Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here


Recommended Posts

Did I post this in the wrong thread???

If so, please let me know the right place??;)

 

Hello gyrock-san! I am not a result mod, but I looked at the result screenshot.... it is not clear.

 

My eyes are not so good, but I think Canyon Flight FPS are 228.850

 

If that is put into the formula, 50(228.850 + 168.319) = 19858.45

 

I think the SM3 score is 19859

 

The problem is the detail in the screenshot, a better resolution would be nice

 

 

 

If the scores are high for the MHz, I do not know :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1050800_xandelly_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23621_marks?tab=more

 

XP startup of 333MB/S, but no option to report.

 

Even if a user does not participate in the rankings, I think the scores should still follow the rules.

 

:)

 

 

 

 

 

Also:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2148368_cruzen_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23070_marks?tab=more

 

Validated score, but screenshot isn't for PCM05

Edited by K404
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1050800_xandelly_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23621_marks?tab=more

 

XP startup of 333MB/S, but no option to report.

 

Even if a user does not participate in the rankings, I think the scores should still follow the rules.

 

:)

 

 

 

 

 

Also:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2148368_cruzen_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23070_marks?tab=more

 

Validated score, but screenshot isn't for PCM05

 

pwned, I can report them :D

http://hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=1050800

 

http://hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=2148368

 

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933415_aciddman_wprime_32m_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_29sec_0ms?tab=info

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933415_aciddman_wprime_32m_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_29sec_0ms?tab=info

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

 

Fixed Scotty :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933284_aciddman_pcmark_2005_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_6179_marks

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

 

Same thing as the last one. tia :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933284_aciddman_pcmark_2005_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_6179_marks

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

 

Same thing as the last one. tia :)

 

Fixed, i think... page is too low, or something else :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same happens here Danutz, my pi 32 score is 0h 13m 01 343s, and i've tried all formulas to post the correct value, but no sucess, the result go crazy just like 15 days 34 h etc, or i get 13 seconds, i dont know if its a bug or me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that only in that list, general clasament, it`s make this error. Was "nice". Anticipating the result and checking the classament I was expecting first place. To bad cose the person ahead was in fact with 4 H not 5 as listed. C`est la vie...

I miss the old "Search database", was more flexible... here are to many restrictions or I am not looking in the right place. I will see. Have a nice day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...