only benched at 4.9GHz. So we will use it to get the best score possible. It's 100% allowed by rules so don't panic if you use some times the best CPU we have.

Maxi, that's exactly what we decided

Do you know when Neoforce will come back ? Do you know if a common decision from HWBot moderators is possible for the 10-12 remaining scores ? I repeat : it could solve the conflict immediately

Concerning myself, I'm fed up about it. I let Neoforce make the things he consider true and fair for this situation. All moderators saw our nicknames. You all saw that we are respectable members who never cheated (we aren't takapah, opb or coolaler for example). We aren't members who report 10 scores per day to earn points so it's up to you. I understand that the moderation is 'blind' since the moderation is far too weak to scan all scores. So, if we had 'malchance' to post our scores massively and malchance to be deeply scanned / checked and blocked, it's ok for me. I just hope that it wasn't against JMax-Hardware. Whatever your decision, I will brief my team showing subtests and paying all Orb licences.

Maybe you could stop all the problem by convincing Neoforce to unblock our scores... You are known to be a 'strict' moderator so for you our score could be unblocked, maybe Neoforce could do this... Thousands of scores lacks subtimings...

here all the remaing scores blocked without reporting (and unfortunately without subtests too) mika : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839437 Thor : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=831982&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839615&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839614&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839613&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839612&popup=true Casimir : 2005 : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839467&popup=true 2003 : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839465&popup=true 2001 : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839464&popup=true Dami1stm (although we asked FM to make the ORB link public) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839661 Boite de P4 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839730&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839727&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839729&popup=true Since nobody think it was hardware sharing, I think you can unblock them. If ou unblock them, we won't disturb you anyone and we perfectly understand the lessons / rules.

I sum up correctly man Quote: 1/ JMH's scores questioned for hardware sharing are => suspicious. If no complete validation subtest => blocked 2/ Others scores which are not => non suspicious. If no subtest => no problem since they aren't suspicious, subtests not required to further check validation OK. But 27 scores haven't been questionned for hardware sharing and remain blocked... I will send you a list and then you will see that nobdy reported them or told that we shared hardware.

I sum up man : 1/ JMH's scores => suspicious. If no subtest => 100% blocked (the case for 30 JMH's scores in which 27 who aren't reported by anybody) 2/ Others scores => non suspicious. If no subtest => no problem since they aren't suspicious. I perfectly understand your way to moderate (you = HWBot's crew, not jmke)

No GPUz on this screen so... should be blocked. Concerning blocked scores without subtests, we understand that it's dead for us. But we are waiting your decision about ll the score we will report for the same reasons : no subs. I'm sure that HWBot will be as strict as with us : no sub => blocked. Jmke, maybe you think I'm idiot but I'm not. You said that you tripple checked reported results and blocked them if no subs. You also said that you don't check unreported results. It can't be true since 90% of our blocked scores were not reported by users... They weren't suspicious but HWBot crew decided to block them since they have no subs. So I assume that you will do same with the 'no subs' scores we will report.

Yea easy to understand your mind, now : Without reporting, moderators can scan every score he wanted. That's what happened for us : 30 scores blocked for the only reason that they don't have subtests... And if users report scores without subtests, you won't moderate them because it's not 'suffisant to block' since it's not 'suspicious'. To sum up, we cannot do anything. Our scores have been blocked although nobody reported them. At the opposite, we can report scores with same problem (no subtest) but you won't moderate them... I hope I don't understand the little difference...

Ok right, that's all I have to know to unblock our scores and cancel the problem. We had 3 reported scores ONLY so ONLY 3 of all our scores can be blocked with a lack of subtimings. First : Anvil reported Westyle's 3d01 lack of subtests => OK since I helped westyle re-benching it. Second and third : Benchbros reported Dami1stm and Westyle 3d06 scores since he think it was hardware sharing. We proove unsharing and since we had Orb valid for them => OK. Neoforme allowed them. Concerning all the others scores, NOBODY reported them and NOBODY MAKE them suspicious so you don't need to block them. And don't say me that since Anvil and Benchbros reported 3 scores, all our scores are suspicious / doubtful or else. NOBODY else reported something agains us. So you don't have to block them with your 'rule' although they lack subtests. I hope you understand and agree my point of view. If you said that reported scores without subtests should be blocked, it also confirm that no subtest score can't be blocked without reporting. And again, don't say that all our score are suspicious, I won't accept it since it's a huge insult to consider all our 200 scores are suspicious because some were reported for bad reasons... So, you have the power to allow our scores because they all follow your rule (no reporting, no doubtful => lack of subtest isn't a reason to block them). I hope you will use this point to allow them. We understand subtests problems. We re-benched some tests. We proved unsharing and so on... Be fair : allow them since they were not reported. Allow them to calm down everybody. Allow them and also all the other link we gave and everyone will have a good week end. Allow them and HWBot will stay good in our hearth. Allow them to be honest and fair although you can consider us like 'opponents'. Allow them since they follow your ming. Allow them to avoid a sterile fight between you and us. Allow them for all the reasons. Please. It will be my last words on this thread.