Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here


Recommended Posts

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486

Nothing happened yet.

Some goes for this one, which was mentioned by u22 (thx ;) ) in this thread. I reported it already, too. See, neither I open threads for trivial requests as so much other guys do immediately (and get an answer asap unfortunately...), nor I annoy moderators somewhere else. But this official modest way leads to nothing and I have no idea what else to do.

? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I'm not sure if I'm right with this so I don't mean any offense to 3oh6 and if it's not a problem that's fine.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860974

 

PCMark05 default resolution is 1024x768, his res is 800x600. Does a lower res give a higher score in PCM05 like 3DM?

 

I have tested this tonight, a number of tests score a lot higher.

 

Can this be blocked please? I am sure it is an honest mistake by Jody. :)

 

Another one: EDIT: reported the normal way ;)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=900564

Edited by r1ch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have tested this tonight, a number of tests score a lot higher.

 

Can this be blocked please? I am sure it is an honest mistake by Jody. :)

 

Another one: EDIT: reported the normal way ;)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=900564

 

Read this:

http://hwbot.org/benchmark.application.info.do?applicationId=9

Where did you see the rule about "standard resolution" for PCMark 2005?

Many people posted results with 1280x1024, 1024x768 etc...

And the difference is not so high between 1024x768 and 800x600: about 50-100 points from my tests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think 1024x768 is the default PCMark settings?

It is not possible to set resolution in PCMark 2005 - it will be changed automatically for each subtest.

For example, it will be changed in any case to 1024x768 for Transparent Windows.

In other case - what do you think, all those results with resolutions <> 1024x768 should be blocked too?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=892295

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=859879

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=813496

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833129

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784934

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=765995

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=857324

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860974

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=868734

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think 1024x768 is the default PCMark settings?

It is not possible to set resolution in PCMark 2005 - it will be changed automatically for each subtest.

For example, it will be changed in any case to 1024x768 for Transparent Windows.

In other case - what do you think, all those results with resolutions <> 1024x768 should be blocked too?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=892295

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=859879

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=813496

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833129

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784934

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=765995

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=857324

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860974

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=868734

 

Allright, I thought that was the "only" default solution:p I'll let some more experienced PCMark mods decide what's right or wrong here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
Interesting... When I look at the screen shot I see one core one thread, and the screen shot is not complete... ??? If I had known the submission was made with two processors I would have never made this post :)

 

Thanks for the clarification Turrican.

the p3's are only 1 core/thread, but it's a dual cpu system.

yeah, but the field where "processor #1" on the cpu-z tab is, is "white". it's a dual cpu system.

 

for example look on that screenshot here, what i mean. ;)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657987

Edited by Turrican
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486

Nothing happened yet.

Some goes for this one, which was mentioned by u22 (thx ) in this thread. I reported it already, too. See, neither I open threads for trivial requests as so much other guys do immediately (and get an answer asap unfortunately...), nor I annoy moderators somewhere else. But this official modest way leads to nothing and I have no idea what else to do.

I mentioned this stuff in this thread over four months ago including several reminders and didn`t get a single word as an answer until today. So even if it would be my fault and my whole concern would be so wrong that I should actually feel ashamed, you could atleast teach me so. But this is very disappointing. :(

 

Edit: And by the way the Pentium 4 505 isn`t Paxville, which is claimed here. Dual-core-Xeon CPUs for socket 604 had Paxville cores, but Pentium 4 505 have Prescott ones.

Edited by Hyperhorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...