buildzoid Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 hi here is a noob question... how come radeon cards dominate? is it because of unlocked voltage on those cards? my 680 suppose to perform equal to a 280x (stock) They have voltage control but more importantly CCC allows you to turn off tessellation, this is a legal tweak on HWbot so all AMD users run the benchmarks without tess and get higher scores even with lower clocks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AugustinPRiME Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 This score >> http://hwbot.org/submission/2640166 << is impossible at those RAM Settings. Not mentioning is on Windows 7! I think the real Frequnecy is @4500Mhz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint19 Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Contest ends today...well done all of you guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buildzoid Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 (edited) This score >> http://hwbot.org/submission/2640166 << is impossible at those RAM Settings. Not mentioning is on Windows 7! I think the real Frequnecy is @4500Mhz. I'll delay giving him a prize. If he can give a video proof in 48 hours that he can get within 100ms of that time with those settings I'll take it as a valid score. Edited September 30, 2014 by buildzoid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Trouffman Posted September 30, 2014 Crew Share Posted September 30, 2014 LEss than 2 hours left ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newlife Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 This score >> http://hwbot.org/submission/2640166 << is impossible at those RAM Settings. Not mentioning is on Windows 7! I think the real Frequnecy is @4500Mhz. His initial time is the dead giveaway that he's running a higher speed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGI78 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 http://hwbot.org/submission/2640589 - COMIAS commented on his own score: 4 hours ago – Optimization sub timings. OS: Win Server 2003 R2 x64 optimized... Dreams =)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newlife Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 No amount of sub timings will make up for 2400 c10 given haswell does best with 2800 c9 with Samsung's on air as this isn't AMD we are about and I doubt a win xp 64 bit based OS can do so well given how slow 64 bit xp is at 32m but I could be wrong since I've never tried windows sever for 32m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint19 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Server is good but not that good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 1, 2014 Author Share Posted October 1, 2014 Christian, our Head of Moderating will have a look at the scores too. Stay tuned for the final ranking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin White Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 GG cowcotland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COMIAS Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 As I explained to the submission, I mainly adjusted sub timings. This setting is barely modfified, because there are too many options. The first time I adjusted it was to see the potential of these settings, and when I saw that it changed a lot of things, I did keep on digging in. And no, I do not use Windows XP, but Win2003R2 64x. For Win2003R2 for x64, I used the original CD win2003R2, I took the Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise 64x version to which I did all available updates. I set it up and disabled any unnecessary services, performing optimizations. I also used some availaible tweaks. And if he yells because there is a reward, be assured that I do not run after DOGEcoin. I just made it for my own pleasure. If it was not about reward, I think we would not have this discution. And I recall that early in the OC4DOGE, I was taken apart by some of you on the submission of Fire Stike with Sapphire HD7970 Toxic in 6GB. For 3Dmark display a R9-280X. (http://hwbot.org/submission/2622512_) Cordially COMIAS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGI78 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Any 64-bit operating system penalizes you between 6 and 10 seconds regardless of optimization and tweaks used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newlife Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Dude no way. I don't know I missed it but ht is enabled which makes this as websmile said a joke and I won't believe that this legit without video proof within a few hundred ms but even then I'll still have doubts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CL3P20 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 no wazza with 64bit.. no maxmem.. = no initial time like that.. lolz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint19 Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 I was really trying to not post here. But many people here know that this time isn't possible with those settings, OS and frequency. Even, if you take a look of his best SP32M result, you will see that's running at very similar settings on RAM but @4.9GHz with a 4.368s initial time. There isn't way that he can get a better initial time with almost 500MHz less in that CPU. Best result: http://hwbot.org/submission/2640878_comias_superpi___32m_core_i7_4790k_6min_28sec_487ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taloken Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 COMIAS's result removed from contest. End of the story, thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buildzoid Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Ok so now that that's over with I'd like everyone who is 1st 2nd or 3rd in one of the stages to PM their Dogecoin addresses so I can send out the prizes. 1st place in any stage is: 48,190 D 2nd place in any stage is: 24,095 D 3rd place in any stage is: 12,047 D If I don't get a PM with your address by the 10th I will give your prize to the next highest score. If you don't know how to do that please read this page: http://dogecoin.com/getting-started/ if that doesn't solve your issues just PM me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buildzoid Posted October 5, 2014 Share Posted October 5, 2014 I need those Dogecoin addresses the only person who has given me one so far is darkgregor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 6, 2014 Author Share Posted October 6, 2014 Hi Buildzoid, Maybe I can help reaching out via email? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buildzoid Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Hi Buildzoid, Maybe I can help reaching out via email? Yeah that be great I got some people to send me address already so here's a list of who you don't need to email: Darkstar[GER] Alex@ro suzuki darkgregor AugustinPRiME Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.