I.nfraR.ed Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 (edited) As it had been discussed before - you don't have reliable way of verifying the results. You have to rely on existing results and a common sense what is possible and what not. But that's not reliable enough. Because of this, asking for rankings is pointless, I think, although I'd love to play too. Involving points would make it appealing for cheaters. I'm speaking more generally..about all 32M low-clock challenges, not just Haswell-E. Heck, I don't even have the platform. Edited August 21, 2015 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancop Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 So...create a wrapper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 But then all current results are invalid and scores will likely be slower as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancop Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Who cares??? Gpupi gave points within one month...same for geekbench and so on...let the wrapper work as a beta for 3 month...many will use that one in other forums as well! Then launch it and we all have fun with doing a real mem benchmark! Do we have any real mem benchmark? No....not in my opinion... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Geekbench is a pretty good memory benchmark but you're right... for the most part this isolates the CPU and makes it just a memory and tweaking benchmark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancop Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Should we create a separate thread, cause I think this worth for each kind of cpu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 21, 2015 Author Share Posted September 21, 2015 Updated OP. Just FYI, I'm only updating the thread if there's a post since my last post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 22, 2015 Author Share Posted October 22, 2015 Updated OP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l0ud_sil3nc3 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 So decided to test out some B-Die on X99 since I haven't done it. 4G 5G Corsair Elite B-Die @ X99M Killer 3.1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolhand411 Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 (edited) same here ,only two modules 4G coolhandluke41`s SuperPi - 32M score: 7min 21sec 250ms with a Core i7 5820K Edited August 29, 2016 by coolhand411 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 21, 2016 Author Share Posted October 21, 2016 Updated opening post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAMBA Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 6 min 14 sec 369 ms SAMBA`s SuperPi - 32M score: 6min 14sec 369ms with a Core i7 5820K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unityofsaints Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Anyone rebenched this on B-die? I have a feeling 1st is achievable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SparkysAdventure Posted April 21, 2021 Share Posted April 21, 2021 Sparky necrobump ftw, commenting here as I may try this out "someday" Screen from @Dancop when looking at other results here, looks like that 52+ cache matters a whole lot could make taking #1 kinda tough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.