Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

Recommended Posts

No jmke you spoke mods as a collective your words not mine, my discussion here was with you only. I addressed the fact that you came accross a bit patronising. thats all.

You responded to that which is fine. basically you told me im beinmg trivial exagerating and not to be upset with a smiling face, I think im entitled to respond to that and not just let you do it without responding to you.


The matter is over as far as im concerned and im sorry it went this way. sometimes its wise to try to understand the other part'ys perspective and not just jump on the defensive. as I said twice already I do appreciate what you do, anfd I know it cant be easy.



Link to comment
Share on other sites



There is a mistake in here,

Have a look at the attachments.

This is the second and third score in PiFast in Celeron s478 320:


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617269 2nd

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653467 3rd


The second score is 60.73s(the system has give him 60.0s) and the third 60.56s


Can you please ckeck it and correct it?


Edit:Also check the fourth score is well,it says 62.0s and the calculation on the screenshot says 62.93s.



I haven't been any further....





Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could a mod please check this. I did use the report tool but im curious if they should stay in the same category or not. thanks in advance.






If you look at the gpuz screens for both you will see

the cards report different architecture and die shrink size,bandwidth and texture rates are different too, but both agp? any ideas?



Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi! You've blocked my 3dmark03 result, and the reason was "suspect score, used of MIPMAP tweak which is not allowed at HWBot". But I wasn't using this tweak, I have submitted not only screenshot, but also an ORB-link. I think you know that if mipmap tweak is used, then 3dmark03 won't let you to publish score.


Edited by olegk@
Link to comment
Share on other sites

older versions of Wprime sometimes report invalid checksum even when there's nothing wrong. See why we don't want to go back to older Wprime versions ;)?


if the score is in line with what other are getting with same CPU; there is no reason to block. The benchmark was run with the hardware mentioned and autosubmitted more than a year ago with version 1.43; E6300 @ ~4000Mhz scores the time he has.


If you say so,no prob...;)


Link to comment
Share on other sites

This score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506119


I reporte recently as having no proof at all. It was checked by a mod who validated it as an old score.


My problem here is that this score was not in this category untill june of this year? meaning if its an old score it has been moved here from another category recently?


So if it was moved to this category recently then surely it should be updated with proof.


I wanted to check the users scores to see if it had been moved from a x800 pcie category but cant even find the user in the team the score has him linked to?


I just checked the evolution ranking on this, the score was ranked 27th untill june 08, this category gpu wasnt even created until very recently because I requested it.

So how can it 'being an old score be validated without proof?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, I'm writing to describe my results in Radeon 9550 category:








Firstly, sorry for that I don't use GPU-Z (I have only one screen with GPU-Z), but when any test was end and I want to open GPU-Z it suspend PC, so I used RivaTuner.


Next problem is that in screen you can see it is radeon 9600, but 9550 VGuru have jumper to swich overclocking option. So, we can see PC detect card like 9600... Why I wrote it? I want please moderators to check results and put theirs like "This result has been moderated by the hwbot crew...", becouse I won't have problems with it in future.


Sorry for may crappy english.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...