Oki Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 I have sent this message to first moderator on line, and sorry Turrican that was you, but maybe here i could find answer for my question. I was wondering if this could be a explained, and of course if you have time for this "checking". 3Dmark 01 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566945 [ about 100mhz freq more for memory on card, but 800mhz less than my E8500, and he gained over 5k points ? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=923607 - here you can take a look at this score made by me. Honestly i really do not know what he did, but i think something is really strange : ) Maybe some tweaks could do the magic, but for 5k points, I would really like to know what happened. Thank you for your time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 You're on Windows 7 which is suicide for 3DM01... you also dont have an FPS breakdown window open so its hard to see where hes gaining FPS over you.... seeing as you're on W7... I expect it to be in every subtest You're verification link takes me back to your screenshot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oki Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 (edited) Ok so i need to do 01 in xp and i will gain 5 000 points, doesn't matter if mine E8500 is clocked at 4.4 ghz and his Core 2 E6400@ 3623mhz. Ok i did not know that. But sure i can do mine test again, not a problem, just don't have hdd with xp here atm...what would be on xp than ? i will gain like 10k points ? ok I have repeated 01mark with details, and yes - he did beat me like in every subtest !? Edited November 24, 2009 by Oki new screenie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Your score will deffo be better. I forgot to say last night... with that little GPU power, the CPU wont make as big-a difference as you'd expect. The GPU controls most of the score Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted November 24, 2009 Crew Share Posted November 24, 2009 I have sent this message to first moderator on line, and sorry Turrican that was you, but maybe here i could find answer for my question. no problem. i just read it. sorry, when you wrote this pm is was a already in bed sleeping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven86 Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924242 I'm sorry but i placed my score in the wrong category getting unfair points for that . Could you move it from the no BE to the BE cpu class? Phenom 2 X3 720BE should it be Thx and sorry for the mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostisbest Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 hi people i submited a new score afew days ago now can someone check it please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolbits Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Hi guys, someone have moved my score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=875323 in a wrong category, my graphc card is a 7600LE (see the screen and photos ) please move back in the right place. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostisbest Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 bump on my last post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolbits Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 hey mod news about my submission? Hi guys, someone have moved my score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=875323in a wrong category, my graphc card is a 7600LE (see the screen and photos ) please move back in the right place. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScunnyUK Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 (edited) Hi, This score is way to high for the gpu clock speeds of 672/1659/480!!!> http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=907559 Look at result in second place with simula clocked cpu but gpu clocks of 926/2286/580 and his score is 2000 3d marks lower!!!> http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=888274 Possibly bugged run or MipMap cheat? Reported his 3Dmark05 score aswell . http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=1305&applicationId=2&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=false&limit=100 Thanks Scunny. Edited November 29, 2009 by ScunnyUK Linked to wrong result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 (edited) http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=811786 SM3 scores look high for the clocks- especially Deep Freeze. LN2 cooled 9800GTX scores cant touch it. The guy doesnt participate in rankings and the result has been checked but I dunno how the score is possible? -> Its the only top 5 score in the 9800GTX/GTX+/ GTS250 categories where SM3 score is > SM2 Edited December 2, 2009 by K404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Can someone check this please? No CPU-Z validation, only a SS. Says it was previously moderated and ok'ed. How, with no validation? tia http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=732841 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdog Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 wprime score seems lot too fast http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924589 validation link links to wPrime v200 submitted on 25/Nov/2009 03:10:15 but it was scanned by hwbot on 24-11-2009 05:14 Screenshot looks photoshopped.....CPU-Z corners are round at top and square at bottom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 wprime score seems lot too fast http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924589 validation link links to wPrime v200 submitted on 25/Nov/2009 03:10:15 but it was scanned by hwbot on 24-11-2009 05:14 Screenshot looks photoshopped.....CPU-Z corners are round at top and square at bottom I'll have a chat with the others about the possibilit of PS. The score looks weird, like one PII 925 and a Athlon II 250 have been "merged". The screenshot shows v1.55 and a different time, so I changed it - 19.5s sounds more reasonable for that CPU at that frequency:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdog Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 thanks knopflerbruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdog Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 the score is now inline with others because knopflerbruce has corrected it, thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 score submission date: 07-05-2008 (7 May 2008)CPu-Z rule which says you need CPU-Z validation: 20-05-2008 score was valid at time it was posted. Fair enough, thank you. Also, as long as I have your attention, how about moving this http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=747315 to the proper catagory. Notice the multiplier in the SS is 4.5, which is what a 133 bus speed PIII 600 Coppermine is, not a 6 multiplier that the 100 bus speed 600 is supposed to have. See attached links below. http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium-III/Intel-Pentium%20III%20600%20-%20RB80526PY600256%20(BX80526F600256).html http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium-III/Intel-Pentium%20III%20600%20-%20RB80526PZ600256%20(BX80526C600256%20-%20BX80526C600256E).html Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 I was just checking my old scores and found out this. It was reported several times with valid reasons but it was still checked as valid by moderator http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667015 22 Nov 2007 07:19 created Ferdinand manual online submission 15 Dec 2007 06:10 reported chavo fucks reported by user due to possible cheat (Look the window whit the 3dmark result and you read "The benchmark was not run using default settings". It's relevant to see, I don't know if this is allowed or not, but is really suspect. Thank you.) 22 Jan 2008 12:13 reported wanako reported by user due to possible cheat (The bench was not run using default settings?) 22 Jan 2008 05:23 checked (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator () Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) I have reported few suspicious scores uploaded by the same user . 3Dmark01 single 8400 GS 256mb TOP 10 delly 31794 marks 690/550/1380 @ e8600/5.5Ghz nature 206fps/draghotic low 468fps/lobby low 545fps vs Johny Bravo 30325 901/602/2238 @ e8600/5.4Ghz nature 151fps/draghotic low 383fps/lobby low 381fps SAV 29144 900/560/2214 @ i7 920/4.6Ghz nature 146fps/draghotic low 367fps/lobby low 374fps My question : how is that possible that he scored 1.5-4k marks more than others using much less gpu/mem/shaders speed ? 3dmark03 same category delly 10716 690/550/1380 wings of fury 342fps vs 01001 10690 830/570/2100 wings of fury 290fps 12 10580 777/611/1554 wings of fury 299fps SAV 10539 900/555/2214 wings of fury 278fps I already know NeoForce opinion but I disagree and I would like to ask other moderators . I think these results should be take under consideration I might be wrong too 2003 category http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints= 2001 category http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints= Edited December 9, 2009 by 71proste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jor3llBR/Elano Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Hi can someone look into this WR: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=929511 I got a 9.093s and the 1st place has 9.094s and I'm still showing ranked 2nd place . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jor3llBR/Elano Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Hi can someone look into this WR: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=929511 I got a 9.093s and the 1st place has 9.094s and I'm still showing ranked 2nd place . Never mind I just lowered my score Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnksss Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 ok, so what happend to all the ES scores in the Vantage section? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemehnert Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=925567 hi i got this score blocked. why? i meet all the requirements with the screen shot. THanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Someone from hwbot team .... must take a look at the whole 9800GT DDR2 category. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.