maxine Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 (edited) Looks like 9600.... I have the 4CoreDual, and 9550...i havent problems. Use official approved ATI drivers (not Omegas), and retry GPU-Z. Try lowering VAGP in the 4CoreDual. Edited June 14, 2008 by maxine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted June 15, 2008 Share Posted June 15, 2008 (edited) It isn't problem with a mobo or card. I think the CPU platform is not stable(stable only for 3DMarks, but not at all), becouse sametimes I have the same problem with CPU-Z. Sorry, I forgot to attach photos of card: and screen with GPU-Z: Edited June 15, 2008 by Narmer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alibabar Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Admins, can you please check those results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745735 (No GPUz, CPUz and verification!) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745407 (too high score, without GPUz and verification!) thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alibabar Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Sorry, thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted June 18, 2008 Share Posted June 18, 2008 How about drivers? Can we use only official approved ATI/nVidia drivers or modded too? How about my earlier post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted June 18, 2008 Share Posted June 18, 2008 Official Approved drivers is always prefered. This avoid "Cheat" with a hacked driver. A correct CPU-Z vga identification may be a must. Post images without correct validation is futile. All 9550 must seeing as "9550" not 9600. I think u need a HWbot crew "in situ" for validation (or record a video that show the vga, and bench result). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted June 18, 2008 Share Posted June 18, 2008 So,what about old results of cards like Radeon 9800SE etc with software (driver) unblock 8 pipelines? If I can't use now modded drivers so where is a justice? Or what with scores for example 9700 modded to PRO etc? One card and two scores... I want to show and discuss my scores, sorry, but I am not a cheater, so if I must show video I will do it, but I don't have a video camera. I don't add scores and I don't stay in hiding, but I want to be honest and I expect the same from others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted June 18, 2008 Share Posted June 18, 2008 Narmer, im sure u talking the truth and honest. But is logical doubt about a GPU-Z showing 9600 instead 9550. Let´s wait until jmke examine the results... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 (edited) Ok, I don't know how can I do vmem mod on this model 9550 (Abit VGuru), so I must use jumper to overclocking mode (better voltage for vmem, but show as 9600), but it is still 9550 card, but ok, so let's wait. maxine thx for post and understanding. Edited June 19, 2008 by Narmer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 Athlon XP 2000+ (See CPUZ) in Athlon XP 1700 Palomino (Multi=11) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=742656 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=742608 -------------------------------------------------------------------- No link or validation to probe result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652115 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 Jmke, a own a Xp1700 with L1 linked....and multi 11 (its default multi) If u examine this results...can see M=11 like me, But "Athlon XP 2000+". This user takes an XP2000+ and link L1 and M=11... See My "composite image" for CLARIFICATION..... http://img206.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=59288_a_122_195lo.jpg So, "viperius" results are invalid.... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=742656 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=742608 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 OK. Tnx for the info jmke. Keep the good work!. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opendoor Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732644 Cpu is an amd mobile athlon 64 3200+. It's possible to fix it? Thanks in advance :-) opendoor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732644 Cpu is an amd mobile athlon 64 3200+. It's possible to fix it? Thanks in advance :-) opendoor If you look at the black field on the CPU you'll see if it says mobile AMD Athlon or just AMD Athlon. If it's the last one, then you don't have a mobile chip - even if it's lidless in the first place. I know that, as I have like 4 or 5 myself, and I was a bit surprised when I saw that they weren't mobiles - just non-lidded desktop CPUs. "Real" mobiles DO exist, they're just a bit more rare:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opendoor Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 Thanks knopf, but mine is a mobile, like you can see in mine other bench posted, specially the cpu-z. 3 tipes of cpu, are used in laptop with socket 754 and all of these can be used on some desk mobos: - normal (desktop) a64 and sempron with his. -turion without his -mobile a64 and sempron without his. Sorry for the OT. Goodnight Stefano Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 This score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748050 and this score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748069 Were accomplished with this CPU: http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SL8ZZ A socket 775 processor with 90NM technology and 1MB Cache. I don't know about the others in those categories but my scores are with this CPU:http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL6PG A socket 478 CPU with 0.13 Micron technology and 512MB Cache. Pretty sure it is an unfair comparison, is there not a separate category for the 524 CPU's? I reported these scores a week ago with the tool and no changes have been made so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted July 6, 2008 Share Posted July 6, 2008 In this category: http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=1324 All the sreenshoots dosen't show the screen resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=751071 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=751073 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=751074 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=751075 thx! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 This score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748050 and this score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748069 Were accomplished with this CPU: http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SL8ZZ A socket 775 processor with 90NM technology and 1MB Cache. I don't know about the others in those categories but my scores are with this CPU:http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL6PG A socket 478 CPU with 0.13 Micron technology and 512MB Cache. Pretty sure it is an unfair comparison' date=' is there not a separate category for the 524 CPU's? I reported these scores a week ago with the tool and no changes have been made so...[/quote'] Any progress with this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barron_Greenback Posted July 11, 2008 Share Posted July 11, 2008 PcMark05 - No validation link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=741747 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 This score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748050 and this score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748069 Were accomplished with this CPU: http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SL8ZZ A socket 775 processor with 90NM technology and 1MB Cache. I don't know about the others in those categories but my scores are with this CPU:http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL6PG A socket 478 CPU with 0.13 Micron technology and 512MB Cache. Pretty sure it is an unfair comparison' date=' is there not a separate category for the 524 CPU's? I reported these scores a week ago with the tool and no changes have been made so...[/quote'] Hellooooo... Everyone on holidays? :nana: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 I actually think that you are correct. I think there is a post about RB being away on holiday some place here on the forum. As far as I know he is the only one that can change the software, sorry Just Learnin' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 I actually think that you are correct. I think there is a post about RB being away on holiday some place here on the forum. As far as I know he is the only one that can change the software, sorry Just Learnin' Hey there 1Day! Miss ya... Thanks for the reply :woot: Thought I missed a funeral. RB is on holiday, I dont have the resources atm to moderate; and hardware mod is afk I think;) 2 replies!!! :banana: Thanks for verifying jmke, about to start a vacation myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jurek Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 i heard he was going... but in 3 weeks time i guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 Well it should be pretty straight forward when the time comes to moderate this: Originally Posted by Just Learnin' This score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748050 and this score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=748069 Were accomplished with this CPU: http://processorfinder.intel.com/Det...px?sSpec=SL8ZZ A socket 775 processor with 90NM technology and 1MB Cache. I don't know about the others in those categories but my scores are with this CPU:http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SL6PG A socket 478 CPU with 0.13 Micron technology and 512MB Cache. Pretty sure it is an unfair comparison, is there not a separate category for the 524 CPU's? I reported these scores a week ago with the tool and no changes have been made so... He posted in the wrong category, this is his CPU: http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1050 And he posted his score in this CPU category: http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_332 I see Massman has been around, is he not capable of remedying this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted July 14, 2008 Share Posted July 14, 2008 This cant be right? look at the guys in 2nd and 3ed place compared to this? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=751786 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.