Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here


Recommended Posts

all cpu category "p9400"

look at this result : http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=921696

and all other walhalla's results in this category .

p9400 is mobile core 2 duo proc 2.4ghz (http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLB64)

but in walhalla's verification (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=831051) cpu-z says : mobile core 2 quad (extreme) .

it is not P9400 !

 

so all his results on this cpu must be posted in another category . i think its qx9300 , there is no other mobile core 2 quad with 12mb L2 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have reported few suspicious scores uploaded by the same user .

3Dmark01 single 8400 GS 256mb TOP 10

capturesx.th.jpg

 

delly 31794 marks 690/550/1380 @ e8600/5.5Ghz nature 206fps/draghotic low 468fps/lobby low 545fps

vs

Johny Bravo 30325 901/602/2238 @ e8600/5.4Ghz nature 151fps/draghotic low 383fps/lobby low 381fps

SAV 29144 900/560/2214 @ i7 920/4.6Ghz nature 146fps/draghotic low 367fps/lobby low 374fps

 

My question : how is that possible that he scored 1.5-4k marks more than others using much less gpu/mem/shaders speed ?

 

3dmark03 same category

delly 10716 690/550/1380 wings of fury 342fps

vs

01001 10690 830/570/2100 wings of fury 290fps

12 10580 777/611/1554 wings of fury 299fps

SAV 10539 900/555/2214 wings of fury 278fps

 

I already know NeoForce opinion :) but I disagree and I would like to ask other moderators .

I think these results should be take under consideration

I might be wrong too :)

 

2003 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

2001 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

so, who can comment these high/unreal scores ?

 

Jmke ? Massman ? Knopflerbruce ? guys please

Edited by 71proste
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another try :)

01: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565

03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567

05: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568

AM3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570

 

These scores were already reported/moderated, but moved into the wrong categoy back then. Please move the scores into this correct category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1550_256mb_rv_515_64_bit (My 06 score is already there)

Edited by Hyperhorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm ranked second on this but I can't see the first place for the life of me:

 

X3380:

SuperPi 32m Hall Of Fame: (view top 100)

935839

SuperPi 32m - 10min 5sec 210ms - Jor3llBR/Elano (XtremeSystems) - (Intel Xeon X3380 @5130MHz)

0.1 points start discussion

858101

SuperPi 32m - 11min 54sec 0ms - road-runner (PURE) - (Intel Xeon X3380 @4199MHz)

0.1 points

 

Is it a bug?

 

I cleaned cookies etc but all I see is 2 results but my profile says I'm second place:

 

[#2 Xeon X3380 in SuperPi 32m] #2 Xeon X3380 in SuperPi 32m with 10min 5sec 210ms - 0.1 points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hello!

 

My friend was requested me to post this comment :)

 

 

"Dear Moderator,

I would like to call Your atention that my result in the wPrime 32 Q9550 list is 8.140 while jor3elbr/elano's time is only 8.144.

When I wrote 8.140 I became the second although my time is better.

Please do the corrections in that way:

1., lipi67 8.140

2., jor3elbr/elano 8.144

Thank You very much in advance.

Yours faithfully

Lipi67"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi last night i submitted a score for vantage with a 5870 its my fastest score with a single gpu so far and it states i got 15 points + 1.5 now my points on profile has not changed at all it has been 24 hours but i still see no change to my points on my profile, but it states the points have been awarded when i look at the submitted result. i had 421 now still the same ????

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/951559_uncle_fester_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5870_21655_marks

________

Ignazio giunti

Edited by uncle fester
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/952874_1badmojoe_reference_clock_rampage_ii_gene_220.44_mhz

 

Reference Clock Rampage II Gene rank: 1BadMoJoe’s best Reference Clock submission, but rank not calculated yet

 

I posted this some time ago and the rank has not been calculated in top5 Hall of Fame motherboard class, Thank you 1BadMoJoe

 

 

I just posted a submital a bit better than the one above, the one above I deleated and replaced with this one and still the same problem, Thank you again

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/956017_1badmojoe_reference_clock_rampage_ii_gene_223.5_mhz

Edited by 1BadMoJoe
detailed problem report
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another try :)

01: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565

03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567

05: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568

AM3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570

 

These scores were already reported/moderated, but moved into the wrong categoy back then. Please move the scores into this correct category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1550_256mb_rv_515_64_bit (My 06 score is already there)

I know you can do it. :D

 

Edit: Thank you so much!

Edited by Hyperhorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...