Bustah Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 No jmke you spoke mods as a collective your words not mine, my discussion here was with you only. I addressed the fact that you came accross a bit patronising. thats all. You responded to that which is fine. basically you told me im beinmg trivial exagerating and not to be upset with a smiling face, I think im entitled to respond to that and not just let you do it without responding to you. The matter is over as far as im concerned and im sorry it went this way. sometimes its wise to try to understand the other part'ys perspective and not just jump on the defensive. as I said twice already I do appreciate what you do, anfd I know it cant be easy. regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stealth Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 @jmke, There is a mistake in here, Have a look at the attachments. This is the second and third score in PiFast in Celeron s478 320: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617269 2nd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653467 3rd The second score is 60.73s(the system has give him 60.0s) and the third 60.56s Can you please ckeck it and correct it? Edit:Also check the fourth score is well,it says 62.0s and the calculation on the screenshot says 62.93s. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620077 I haven't been any further.... stealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 How about with resolution 3DMark06 in laptop's card? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted May 22, 2008 Share Posted May 22, 2008 I got question, why all of my old X300SE scores disapper? Only one is now matched to X300 non SE (??) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644155 Can I ask WTF? I want my cups back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Could a mod please check this. I did use the report tool but im curious if they should stay in the same category or not. thanks in advance. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=736593 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728110 If you look at the gpuz screens for both you will see the cards report different architecture and die shrink size,bandwidth and texture rates are different too, but both agp? any ideas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TITUL Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1196 This category is for (!) AGPx8 (!) videocards, not pci-ex16. Please, solve this problem. Move results into pci-e category of x1650 pro ddr2 P.S. All results for x1650 are mixed up. Try to fix it or clean=) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 Sorry to be a pain jmke but this score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=736593 was achieved with a 'r423' gpu. the category is for 'r420' gpu's. it must belong to the 'r423' category, if its an agp card then maybe it should be in a new category? please advise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 Thanks jmke, I did wonder if it was an omega driver error, if it is, I have no problem. thanks for your info too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 Invalid verification and still some points,I have reported few times.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olegk@ Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 (edited) jmke Hi! You've blocked my 3dmark03 result, and the reason was "suspect score, used of MIPMAP tweak which is not allowed at HWBot". But I wasn't using this tweak, I have submitted not only screenshot, but also an ORB-link. I think you know that if mipmap tweak is used, then 3dmark03 won't let you to publish score. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5820132 Edited May 30, 2008 by olegk@ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 older versions of Wprime sometimes report invalid checksum even when there's nothing wrong. See why we don't want to go back to older Wprime versions ? if the score is in line with what other are getting with same CPU; there is no reason to block. The benchmark was run with the hardware mentioned and autosubmitted more than a year ago with version 1.43; E6300 @ ~4000Mhz scores the time he has. If you say so,no prob... Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olegk@ Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 jmke thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toutatoc Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738608 Duron 750 not a 700 ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726187 The same thing ? Duron 800 not a 700 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DataNusse Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738608 Duron 750 not a 700 ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726187 The same thing ? Duron 800 not a 700 ? The multi are unlockt on the CPU by pen mod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I have reported these 2 results,but nothing happend.Wrong version of wprime,invalid and still some points: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738435 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739723 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I have reported these 2 results,but nothing happend.Wrong version of wprime,invalid and still some points:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738435 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739723 Fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I have reported these 2 results,but nothing happend.Wrong version of wprime,invalid and still some points:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738435 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739723 fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 fixed Thanks and one more,valid but version of wprime is wrong : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738422 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 ok, fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 hey hey give us some time Proste you reported it today and already ask about it less than 24 hours later! One of them I have reported about week ago,so that's why... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Hmm,I know about Today,but..maybe some misunderstanding,sorry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toutatoc Posted June 6, 2008 Share Posted June 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716126 Wrong Wprime after 01/01/08 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted June 11, 2008 Share Posted June 11, 2008 (edited) This score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506119 I reporte recently as having no proof at all. It was checked by a mod who validated it as an old score. My problem here is that this score was not in this category untill june of this year? meaning if its an old score it has been moved here from another category recently? So if it was moved to this category recently then surely it should be updated with proof. I wanted to check the users scores to see if it had been moved from a x800 pcie category but cant even find the user in the team the score has him linked to? I just checked the evolution ranking on this, the score was ranked 27th untill june 08, this category gpu wasnt even created until very recently because I requested it. So how can it 'being an old score be validated without proof? Edited June 11, 2008 by BUSTAMOVE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Athlon XP 2000+ in Athlon XP 1700 Palomino (M=11) categ: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=742656 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=742608 Please, move to correct category. Tnx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Hey, I'm writing to describe my results in Radeon 9550 category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745049 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745050 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745053 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745056 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745057 Firstly, sorry for that I don't use GPU-Z (I have only one screen with GPU-Z), but when any test was end and I want to open GPU-Z it suspend PC, so I used RivaTuner. Next problem is that in screen you can see it is radeon 9600, but 9550 VGuru have jumper to swich overclocking option. So, we can see PC detect card like 9600... Why I wrote it? I want please moderators to check results and put theirs like "This result has been moderated by the hwbot crew...", becouse I won't have problems with it in future. Sorry for may crappy english. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.