sorry but your score isnt correct.

the 3:5 ratio is not acceptable.

also none of 2gb dddr2 chips can not set this frequency...

also your 4slots is full )))

Yes all slots are full,that's what even made this OC better imo,i tried with a single stick,the board was not the factor nor was the full slots.This frequency is legit.And why is a 3:5 ratio unacceptable? My score is correct.Could have went higher had the sticks allowed for more latency,could only go from a 5 to a 7,as those were the only options the sticks had as far as Latency timing adjustments.

I now know about the 3:5 divider issue,i will adjust it.

Well, as long, as the score is validated by CPU-Z and it is: http://valid.x86.fr/p3fztx

I did not see a problem. Certainly it is not divider. Anyone can use what divider he please...

 

BTW, WR in DDR2 frequency is 900MHz:

http://hwbot.org/hardware/memory/ddr2%20sdram/

http://hwbot.org/submission/1025909_shahryar_neo___baran_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_900_mhz

...with 1:2 divider

 

Mine best use also 1:2 divider and no-one is saying that it cannot be used:

http://valid.canardpc.com/mnqznf

 

...tough I not aimed at maximum frequency yet...

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?199241-3-5-divider-on-X38-P35-X48-P45-is-broken-is-2-3-in-reality-on-400-strap

 

the 1:2 is not the prob-its only 3:5

3:5 divider on X38/P35/X48/P45 is broken, is 2:3 in reality on 400 strap

 

Oh, so on the X38/P35/X48 and P45 chipsets do this 3:5 divider cause false scores (too high)... Never knew that before, so that make the frequency invalid.

Excuse me mohammad2284, your this sub also using 3:5 ratio.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2651491_mohammad2284_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_748.4_mhz

Edited August 13, 201510 yr by Kotori

Heh, that is maybe where mohammad2284 learn that 3:5 is bugged on certain older chipsets and now he is just spreading the knowledge