71proste Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 (edited) Hi there. Please move these scores to correct category which is 7300GT DDR3 instead of 7300GT DDR2 The score it's impossible for the clocks used pls look at the other scores http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548232 and another one here: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=552063 even the description says Galaxy 7300GT DDR3 Cheers Edited July 22, 2009 by 71proste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReverendMaynard Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 (edited) It's not a cheat. AFAIK. then why did a mod demand that he remove it from hwbot in personal emails telling him that he cheated? valid checksum, valid screenshot, he used XP and it was still c***-blocked. Edited July 22, 2009 by ReverendMaynard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 then why did a mod demand that he remove it from hwbot in personal emails telling him that he cheated? valid checksum, valid screenshot, he used XP and it was still c***-blocked. I don't know, but I also questioned some "too fast for the clocks"-wPrime scores, and then I got the message that this tweak was legal. PErhaps it's not the same tweak..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alibabar Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Moderators, can you please check again this suspicious result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714443 Compare "GFX" score (36192) with other results in this category (best one ~24500). Clue: maybe it's a CF result (compared with those frequencies in CF category)? All required details (CPUz, GPUz) are missing! Brgds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 I don't know, but I also questioned some "too fast for the clocks"-wPrime scores, and then I got the message that this tweak was legal. PErhaps it's not the same tweak..? sorry which tweak? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Please check this one: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=872620 1. Wrong category (he used a 8800GTX, not a 9800GT) 2. The verification Link is not working. Thx! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 sorry which tweak? I don't know it - or I'd use it myself (if it's legal ofc) It's got something to do with Vista... that's all I know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 (edited) I don't know much about it too my wprime scores are so low heh just to remind: Hi there. Please move these scores to correct category which is 7300GT DDR3 instead of 7300GT DDR2 The score it's impossible for the clocks used pls look at the other scores http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548232 and another one here: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=552063 even the description says Galaxy 7300GT DDR3 Cheers Edited July 23, 2009 by 71proste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569403 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=536823 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=527553 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567856 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526386 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581782 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=558729 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723075 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=542716 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546231 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500974 dead verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568976 no cpuz/memory http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559760 no cpuz/memory http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=515903 no cpuz/memory http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526445 no cpuz/memory http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526446 no cpuz/memory http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568561 no cpuz/memory http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505271 wrong screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617890 wrong screenshot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
komadyret Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 I honestly haven't looked over all these linked scores, but I don't think any of these are less than a year old, if not two. We can't expect users to keep all verification data for all future, forums loose data, websites go down, and rules have changed too. At some point screenshot requirements was leaner. I don't think there are any reasons to take action against any/most of these linked scores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 too old to be moderated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnksss Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 i have a question or two...like....what is this suppose to mean? Result event log. date event user description 27 Jul 2009 09:58 created johnksss manual online submission 27 Jul 2009 11:04 checked (crew) Massman checked by a moderator () 27 Jul 2009 11:06 reported (crew) Massman reported by crew (Very high GPU scores; new drivers?) 27 Jul 2009 02:52 reported (crew) NeoForce reported by crew (GT2 5fps higher than GT1 - again like Fugger`s run?) and when i went back to correct my memory from 2040mhz to 1738 mhz...i get this... 27 Jul 2009 06:58 modified johnksss manually modified by owner (johnksss) - reason: no reason given 27 Jul 2009 07:03 modified johnksss manually modified by owner (johnksss) - reason: no reason given and how come it's not showing up in world records? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Your score is quite out of line when you compare it to all the other scores in the database. Could be driver issue, driver improvement, bugged run ... we don't know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnksss Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 driver issue huh.. im running windows 7 beta 186.18 which is whql if you check all through orb you will see i have quite a few records in there..starting with laptops. gateway 6831 - 6860 - 7811 sager np9262 before orb jacked it up with allowing gts250 in the mobile card data base. so what...i need to take my machine down to evga and run it in front of them for verification? because this is starting to sound pretty far fetched. i didn't hear one word till i cracked the top 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486 Persevering I am, young Jedi! I know it`s annoying to move around some unimportant scores, but they are already moderated so there`s nothing I can do to help you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 driver issue huh..im running windows 7 beta 186.18 which is whql if you check all through orb you will see i have quite a few records in there..starting with laptops. gateway 6831 - 6860 - 7811 sager np9262 before orb jacked it up with allowing gts250 in the mobile card data base. so what...i need to take my machine down to evga and run it in front of them for verification? because this is starting to sound pretty far fetched. i didn't hear one word till i cracked the top 10. A bugged run can happen to anyone. Wouldn't be the first time a score was pulled because of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnksss Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 hummm, well i can run these numbers pretty much at will so not sure how that's a bug. and every one at evga has been following my steady climb..nothing personal but im going to have to dissagree. my runs are not bugged. i don't submit bugged runs..who does that help? unless of course windows 7 is bugged, then i guess they would have to take that up with them:) (them being microsoft) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819813 regular 5000+ Brisbane, not BE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aditya Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=875497 this is my result which is repeatedly being reported by user "tionio" saying screenie should include nv panel showing physx off which iirc is not required according to HWBOT rules? Also looking at the cpu score 4.3ghz 920 (26500) its obvious that physx is off. that guy is purposely reporting my score because i had reported his score in this same category wherein his 920@4.2ghz had scored 52000 in the cpu test indicating physx is on. can any mod please have a look at my score, thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Hi there.Please move these scores to correct category which is 7300GT DDR3 instead of 7300GT DDR2 The score it's impossible for the clocks used pls look at the other scores http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548232 and another one here: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=552063 even the description says Galaxy 7300GT DDR3 Cheers jmke if you don't mind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aditya Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 not required: http://www.hwbot.org/benchmark.application.info.do?applicationId=17#rules thanks for the clarification jmke. could you then please remove the moderator flag from the result? and also that user 'tionio' is reporting my results for no reason whatsoever. he's reported this result now which is completely legit - http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=875494 could you do something about this please ? thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 Moderators, can you please check again this suspicious result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714443 Compare "GFX" score (36192) with other results in this category (best one ~24500). Clue: maybe it's a CF result (compared with those frequencies in CF category)? All required details (CPUz, GPUz) are missing! Brgds Issue still unsolved :woot: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giukey79 Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 Two bench identical or two category and screen not completed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=882652 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=882767 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=882184 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=882635 Sorry for my english. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Monkey Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Every Day more and more wrong Cards in this Category http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/GeForce%209800%20GT%20DDR2 and one of them is checked and i can not repord it http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=872620 And is not a 9800 GT DDR2 ....is it a Xfx 8800 ultra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4ng3ldust Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Please check the results of my teammate. Verification links are fixed and working. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705482 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705508 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705512 Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.