Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Bug reports : Delete (combine with existing) false CPU categories


Recommended Posts

  • Crew

Ticket ID: 1075


Priority: High


1. Combine this category: http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_2235 with this http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_930 and delete the first one.\r\n\r\n2. Delete this category: http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1325 these never existed, even CPU world doesn\'t know of such and ATM it\'s much more trustful than our database (I hope this will change in time though I don\'t have a chance to help you on this).\r\n\r\n3. Delete this category: http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_346 it didn\'t exist either.\r\n\r\n4. Delete both of these: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_1.4ghz_northwood - there are two of them on the hw subfamily page: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=16\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/community/submission/822670_ice_angel_cpu_z_pentium_4_1.4ghz_northwood_4683.27_mhz\r\n

the id of this result is 509168, cpu-z shows wrong cpu identivikation, its not a 1.4es, its a 2.8c
That means that the result is identified incorrectly. This bug comes out during overclocking and is quite known (sometimes Celerons are identified as Xeons and like that). Will report to CPU-Z author for a work around. I know the probable reason of this bug.\r\n\r\n5. Rename \"Pentium 4 1.6Ghz Willamette\" into \"Pentium 4 1.6Ghz Willamette s478\" like the rest are.\r\n\r\n6. Making a space between the frequency and \"GHz\" would fix the bug \"when the CPUs are listed as 2.0 then 2.26 and then 2.2\".\r\n\r\n7. Replace \"Ghz\" with \"GHz\" :)\r\n\r\n8. Rename \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz A Northwood\" into \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz Northwood\" and \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz Prescott\" into \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz A Prescott\" - Intel gives the \"A\" suffix for the new generation models which was definitely not Northwood.\r\n\r\n9. Same here - rename \"Pentium 4 2.6Ghz A Northwood\" with \"Pentium 4 2.6Ghz Northwood\" no need in \"A\" suffix since it\'s a regular core, not a new model with existing frequency.\r\n\r\n10. There were only five models of Pentium 4 2.8 for socket 478 - the \r\nregular 2.8 (Northwood, 100FSB)\r\n2.8A (Prescott, 133FSB)\r\n2.8B (Northwood, 133FSB)\r\n2.8C (Northwood, 200FSB, HT)\r\n2.8E (Prescott, 200FSB, HT)\r\nSo this category should be deleted: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_2.8ghz_northw._200_fsb from what I\'ve seen all of the results are 2.8B (Northwood, FSB133 multi 21) not even 2,8C with 200FSB. I bet these categories are messed up not only by default FSB but even by cores (once the categories are fixed, I\'ll check the results and report to place them in right categories).\r\n\r\n11. Pentium 4 2.8Ghz E Prescott (HT) is called \"Northwood\" in the cores column. Rename to Prescott.\r\n\r\nAt the moment, this is it for desktop s478 :D stay tuned for reports on other sections.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

Sorry, Karl. If it's not hard, could you report on ticket progress here? It's harder to recheck all the categories that are reported than a single thread ;)


I see big improvement, as I thought, the spacing solved the "2.26GHz before 2.2GHz" problem.


I remind about section 7 - rename "Ghz" into "GHz". By leaving "hz" you disrespect Hertz, the guy who was a physicist and he's German BTW :D


And even though you can't delete categories, I think you could move results from there to the right categories ;)


Thank you for the cleaning!


P.S. Rename "Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz A Northw. (100 FSB)" at least into "Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz Northw. (100 FSB)" - without the "A" letter. Or better in "Pentium 4 2.8 GHz Northwood" like it's with 2.4 GHz CPUs. Missed this one.

Edited by Antinomy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
ATM I see that sections 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 are done completely.


There's left "GHz" issue, the 2.8 GHz Northwood renaming and moving the results from categories that are going to be deleted ;)


And kicking admins from time to time.




2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 are done. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

Thanks, Karl! :)

As for the 10. - were did you move the results? I think there could be results from different categories. I've reported on 2.8, 2.8A, 2.8E a few days before so if you tell were you moved them, I won't have to check them again. Or you looked through the results moving them in appropriate categories?


Just get me right - I don't find a reason to offense smbd. In fact I only try to make a nice thing closer to a perfect one. I don't spend my time on bad things, only on the ones that deserve it. So I don't make any critics if it's a bad thing - only if it's not good enough but can be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...