xxbassplayerxx Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 4840!!! 5000 here we come :banana: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWeez Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 whao! awesome well done dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barti27 Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 Great Job Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Achill3uS Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 oh yess, SOC Force killing it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. DB! Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 gr8! nice as always! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kim55 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Cool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OC Maximus Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Ridiculousness. Noice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GtiJason Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 How come the verification url link / checksum is saying 1209mhz? CPU-Z version or IDK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_Alberino Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 How come the verification url link / checksum is saying 1209mhz? CPU-Z version or IDK 1209.5 * 2 = 2419 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GtiJason Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 1209.5 * 2 = 2419 That's right, but the other verification links say 24xx Mhz to equal close to 5000mhz. He would need 1209.5*4 to equal the 4838mhz (2419) required for 2nd place globally or for ddr4 mem. freq. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Strange, ratio is correct but maybe cpuz bug? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Yea, a bug with CPU-Z. As far as I remember, the original v1.72 reported the frequency as double of the real frequency so the site fixed it by dividing the frequency by two. Hicookie got a beta version to test and help resolve the detection problem and uploaded this score with it. The frequency was real, but the fix can't distinguish between the original and the beta so it divides Cookie's score too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.